Drifter said:And Wodin, that may be the standard sociological definition of religion but not that of atheism or agnosticism. Therefore your point is moot.
Your argument is superflous, this definition was developed to encompass the "Faiths" of Agnosticism and Atheism. For it requires just as much to not believe as it does to belive. Look at the fervent behavoir on both sides of the coin and you see similar behavoirs!