Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Cars (1885-2050)

samoth

New member
EU to ban cars from cities by 2050

EU to ban cars from cities by 2050 - Telegraph

Cars will be banned from London and all other cities across Europe under a draconian EU masterplan to cut CO2 emissions by 60 per cent over the next 40 years.

The European Commission on Monday unveiled a "single European transport area" aimed at enforcing "a profound shift in transport patterns for passengers" by 2050.

The plan also envisages an end to cheap holiday flights from Britain to southern Europe with a target that over 50 per cent of all journeys above 186 miles should be by rail.

Top of the EU's list to cut climate change emissions is a target of "zero" for the number of petrol and diesel-driven cars and lorries in the EU's future cities.

Siim Kallas, the EU transport commission, insisted that Brussels directives and new taxation of fuel would be used to force people out of their cars and onto "alternative" means of transport.

"That means no more conventionally fuelled cars in our city centres," he said. "Action will follow, legislation, real action to change behaviour."

The Association of British Drivers rejected the proposal to ban cars as economically disastrous and as a "crazy" restriction on mobility.

"I suggest that he goes and finds himself a space in the local mental asylum," said Hugh Bladon, a spokesman for the BDA.

"If he wants to bring everywhere to a grinding halt and to plunge us into a new dark age, he is on the right track. We have to keep things moving. The man is off his rocker."

Mr Kallas has denied that the EU plan to cut car use by half over the next 20 years, before a total ban in 2050, will limit personal mobility or reduce Europe's economic competitiveness.

"Curbing mobility is not an option, neither is business as usual. We can break the transport system's dependence on oil without sacrificing its efficiency and compromising mobility. It can be win-win," he claimed.

Christopher Monckton, Ukip's transport spokesman said: "The EU must be living in an alternate reality, where they can spend trillions and ban people from their cars.

"This sort of greenwashing grandstanding adds nothing and merely highlights their grandiose ambitions."



:cow:
 
That has to be a joke.

I smell The Onion!


Good think nobody can validate the article I poasted by clicking the link or using google!

Meh, it's politics. That's not my area. All I know is that what we do now (WRT oil, &c.) isn't sustainable, and nobody's going to do anything about it until the cost of non-oil technology becomes financially favorable to oil technology. You know, 'cause we're all totally foward-thinking like that.



:cow:
 
Transportation will radically transform by then

Like it has in the last 50 years? It's changed, but I wouldn't say it 'transformed', and it certainly hasn't been a radical change.

Technology advances based on scientific/technological advancements and capital considerations. Nobody's going to get rich today inventing/marketing a gasless car, hence why nobody's really pushing it yet. When it becomes financially feasable, however, we'll really start to see some changes (on the paradigm-shift level). $3.75/gal gas isn't going to do it.

Europe's done much more for transportation than the US has, but we're much more spread out... once again, going back to what's going to make someone money.



:cow:
 
Cars won't change much over the next 40 years, because it's a heavily regulated industry.

For silicon chips, computers, Internet -- massive changes will occur.

For televisions, cars, air travel -- I don't think we'll see much.

Cell phones sit on the fence because they are part wild west and part regulated (at least their airwaves are).

Even advances in healthcare technology rely heavily (if not primarily) where you argue to the regulators that your shiny new device isn't different than anything sold prior to the 1976 Safe Medical Devices Act (that's how the FDA 510(k) process works). It's funny -- you argue like hell that your new device is novel in the patent. Once that's signed and sent-off to the government, you do a complete 180 and argue to FDA that it's no different than a previous product. And where do you send that form to? Yup, the government.
 
Top Bottom