Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

This Made Me LOL

still working on the paragraph
oh I see
I'll tangle with the oriental babe while you formulate your reply
 
when it dawns on people like plunkey that the sever loss of nutrition from our food supply actually cost them hundreds of pound on their bench over their lifetime...it'll finally set in. It's a simple analogy..we're all operating on 85-87 octane, barely serviceable. The human organism was meant to use much more potent gas.


I don't understand you.

Let's look at being "Environmentally Conscious" from this perspective:

Human beings live on ONE planet. It is the only place capable of providing us with air, food and water that we need to survive. The most critical resources -- reasonably unpolluted air and potable water -- are finite. That is a fact. Additionally, the most practical energy source (petroleum) is also finite.

At this point in time, and for the foreseeable immediate future, there are no other places where we can live. Period. That is just a simple fact.

Maybe in numerous generations intergalactic travel to seek new places to live that will provide us with the resources we need will be viable, but for now, nada.

How can being environmentally conscious be stupid? It is simply common sense to not wantonly waste and contaminate your limited, critical resources. No, they won't run out in our lifetimes, but the fact is things are going to become progressively worse for succeeding generations unless people get realistic. I honestly cannot think of anything more selfishly inconsiderate than leaving a depleted mess for the future to deal with simply because this generation chooses to ignore an unpleasant reality :whatever:

You don't have to be a tree hugger to be pragmatic.
 
I don't understand you.

Let's look at being "Environmentally Conscious" from this perspective:

Human beings live on ONE planet. It is the only place capable of providing us with air, food and water that we need to survive. The most critical resources -- reasonably unpolluted air and potable water -- are finite. That is a fact. Additionally, the most practical energy source (petroleum) is also finite.

At this point in time, and for the foreseeable immediate future, there are no other places where we can live. Period. That is just a simple fact.

Maybe in numerous generations intergalactic travel to seek new places to live that will provide us with the resources we need will be viable, but for now, nada.

How can being environmentally conscious be stupid? It is simply common sense to not wantonly waste and contaminate your limited, critical resources. No, they won't run out in our lifetimes, but the fact is things are going to become progressively worse for succeeding generations unless people get realistic. I honestly cannot think of anything more selfishly inconsiderate than leaving a depleted mess for the future to deal with simply because this generation chooses to ignore an unpleasant reality :whatever:

You don't have to be a tree hugger to be pragmatic.

Outstanding straw man!

It's not a matter of people who want to save the planet and those who want to destroy it.

It's a matter of people who advocate irrational, impractical, economically unfeasible solutions based on junk science and those who don't.

Taking actions based solely on belief and faith isn't science -- it's religion. And the vast majority of today's enviro-whacko movement certainly qualifies as a religion.

And here's another thing I'd like someone to explain to me: We're already over-regulated, over-governed and over-taxed. Yet enviro-whacko's constantly run to the government and courts for more regulation. If environmental pollution really is such a big problem, what in the world would lead someone to believe that our government could do anything constructive in the first place? They can't deliver our mail, balance their checkbook, rein-in corruption and graft, control health care costs, etc. etc. What makes you think for a second they can heal Mother Earth?

Here's an interesting test: Above, you cited your concern for our limited natural resources, particularly food and water. I'm going to assume you are against genocide and/or Chinese-style population control, which means there will only be more people over time. So based on your statements above, you must hate the scam of organic farming, correct? Imagine if the entire world heeded those nutjobs and immediately switched to organic methods. Productivity per acre would plummet. It would require vast new amounts of deforestation and tremendous amounts of fresh water to make-up the difference in production. Yet instead, we rely on modern technology to increase yields per acre, produce plants that are more drought resistant, disease resistant, etc. etc. God bless the Monsanto corporation.

Isn't modern science wonderful in its ability to reduce the need for deforestation and fresh water? You are completely against a changeover to organic farming, aren't you?
 
when it dawns on people like plunkey that the sever loss of nutrition from our food supply actually cost them hundreds of pound on their bench over their lifetime...it'll finally set in. It's a simple analogy..we're all operating on 85-87 octane, barely serviceable. The human organism was meant to use much more potent gas.

Well God knows we all need several hundred pounds of bench in today's philistine environment. Not a day goes by where I think: "Gosh, I could be more professionally successful if only I could bench an additional 300 lbs!"

Here's a newsflash: Perhaps the reason you need the "high octane" (which is a scam) stuff is because you wrecked your body with poor choices of illegal AAS, irresponsible workouts and perpetual fogging. Plus, let's be honest here -- that little four-cylinder engine of yours you call a mind probably does need all the octane it can gather, but the vast majority of us can get up and over the rolling hills of life just fine.

:)
 
And here's another thing I'd like someone to explain to me: We're already over-regulated, over-governed and over-taxed. Yet enviro-whacko's constantly run to the government and courts for more regulation. If environmental pollution really is such a big problem, what in the world would lead someone to believe that our government could do anything constructive in the first place? They can't deliver our mail, balance their checkbook, rein-in corruption and graft, control health care costs, etc. etc. What makes you think for a second they can heal Mother Earth?

I remember what it was like before we were "over-regulated, over-governed and over-taxed", and I don't recall any businesses voluntarily doing anything to reduce the impact of their various waste products. We've seen how the "free market" deals with the environment. I don't think that going back to a time when the East River or the Cuyahoga were in danger of catching on fire is a good thing.
 
tumblr_liojvmxzLy1qbz2gro1_500.jpg

do you have any big-breasted children who have eclipsed the age of consent???...a (religious) friend of mine wants to know :verygood:
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom