HGH Sub-Q Injections: Localized Fat Loss Exaggerated?

[toxicsambo]

Old school bors, please chime in. I've been doing Serostim HGH since April. I started off with 2 iu's daily and progressively bumped up to a current 6 iu's daily. I have my diet/cardio/lifting regiment in tact and I'm losing fat without a doubt, but I don't see much localized fat loss. It seems, as with fat in general, it's being stripped away throughout my body.

So the question is, why wouldn't I just inject I.M if I don't see much localized fat loss? Does I.M yield the same fat utilization as Sub-Q injections?

From what I'm noticing, I'm losing bf all around which makes perfect biological sense, or else I would have ripped abs and love handles on the side.

 

[axe3]

done a bunch of gh in my time and NEVER got any localised fat loss

 

[toxicsambo]

done a bunch of gh in my time and NEVER got any localised fat loss

What's your experience between I.M vs Sub-Q injections? Any difference in results?

 

[axe3]

What's your experience between I.M vs Sub-Q injections? Any difference in results?

I've always done it sub Q. And its funny even though I have never experienced localized fat loss I rotate my injection spots (I guess in hopes that the laws of physice sill somehow change)

 

[captainahole]

I found localized only really appeared when the body fat got really low. For someone my age it's hard to loose around the abs and it really helps to move it out of that area.

 

[ArmaniAK47]

I would worry about shooting IM because of the amount you'd waste in that big needle!

the needle has a certain volume to it.. a volume of GH getting wasted..

 

[toxicsambo]

I found localized only really appeared when the body fat got really low. For someone my age it's hard to loose around the abs and it really helps to move it out of that area.

How long and how much do you/did you use it for? I'm looking at it for long term. I figure by month 6 or 8 I should be pretty happy.

 

[captainahole]

How long and how much do you/did you use it for? I'm looking at it for long term. I figure by month 6 or 8 I should be pretty happy.

I was doing 5iu a day and for about a year.

 

[Zyglamail]

I never noticed any localized fat loss.

 

[toxicsambo]

I never noticed any localized fat loss.

Ever do I.M instead of Sub-Q? Any difference?

Thanks for the responses bors. Keep it going. Karma 4 all.

 

[Zyglamail]

Ever do I.M instead of Sub-Q? Any difference?

Thanks for the responses bors. Keep it going. Karma 4 all.

Nope, just sub-q for me. It was nice icing on the cake but if you dont have money to burn its better spent elsewhere.

 

[needtogetaas]

GH is a waist of money anyway but no there is no Localized Fat Loss from it.

 

[lartinos]

Total myth

 

[needsize]

I've been on gh for 3 years now from 2iu up to 8iu for extended periods....have noticed the fat loss but definitely not localized
one good reason for IM is it is suppposed to be active in the body longer that way

 

[toxicsambo]

GH is a waist of money anyway but no there is no Localized Fat Loss from it.

It's covered under my insurance. $20 co pay. My damn endocrine system is shot. But aside from the money aspect, you feel it's a waste?

 

[toxicsambo]

I've been on gh for 3 years now from 2iu up to 8iu for extended periods....have noticed the fat loss but definitely not localized
one good reason for IM is it is suppposed to be active in the body longer that way

3 yrs and your bf never went above what, 10%? It definitely is a fat blaster.

 

[goin on 4T]

Not localized fat loss, but when doing the 3 x week, 10IU's IM immediately post wo I noticed my calves grew insane and were veined out crazy! I started to do my quads to see if would help them but then I blew my acl, sugery was in Feb and cant do real leg wo for 3 more months...
Will start GH IM then

 

[Varga]

Sub-q for me too. I use 1IU ED and seen plenty of results I've done 2-3IU ED and I bloat badly.
Localized fat loss? I dont think that's the case. I've seen some accelerate fat loss in my lower abdomen but i dont know if it's the GH or me dieting. However even on bulkers it stays leaner than my other parts of the body. Who knows it might be genetics too.
Tried IM but do not see any noticeable difference and honestly it's a bit of a hassle.

 

[axe3]

It's covered under my insurance. $20 co pay. My damn endocrine system is shot. But aside from the money aspect, you feel it's a waste?

ABSOLUTELY NOT! As you get older you notice the little things that gh provides more and more. I personally love gh - And if you only have a 20$ co-pay you can not possibly go wrong

 

[Varga]

I agree. You dont feel it but as you get older things start to kinda change in your body and once you start taking GH you will see the difference. You dont need 2-3 IUs a day to see the difference, as low as 1 IU EOD will make a difference.

 

[sstp138]

how did insurance cover it?