Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Would you consider this pron?

LuluDeren

New member
A picture of two underage girls sucking each other's bananas posted in a forum designated as NSFW?

This is not a professional picture of two legal age models posing as teenies, but looks to be something the girlies themselves set up. I argued that given the context (the originating poster deliberately posting in the NSFW forum), because it simulated fellatio, and that the girls appeared about 13, that the pic was indeed pornographic.

Any opinions?
 
Last edited:
reno240 said:
Not so much pornographic as it is majorly inappropriate.

Yes, that's what i thought. I never said pron to the poster, but I did tell him I thought it was inappropriate, especially since he posted in NSFW.
 
LuluDeren said:
Yes, that's what i thought. I never said pron to the poster, but I did tell him I thought it was inappropriate, especially since he posted in NSFW.
Why would that poster even associate himself with things like that?
 
Wrong on several levels. The banana thing can be a sexy prop but when little girls are involved it's more than a little distasteful.
 
Kids of Today seem to grow up sooo fast, Many Kids start having Full sex as from the ages of 12, DOES NOT Make it right, I do believe there is a time and place for everything and this girls knew what they were doing, still it is inappropriate
 
I would say that the picture is indeed a problem and puts everyone who sees it at risk, because now the thing is in your browser cache and could be used against you as evidence.
 
I agree with the above. Frankly, whoever put it up on NSFW section delibrately did it KNOWING it was inappropriate. He's playing dumb and is a criminal himself. Fucking pathetic. This shit pisses me off. There are enough fucking hos in the world to not have to fuck with little children!
 
I would hazard to guess that 'yes' the girls knew what they were doing, but I would assume they had probably intended for the pic to be viewed by a contempoarary...boys they had crushes on. Not saying that is appropriate either, but at any rate, I argued that (as Gonelifting referred to) the poster wouldn't have posted in the NSFW if that wasn't his intention..
 
gonelifting said:
I agree with the above. Frankly, whoever put it up on NSFW section delibrately did it KNOWING it was inappropriate. He's playing dumb and is a criminal himself. Fucking pathetic. This shit pisses me off. There are enough fucking hos in the world to not have to fuck with little children!

I have to agree 100%.
 
I'll be honest. When I was 12 I wanted to have sex. It doesn't make it right but for me to condemn a 12 year old for wanting to have sex would be hypocritical of me.
 
The poster is playing 'dumb', but he's an ass.
 
The Old Vet said:
I'll be honest. When I was 12 I wanted to have sex. It doesn't make it right but for me to condemn a 12 year old for wanting to have sex would be hypocritical of me.

True, but to repost video of two 13 year olds simulating sex shows the poster's puerile thoughts not the kids. i don't need to see it, nor does anyone else. I'd be pissed, if i were to see it.
 
redguru said:
True, but to repost video of two 13 year olds simulating sex shows the poster's puerile thoughts not the kids. i don't need to see it, nor does anyone else. I'd be pissed, if i were to see it.

I agree.
 
would you be worried about child porn charges if the image was on your computer??

if no.. go ahead.. for me.. i don't want to see it..
 
Just to clarify, it was a still picture(not video) in a thread in a forum marked WTF and NSFW. Usually the imagery is funny adult humour and edgy comics, etc. No one really knows 'what' is on a thread until you open it.

In any other forum, it could be said it was simply two girls with their mouths on the other's banana. That is not the implication when placed in the NSFW forum. All I said, verbatum, was: "Er, I think you've jumped the shark with this one, (users nic). These are girls. And the implication is graphic or you wouldn't have placed it in the WTF/NSFW forum." And now this guy is trying to paint me as some irrational feminazi.
 
LuluDeren said:
Just to clarify, it was a still picture(not video) in a thread in a forum marked WTF and NSFW. Usually the imagery is funny adult humour and edgy comics, etc. No one really knows 'what' is on a thread until you open it.

In any other forum, it could be said it was simply two girls with their mouths on the other's banana. That is not the implication when placed in the NSFW forum. All I said, verbatum, was: "Er, I think you've jumped the shark with this one, (users nic). These are girls. And the implication is graphic or you wouldn't have placed it in the WTF/NSFW forum." And now this guy is trying to paint me as some irrational feminazi.

lol
 
slat1 said:
Someone please post the picture...
AND the video that was mentioned.

I'm feeling horny!

lol, never any video and the originating poster took the pic down and replaced it, and I just checked and the thread is locked.

Anywho, I was just wondering if I overreacted about the image.
 
It must be bad if Pedo Bear approves.

pedpb.jpg
 
LuluDeren said:
lol, never any video and the originating poster took the pic down and replaced it, and I just checked and the thread is locked.

Anywho, I was just wondering if I overreacted about the image.

I'd say you did not overreact.
 
Either of these it?

bann.jpg


banna.jpg
 
Dammit tell us which Bannana pic!!!!!!!!!

banan.jpg


bannaaa.jpg


banaa.jpg
 
the age makes it inappropriate, but the age has nothing to do with the sexual nature of the picture. although it is possible for a picture of a girl with a banana in her mouth to be non-sexual, it's unlikely. so, the subjects could be 13 or 30, and it wouldn't make it more or less sexual. if you weren't saying otherwise, disregard.
 
jackangel said:
the age makes it inappropriate, but the age has nothing to do with the sexual nature of the picture. although it is possible for a picture of a girl with a banana in her mouth to be non-sexual, it's unlikely. so, the subjects could be 13 or 30, and it wouldn't make it more or less sexual. if you weren't saying otherwise, disregard.

I objected because the girls appeared underage to me.

BTW, I was just banned from that site and one of the mods put this under my user nic..."she asked to be banned, now she is". I never requested that, it was a blatant lie.

I guess some guys fiercely protect their banana pron.
 
LuluDeren said:
I objected because the girls appeared underage to me.

BTW, I was just banned from that site and one of the mods put this under my user nic..."she asked to be banned, now she is". I never requested that, it was a blatant lie.

I guess some guys fiercely protect their banana pron.

lu.jpg
 
LuluDeren said:
hahhhahhahhha! Damn, if only I could figure out how to get that in there as my avatar.

You are not supposed to Laugh when I make fun of you.

You are supposed to tell a mod on me. lolollo
 
all the whey said:
You are not supposed to Laugh when I make fun of you.

You are supposed to tell a mod on me. lolollo

Hmm, come to think of it, there was some clause regarding that in the 'rights and conditions' page of registration. Let me print that baby out and I'll return with a notarized bitch. :chomp:
 
as long as they arnt naked its not that big of a deal. underage girls are doing much "worse".

there are more important issues to deal with in society, like the use of the n-word
 
Top Bottom