Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
a serious question for Longhorn:
- Thread starter rnch
- Start date
redsamurai
Banned
Noun 1. rhetorical question - a statement that is formulated as a question but that is not supposed to be answered; "he liked to make his points with rhetorical questions"
Definition:
A question asked merely for effect with no answer expected. The answer may be obvious or immediately provided by the questioner. See also: What Is a Rhetorical Question?
Definition:
A question asked merely for effect with no answer expected. The answer may be obvious or immediately provided by the questioner. See also: What Is a Rhetorical Question?
redsamurai
Banned
I actually laud longhorn for not answering the obviously rhetorical question. To do so would only confim what we already know about him............."douchebag". 
txbondsman
New member
Bill errrr Hillary doesn't have a Chinaman's chance to win shit. The "blind loyalty" that you speak of comes from believing what the president is doing is correct, so no. I don't feel like the government raising my taxs by 1800.00/ year, taking my GD money and giving it to lowlifes who don't want to work because their Gubment checks is commin is something that I feel like doing.
They need to have a box on the IRS form, it says check box if you want to:
1) give X dollars to government give-a-ways for bums, freeloaders, illegals and welfare cheats. OR
2) give money for curbing illegal immigration, homeland security, anti terrorism and military expenses.
That way all yall bleeding heart libs could give them all your shit w/o taking away mine! And my money would keep yall safe while you did it! How's that.....
They need to have a box on the IRS form, it says check box if you want to:
1) give X dollars to government give-a-ways for bums, freeloaders, illegals and welfare cheats. OR
2) give money for curbing illegal immigration, homeland security, anti terrorism and military expenses.
That way all yall bleeding heart libs could give them all your shit w/o taking away mine! And my money would keep yall safe while you did it! How's that.....
redsamurai
Banned
rnch said:
the question I'm referring to as rhetorical is "would he support his commander in chief if it so happens to be Billary". The obvious answer is no, which makes him a giant ass of a hypocrite given that he expected us to do no less with a man who has plunged western civilization into what might possibly be an irreversible spiral. I honestly don't terribly wish Hillary to be president.....because she's as polarizing a character as jr is. Do we need another 4-8 years of partisan bullshit? To be fair to her, she's infinitely more capable than anyone on the republican side save for maybe Ron Paul. But there is no doubt she would be the polarizing centerpiece for the next conservative hypocrite movement. The U.S "desperately"....and I cannot emphasize "deserately" enough...........needs a new direction that pretty much say's fuck off to the traditional rep/dem wings. It won't happen because people in DC are enamored with their power and money, but so falls the empire..........so be it.
needtogetaas
New member
How much of that money spent on the war went into us pockets and back into the economy?rnch said:
redsamurai
Banned
rnch said:besides haliburton's pockets, u mean?
how much went back into YOUR pockets, needto?
ZERO went back into MY pocket.....
It's trickle down economics bor..........Halliburton makes billions and...................and......................and somehow it trickels down into our pockets. The how's and why's are irrelevant.......we should just all learn to shut the fuck up and turn on the TV, with a little drool coming out the side of our mouths...........that's a good boy, yes you are, yes you are!!!
Is anyone else tired as all hell of being treated like a little baby and being spoonfed bullshit on a daily basis?
txbondsman
New member
rnch said:
this war is never going to end, it isn't, and never was, a "conventional" war w/ one enemy that will be defeated, i.e. Germany, Japan. This is an on going war that will be managed to the best of our ability, well, to the best of the republicans ability and a few blue dogs. As long as there are muslim extremists who think of us as "infadels" and the Koran says to "kill all infidels", btw, that means YOU too (unless your Muslim, that I don't know) there will always be a war. It may be a big war or a smaller managed war, but they HATE you, because your not one of them, period, end of story.
The pukes who believe, "if we leave them alone, they won't hate us, and we'll all sing Cum Bah Ya, is sorely mistaken. They'll be on the next plane outa Bagdad after our last man leaves the area, commin to try and kill our asses. again......
Also, if I lived in a city that most of it was 12-15 feet below sealevel, and my government had just done away with the Patriot Act, I'd be looking at packing my shit and finding some higher ground...
redsamurai
Banned
...txbondsman said:
__________________
Yet they tolerated jews and christians in the middle east before 1948. There's still decent sized factions of christians living throughout the middle east. One of saddams top guys was a christian. That logic is what you've been told.....but you need to look deeper. The fact that we're not muslims is "NOT" why 20 guys hijacked a couple planes and flew everyone into buildings. It simply doesn't begin to unearth the problem. I'm not going to get into what I think is the problem, because too many people in the states REFUSE to admit ANY falliblilty in our dealings with the middle east in the last 5-6 decades. I have no love lost for muslims/arabs.......I beleive their religion drives them to the same zealotry that any other religion on the planet does. This why atheists/agnostics should run the world......but that's another discussion.
txbondsman
New member
Lestat said:
yeah, mee too, the lib nomination that is...
patsfan1379
New member
I hope Hillary wins too. It'll cement a victory for whomever the Repub. nominee is! 
I could beat her.
I could beat her.
txbondsman
New member
lol, Longhorn is the only guy that hasn't posted on here, sorry RNCH, didn't mean to hijack your question to LH.....
patsfan1379
New member
lol @ lh
fugged again by the ef gaybot
fugged again by the ef gaybot
txbondsman
New member
LMAO!!!!!!! I HATE that thing!! that's fuckin funny....
where is that leutenizing. hormone anyway!? lol
where is that leutenizing. hormone anyway!? lol
patsfan1379
New member
lh, aas, test e, winny, dbol, tren, deca, eq, tbol, anadrol
patsfan1379
New member
fuckin gaybot
yet ANOTHER example of how GOPers distort facts for their own use....SOME (not all!) of new orleans is 4 to 6 feet below sea level, NOT 12-15 feet. the residents of this city have been assured for dedades that their safety was maintained by flood control levies built by the United States Federal Corps of Engineers.....august 2005 proved how good their work was!txbondsman said:
other cities below sea level are: washington D.C, houston, galveston, and part of new york city.
i don't see THOSE residents "packing (their) shir and finding some higher ground"...
MY home is on the "sliver along the river" of high around and above sea level...flood insurance is not mandatory.
get your facts straight, tx!!!
but u r a republican....getting facts straight is not a priority for you guys...
rnch said:but u r a republican....getting facts straight is not a priority for you guys...
Is getting facts straight a priority for democrats?????? I hardly think so. People see things and believe what they want as it suits them. The "facts" are distorted to fit their views regardless of their political affiliations.
I think all the candidates are fucked up in their own ways. Is there any common sense candidates out there? Of course, one person's common sense is another's distorted views, right?
Personally, I don't know if Hillary would (if elected) raise taxes, but I highly suspect she would. I don't really like giving my hard earned money to a gov't who sees fit to spend (waste) it in ways I disdain. I think some programs should be available to help those in need...but I think a lot of those in need are lazy motherfuckers who just want to get handouts for the rest of their lives and live off others' hard-earned money. That pisses me off. It seems no matter what party is in office, all gov't does is just get bigger and bigger and wastes more and more money. And where do they get that money? The gov't doesn't produce anything or sell anything. The money comes from the public.
Oh, and txbondsman, that option would be great huh? The problem is no liberal would check the box to give any more money to the gov't than any conservative would. They would just think the money should come from the rich...unless of course those rich were liberals. Nobody likes paying taxes, yet everyone wants something. Proof of the fact that the simple way is usually the best way. Just like bodybuilding, people try to complicate it with all these new and scientific methods. We overanalyze the shit out of it instead of just doing it. It really is very simple, but if someone didn't tell you it was so complicated then they wouldn't have anything to sell you.
redguru
New member
ceo said:Is getting facts straight a priority for democrats?????? I hardly think so. People see things and believe what they want as it suits them. The "facts" are distorted to fit their views regardless of their political affiliations.
I think all the candidates are fucked up in their own ways. Is there any common sense candidates out there? Of course, one person's common sense is another's distorted views, right?
Personally, I don't know if Hillary would (if elected) raise taxes, but I highly suspect she would. I don't really like giving my hard earned money to a gov't who sees fit to spend (waste) it in ways I disdain. I think some programs should be available to help those in need...but I think a lot of those in need are lazy motherfuckers who just want to get handouts for the rest of their lives and live off others' hard-earned money. That pisses me off. It seems no matter what party is in office, all gov't does is just get bigger and bigger and wastes more and more money. And where do they get that money? The gov't doesn't produce anything or sell anything. The money comes from the public.
Oh, and txbondsman, that option would be great huh? The problem is no liberal would check the box to give any more money to the gov't than any conservative would. They would just think the money should come from the rich...unless of course those rich were liberals. Nobody likes paying taxes, yet everyone wants something. Proof of the fact that the simple way is usually the best way. Just like bodybuilding, people try to complicate it with all these new and scientific methods. We overanalyze the shit out of it instead of just doing it. It really is very simple, but if someone didn't tell you it was so complicated then they wouldn't have anything to sell you.
.gif)
txbondsman
New member
rnch said:yet ANOTHER example of how GOPers distort facts for their own use....SOME (not all!) of new orleans is 4 to 6 feet below sea level, NOT 12-15 feet. the residents of this city have been assured for dedades that their safety was maintained by flood control levies built by the United States Federal Corps of Engineers.....august 2005 proved how good their work was!
other cities below sea level are: washington D.C, houston, galveston, and part of new york city.
i don't see THOSE residents "packing (their) shir and finding some higher ground"...
MY home is on the "sliver along the river" of high around and above sea level...flood insurance is not mandatory.
get your facts straight, tx!!!
but u r a republican....getting facts straight is not a priority for you guys...
hey, I was listening to the mainstream liberal media! Houston isn't below sea level. hell it's 30 miles inland anyway, the ship channel is the only water way that connects it to the gulf. Galveston isn't at sea level either, the water doesn't even come close at the sea wall at high tide.
Wikipedia:
Downtown stands about 50 feet (15 m) above sea level,[28] and the highest point in far northwest Houston is about 125 feet (38 m) in elevation.
Galveston- Elevation 7 ft (2 m)
looks like you got your info from that damn liberal media too.
Powerbuilder333
Timeout? No, timeouts are for Plats
Why would anyone of an "alternative lifestyle" not support the war against Islamo-Fasism? Do you really think it couldn't happen here?
Rnch I know you know what happens to your peeps in the muslim world if "outed".
Bro, we never see things in the same light, but I'd hate to see you stoned (literally) to death.
Rnch I know you know what happens to your peeps in the muslim world if "outed".
Bro, we never see things in the same light, but I'd hate to see you stoned (literally) to death.
M
Megalomaniac
Guest
Powerbuilder333 said:
Liberals don't think about those things, they just bitch and moan without ever acting. I know what the hell I'll do if she gets elected, I'll get out. Those damn liberal bastards can come fight for her and her ways. Then they will start getting their ass kicked and beg for us to step back in.
If you are wondering if the trickle down theory works.
I made 220,000 during Bill's 8 years and 550,00 during the last 8 years of Bush and the trickle down so I would say it is working.
txbondsman
New member
Megalomaniac said:
1/2 a mil, and single, I'd be hiting some serious punani! LOL
good for you broseph....
I'd say that was trickling.....
Similar threads
