Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

HGH Sub-Q Injections: Localized Fat Loss Exaggerated?

toxicsambo

New member
Old school bors, please chime in. I've been doing Serostim HGH since April. I started off with 2 iu's daily and progressively bumped up to a current 6 iu's daily. I have my diet/cardio/lifting regiment in tact and I'm losing fat without a doubt, but I don't see much localized fat loss. It seems, as with fat in general, it's being stripped away throughout my body.

So the question is, why wouldn't I just inject I.M if I don't see much localized fat loss? Does I.M yield the same fat utilization as Sub-Q injections?

From what I'm noticing, I'm losing bf all around which makes perfect biological sense, or else I would have ripped abs and love handles on the side.
 
What's your experience between I.M vs Sub-Q injections? Any difference in results?

I've always done it sub Q. And its funny even though I have never experienced localized fat loss I rotate my injection spots (I guess in hopes that the laws of physice sill somehow change)
 
I found localized only really appeared when the body fat got really low. For someone my age it's hard to loose around the abs and it really helps to move it out of that area.
 
I would worry about shooting IM because of the amount you'd waste in that big needle!

the needle has a certain volume to it.. a volume of GH getting wasted..
 
I found localized only really appeared when the body fat got really low. For someone my age it's hard to loose around the abs and it really helps to move it out of that area.

How long and how much do you/did you use it for? I'm looking at it for long term. I figure by month 6 or 8 I should be pretty happy.
 
I never noticed any localized fat loss.
 
Top Bottom