As with any egomaniac, the rules don't apply to fonz. They only apply when they're in his favor. The fact that fonz himself made this rule also makes him a consumate hypocrite.
Yeah, JJ -- I too was wondering what he meant when he said my thinking was "cruel". But if you think about it, his misuse of the word draconian is so elegantly apropos. It's BIG. It's arcane. And most people wouldn't know what it means. Therefore, he throws it out there in an attempt to sound educated and intimidating. But much like his "research" it turns out to be incorrect and misleading -- and he doesn't even know it himself! How perfect is THAT?
Still using that same one study from 1991, eh fonz? Okay, let's play with your ball.
If you read that study you'll realize that the test was done on people with severe liver damage from alcohol abuse. The conclusions were done after the subjects obstained from drinking. Of course there was an improvement in liver values!
And I love this..."The ones who received NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTATION AND/OR oxandrolone showed more improvement." Well, that's a tad ambiguous, isn't it? AND/OR...? Which was it? BTW: "Ambiguous means vague, imprecise or contradictory.
The conlusion from that study is so flawed it's funny -- which is why there hasn't been another to back it up in 13 years. It's like saying; " Someone with a cold smoked 2 cigarettes a day for 2 weeks and cold symptoms subsided. It is therefore concluded that smoking cigarettes cures a cold."
But alas, this is the way it is with pretend scientists. The only people who think this guy has anything on the ball are those who don't know any better and are impressed with his babble and cut and pasting skills.
Ox is 17 AA. The very process causes liver damage. That's a fact fonz. Accept it. I believe even Juice Authority had a study that showed that. I'm sure there are many.
Now that he's been proven wrong, watch him close the thread.
Fonz is a joke. Wise up people.