again we go back to my original point of the people preaching these outdated pct's are people on HRT. and yes it works because they never come off so they are always getting a nice boost from injecting testosterone. its like fighting a battle with unlimited troops and bragging that you never lost.. those of us that cycle don't have the luxury of running bad pct's.. by the time you figure out you were wrong you have lost most of your gains .. and then those just jump on HRT or just stay on. i compare it to people married with kids who tell others how wonderful it is to have a family, but in reality they hate every minute of it lol. misery loves company... okay maybe that example is a bit excessive, but you get what i'm saying.
In case this was directed at me, I am not preaching any particular PCT, whether it be for or against using nolva. I don't care. Use whatever you guys want to use. But before all these other options were available and became popular, we used clomid and or nolva. I just stated my opinion and experiences. I've used nolva to get rid of gyno while off cycle. I've used nolva to prevent gyno while on cycle. I've used nolva in PCT long before I began HRT. Since beginning HRT I have no need to use anything for "PCT" since I never come off.
However, (before HRT) I used to recover just fine from hcg/nolva, an AI to keep estrogen at minimum helps a lot too.
Nolvadex is a very useful drug...for men and women.
43% is a pathetic majority.. the fact its ONLY 43% considering how many forums and people push a breast cancer drug for bodybuilders i would be very worried if i was a nolva pct believer. i know a lady that had breast cancer and the doc put her on nolva for 5 years after she got better. she hated the stuff and so did everyone else she knew who were cancer survivors. i think she said she was only running 5mg a day too.. so i have no idea why this drug is so popular, its gotta be because its cheap or maybe docs get a nice kickback from the drug company for pushing it? no idea.. in my experience things that are cheap are cheap for a reason
nolva does work though when used properly if you have gyno or to prevent breast cancer for coming back.. i'm not argueing that at all. but is it worth the sides? fuck no
No drug was ever developed for bodybuilding. Everything we use for bodybuilding is "off label". Why do people push drugs indicated for prepubertal cryptorchidism, secondary hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, and induction of ovulation and pregnancy in infertile women to bodybuilders (hcg/hmg)? Because they act differently in men and produce desired effects.
The most common side effects of tamoxifen in women are hot flashes, and loss of menstruation or other menstrual disruption/disorder. Nausea, leg cramps, muscle aches, hair thinning, and headache are others. And these are usually somewhat rare, or if they occur they are often not severe enough for patients to discontinue usage of the drug.
In men, side effects stated are: a loss of sexual ability/interest may occur.
Keep in mind that these studies are ran on patients who have had breast cancer and have been receiving tamoxifen for a period of 5 years. The longer you take any drug, the more likely you are to see side effects, no matter how rare they may be. And EVERY drug has a list of side effects. Just watch TV a bit and wait for the drug commercials, then listen to the list of possible side effects.
Myself and many others here have stated we have had no side effects from tamoxifen (unless you consider reduced LDL a side effect), yet you claim side effects are guaranteed. Side effects are guaranteed, sure...but not for everyone. As a matter of fact side effects are usually only seen in a very small percentage. The truly adverse and serious side effects are usually only seen in about 1-2% or less of patients for most drugs. If that were not the case and side effects were guaranteed for the majority as you say, the FDA would not have approved these drugs.
The simple answer for why the drug is cheap is because it is an old drug and the patent expired a long, long time ago and it became available to produce (and was/still is produced) as a generic version. It has nothing to do with the efficacy of the drug, as you are insinuating.
Hope This Helps.