Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

WTC brought down by bombs?

prostetic dong

New member
Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says

By Olivier Uyttebrouck
Journal Staff Writer
Televised images of the attacks on the World Trade Center suggest that explosives devices caused the collapse of both towers, a New Mexico Tech explosion expert said Tuesday.
The collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, said Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
"My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.
Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures.
Romero said he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts.
Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures.
"It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that," Romero said in a phone interview from Washington, D.C.
Romero said he and another Tech administrator were on a Washington-area subway when an airplane struck the Pentagon.
He said he and Denny Peterson, vice president for administration and finance, were en route to an office building near the Pentagon to discuss defense-funded research programs at Tech.
If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, the detonations could have been caused by a small amount of explosive, he said.
"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points," Romero said. The explosives likely would have been put in more than two points in each of the towers, he said.
The detonation of bombs within the towers is consistent with a common terrorist strategy, Romero said.
"One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack and secondary device," Romero said.
Attackers detonate an initial, diversionary explosion that attracts emergency personnel to the scene, then detonate a second explosion, he said.
Romero said that if his scenario is correct, the diversionary attack would have been the collision of the planes into the towers.
Tech President Dan Lopez said Tuesday that Tech had not been asked to take part in the investigation into the attacks. Tech often assists in forensic investigations into terrorist attacks, often by setting off similar explosions and studying the effects.
 
THEY WERE HIT BY AIRPLANES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! going 300 miles per hour...
 
As of yet I have heard no one say that they saw, felt, or heard of any explosions.
How many planes do you think was needed as a diversionay plan?
 
The WTC was brought down because, according to THE GUY WHO DESIGNED AND BUILT THE BUILDINGS, the steel supports melted due to the intense heat from the airplanes that exploded and were carrying A ZILLION TONS OF FUEL.

There were no bombs.

There were no men with big hammers pounding on the walls.

It must be fun to post speculation. I should try it some day.

-Warik
 
The bombs were two 767 airplanes flying at 400 plus mph and fully loaded with fuel.

The buildings collapsed because the heat from the intense fire weakened the structure around where it was hit. When this structure gave way, the weight of the structure above it overloaded the supports below it and it came down. Better known as a cascading failure.

There were no secondary bombs. I too watched and rewatched the video's and saw no evidence to support that theory. I don't even think the terrorists thouhgt that they would cause this much damage.
 
figure 8000 gallons of gas, go get the chem book out and figure out the energy in a gallon of iso-octane or whatever jet fuel is, burn 8000 gallons of it. metal decomposes.....
 
If the WTC could be brought down my using some explosives placed in and around the tower's why boughter using planes at all. Unless Holiywood planned it of course, they love special FX.

Normally when secondary explosions are used as a diversionary tactic it's to normally lure more victims into another area thinking their entering a safe zone, as bomber's have been doing here in Ireland for over 30 years now.

If the intended victims are going to be soldiers it's normally to route them into a killing zone for a final crushing assault. This is explaining it very simple here for civilians, but Chesty knows the tactics which I'm talking about.

The WTC were brought down by murdering bastards flying aeroplanes full of more innocent victims. And these type's of stupid posts here on elitefitness do nothing to help heal the wounds.

Bouncer
 
Top Bottom