Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below hollywood17
New member
Will a only wintrol cycle work for losing weight with obviously working out and diet for someone who is 280 pounds?
Wintrol for weight Loss
- Thread starter hollywood17
- Start date
bluetwistedsteel67
New member
forget the winnie or any other gear for now. Diet is the only way to get your weight in check. Unless however, you're 7'6" in which case your weight is about right. But joking aside, taking AAS to lose weight is a bad idea. Bust your ass in the gym, do cardio 6-7 days per week and eat a clean diet that is slightly below your maintentance amount. Lose the weight slowl and steady. Gear is best used by people that are under 15% bodyfat at the most.
chiro2b
New member
winny will only hurt your liver at this point...diet and cardio are essential. Get a heart rate monitor so you know you're in a fat burning zone while doing cardio. Ask a million questions here (as long as you haven't found the answer already posted). Everyone here is very helpful and you can do a lot of research in the coming months while you get closer to your Ideal Body Weight (where the cost/benefit of taking aas would be maximized)
1. start at 106 pounds
2. add 6 pounds for every inch you are over 5' (I'm 5'7" so mine is 148)
3. you can calculate in +/- 10%
4. this puts you in a range to where the effects of either winny or something else would be "seen" the most...
5. this is also how you calculate the amount of calories you use in a day just maintaining your current weight-by taking that number and multiplying it by 10...
6. so keep your total caloric intake below that # and with cardio you should be set!
For women you start at 5' and 100lbs (which works for me!
) and add 5 lbs for every inch...
1. start at 106 pounds
2. add 6 pounds for every inch you are over 5' (I'm 5'7" so mine is 148)
3. you can calculate in +/- 10%
4. this puts you in a range to where the effects of either winny or something else would be "seen" the most...
5. this is also how you calculate the amount of calories you use in a day just maintaining your current weight-by taking that number and multiplying it by 10...
6. so keep your total caloric intake below that # and with cardio you should be set!
For women you start at 5' and 100lbs (which works for me!
) and add 5 lbs for every inch...
Last edited:
hollywood17
New member
So what you are saying is nothing will help at this point until im 196 Pounds?? Im 6'3 about 280 - Ive been told by doctors because of my build that an Ideal weight is around 230 - 240 . I wanting to lose the barrel and get hard. Thats my concern. Any Ideas?
chiro2b said:winny will only hurt your liver at this point...diet and cardio are essential. Get a heart rate monitor so you know you're in a fat burning zone while doing cardio. Ask a million questions here (as long as you haven't found the answer already posted). Everyone here is very helpful and you can do a lot of research in the coming months while you get closer to your Ideal Body Weight (where the cost/benefit of taking aas would be maximized)
1. start at 106 pounds
2. add 6 pounds for every inch you are over 5' (I'm 5'7" so mine is 148)
3. you can calculate in +/- 10%
4. this puts you in a range to where the effects of either winny or something else would be "seen" the most...
5. this is also how you calculate the amount of calories you use in a day just maintaining your current weight-by taking that number and multiplying it by 10...
6. so keep your total caloric intake below that # and with cardio you should be set!
For women you start at 5' and 100lbs (which works for me!
bluetwistedsteel67
New member
That is rediculous. Their is no formula that works based on height and weight. Do you really think somebody that is 5'9" is ideally 160lbs? What if they are 200 and 8%bf? These formulas are a joke and bf% is the true indicator of "ideal".chiro2b said:winny will only hurt your liver at this point...diet and cardio are essential. Get a heart rate monitor so you know you're in a fat burning zone while doing cardio. Ask a million questions here (as long as you haven't found the answer already posted). Everyone here is very helpful and you can do a lot of research in the coming months while you get closer to your Ideal Body Weight (where the cost/benefit of taking aas would be maximized)
1. start at 106 pounds
2. add 6 pounds for every inch you are over 5' (I'm 5'7" so mine is 148)
3. you can calculate in +/- 10%
4. this puts you in a range to where the effects of either winny or something else would be "seen" the most...
5. this is also how you calculate the amount of calories you use in a day just maintaining your current weight-by taking that number and multiplying it by 10...
6. so keep your total caloric intake below that # and with cardio you should be set!
For women you start at 5' and 100lbs (which works for me!
slat1
New member
I think the formula is a good start to be healthy... especailly for older people. Obviously, when you work out numbers change. We have all heard how the police use a body mass index. The if you are overly built with muscle you are considered obese (wonder how Coleman kept his job).
Any way. A budy of mine at 5'11" and 213lbs started taking some winstrol. He is now 235lbs! Everyone reacts differently!
Good luck bro!
Any way. A budy of mine at 5'11" and 213lbs started taking some winstrol. He is now 235lbs! Everyone reacts differently!
Good luck bro!
hollywood17
New member
Was it fat he put on or muscle weight?? Everything I have ever read leads me to belive this promotes muscle growth and fat loss..
slat1 said:
chiro2b
New member
bluetwistedsteel67 said:
You ever have conversations outside of body building? If not, open your eyes and realize that those guidelines i gave are not for those of us straining our bodies by OVERLOADING OURSELVES WITH ANIMAL and HUMAN HORMONES (myself included)...He is not at that step, so don't compare the numbers that YOU see as ideal (200 and 8%) to the real numbers for a man to function at optimum health (for endocrine function, cardiovascular health, etc.) Your perspective may be warped-those calculations are not, as you so eloquently said, "rediculous".
Similar threads
