mrplunkey
New member
it's not for any of us to "allow" her...don't you understand that? It's utterly reprehensible the scenario you're describing. But in the end it's between her, the baby and god. Now should what she's done be recorded and possibly used against her to deny some sort of future benefits package she may be seeking? That's certainly a discussion to be had. While people should be absolutely entitled to do with their own bodies as they wish, certain benefits that society as a collective enjoys could be withheld from her if she makes a habit out of doing what you suggest. But the intrinsic right for a person to do with their own bodies as they wish can never be perturbed under any circumstances. When you do that you, as a society, profess to lay ownership of that individual. Remember the whole ""Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" thing? It cuts both ways. You may not like it but sometimes that's tough.
For the record I find a woman who would do that in the scenario you described as very disturbed and troubled. Maybe she should be incentivized not to become pregnant in the future, maybe she's just not a person fit to have children.
So you support killing a perfectly viable, 100% healthy baby that is full-term?
What if the abortion process required the baby be delivered (or mostly delivered) first? Can they just kill it on the table?