juve
New member
well, not to contribute to a heated argument, the used-to-be-marketed prohormones at least on paper were many more times more potent than most, if not all conventional AAS used today.
m1t and mohn - are in fact steroids and methyldienolone, mestanolone and methasteron, just to name a few, are xx times more anabolic/androgenic than testosterone, methandrostenolone (dianobol) and methyl-test. In practice, however, only m1t seemed to shine at the recommeneded dosage, but even others worked quite well at incremented doses (such is the trade-off
). Not all that looks good on paper transcends same benefits into reality, sadly.
m1t and mohn - are in fact steroids and methyldienolone, mestanolone and methasteron, just to name a few, are xx times more anabolic/androgenic than testosterone, methandrostenolone (dianobol) and methyl-test. In practice, however, only m1t seemed to shine at the recommeneded dosage, but even others worked quite well at incremented doses (such is the trade-off
