Wisconsin will ruin the push for states rights with this shit.

[cindylou]

everything is pointless on the internets

that's the truth

The internet is shit

 

[miplank]

I've gotten a woman pregnant before, what the fuck does that matter though? It changes nothing...absolutely nothing. You don't get it, you're meaningless unless you mean something personally to the woman. Than it's between you and her and she will take it into account. Other than that, you're a fucking sperm donor no more no less. Get over it.

*Then



I refuse to talk to discuss this any further with someone that doesn't know the difference between then/than.

 

[zwhit]

the only thing I got from this thread is that no one wants to have redsam's baby

 

[bigbassturd]

Breaking news

 

[miplank]

the only thing I got from this thread is that no one wants to have redsam's baby

and that he jerks off A LOT

 

[nangiggles]

they can get pregnant by what you've blasted all over the floor and your screen your whole life. It doesn't take you 9 months to save up a load. We can quite literally fap one out in 5 minutes, doesn't change our lives whatsoever. I've seen women completely change physically and mentally from just one pregnancy. It's kind of a big life altering deal for them even in the best of circumstances.

I'm super appalled at Plunkey's lack of understanding on this point given that his current wife had some not un-serious complications not too long ago when she gave birth. How many men have fucking died from fapping complications? FFS.

Women don't carefully craft an egg for months like a damn pearl, we don't even have to do anything. Men have to at least fap and ejaculate, women just have to live and breath pretty much...

When men knock a woman up, regardless of keeping it or not there are also psych changes, what miplank meant is that knocking up a chick and having a baby is very different

Sent from my HTCEVOV4G using EliteFitness

 

[wootoom]

can i wisconsin?

 

[redsamurai]

Nope. Assume in this case there are zero health issues involved in both mother and child.

Mom and baby are perfectly healthy, but mom decides on week 39 day 6 that she wants an abortion.

Do you let her have one?

it's not for any of us to "allow" her...don't you understand that? It's utterly reprehensible the scenario you're describing. But in the end it's between her, the baby and god. Now should what she's done be recorded and possibly used against her to deny some sort of future benefits package she may be seeking? That's certainly a discussion to be had. While people should be absolutely entitled to do with their own bodies as they wish, certain benefits that society as a collective enjoys could be withheld from her if she makes a habit out of doing what you suggest. But the intrinsic right for a person to do with their own bodies as they wish can never be perturbed under any circumstances. When you do that you, as a society, profess to lay ownership of that individual. Remember the whole ""Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" thing? It cuts both ways. You may not like it but sometimes that's tough.

For the record I find a woman who would do that in the scenario you described as very disturbed and troubled. Maybe she should be incentivized not to become pregnant in the future, maybe she's just not a person fit to have children.

 

[redsamurai]

and that he jerks off A LOT

actually dude I don't jerk off at all, even when I'm not dating anyone. There's actually a very good reason for it but explaining it to you would be as productive as trying to explain string theory to the neighbors cats.

 

[redsamurai]

Women don't carefully craft an egg for months like a damn pearl, we don't even have to do anything.

for 9 months you don't have to do anything huh? it's barely noticeable is it? They may not post up here and admit but I bet anything there's a couple women here that if they read that post will research those get of jail alford pleas and come choke you in the night.