distanced said:The British panty washers didn't come close to making it on my poll
4everhung said:i think it still comes down to the individual...can't really tell how anyone will react until they are in deep shit for the first time..btw,what force were those two snipers from the action in Somalia who received the Congressional medals of honor posthumously?
longarms said:Unless you've been there & done that, it's all speculation based on hollywood & documentaries. I know a lot of rangers & spec ops guys, & they are all basically bad dudes. The bulk of the rangers are 18-22 year old kids. Delta guys are a whole 'nuther line of work. I don't know enough about the other services to make a call, & I've been around 23+ years.
We're working with the UK guys here now, all nice guys & gals.
My hat's off to all of them.
(respectfully)
Sergeant Major
Expert Infantry
Military Police
Drill Sergeant
(and I can't hold a candle to any of these spec ops guys)
The Republican said:Virginia Boys. Higher than Delta Force. Many in the military dont even know about them
nordstrom said:
Who are they. I watched part of a documentary about an air force special ops team once. Their normal training was supposedly almost as bad as SEAL hell week. But i can't remember the name.
...thanks for the info,I was going to just type "medal of honor",but then thought I was shortchanging the award by abridging it,so I put it as i did..shows what I know eh?..btw,I've seen blackhawk down about 3 times on DVD,but I always get loaded while watching my war movies(that way I can watch em multiple times and its always fresh)and i can't recall if these 2 delta guy's actions were depicted accurately..any info from those in the know?...I do know that much of "we were soldiers" was hollywood..but hell what those two did didn't reguire any hollywood glosslongarms said:Thanks, it doesn't take long for it to be more than you like!
BTW, the Medal of Honor is no longer referred to as the "congressional" medal of honor. Most folks don't know that, it's just what they've always heard.
There are some guys in my Bn that were in somalia when that went down, deep caca there, buddy.
The Republican said:
Well, I can say there arent a whole lot of them, and like I said most people even in the military dont know them. They were in Iraq working up north with the Kurds a year before we recently went in, and a few of them were actually killed by our own SF guys, obviously they were deeply undercover.
They are James Bond type men, Im talking about wristwatches that explode exactly 30 minutes after the soldier wearing it dies (on the wrist, so it can feel a pulse). Kinda discourages you from stealing a dead soldiers watch.
I have never tried searching for info on them online but maybe you can find some. If not let me know.
nordstrom said:
i cant find any info on the virginia boys
Were they the ones who tapped the phone lines and lived in Iraq for a year or so or was that Delta force?
Godzila said:I am active duty Marine right now, so I am going to go with Force recon. But I believe they all have there place, like SeALs, are primarily hostage rescue and anti-terrosim, while regular battlion Recon Marines are strictly intel-gathering...I don't know much about Delta or the Rangers. I know the Marine Corps is starting up a new Spec-ops unit, that is supposed to combine the best of all branches....it is currently up and running from what I understand and has approx 80 members.
..as far as the "exploding wrist-watch" story can you validate that? All spec-ops have a motto of never leaving anyone behind, so if a comrade is shot and dies while someone is trying to rescue his body, then they would kill 2 men. and it is not realistic to say "they are trained to take the watch off the person and discard before he dies" in a situation like that the last thing a man would think is "wait, i have bullets whizzing past my balls, but let me get homeboys watch off first" This would be assumed in the design phase of this "watch' if it ever did exist in the first place. Sorry, this just sounded like some Hollywood shit to me..
The Republican said:
I apologize that I have no documented proof of this, but I did work Army counterintelligence for more than 10 years. This is simply what one of the Virginia Boys told me.
Keep in mind there are not that many of them, and their purpose is not to be involved in "battles" as we know them. From what I understand they work in very small teams.
And if the wristwatch seems too "Hollywood," then you certainly wont believe some of the other stuff some of these guys have done/used.
![]()
Godzila said:
well that makes more sense then. If they are NSA/CIA/Spook types then they don't give a shit about bringing back dead bodies and would more than likely prefer to destroy them, for lack of identity....do you remember any other things they mentioned....I have never heard of "Virginia boys" do you know what agency or branch of service they worked for...stuff like that intrigues me. i wish i would have gotten into that type of thing when I started out. I know I would have at least made it to Recon, but that is actually fairly easy.
Crazy Ivan said:Who are they under ?No Such Agency or Christians In Actions ?
Godzila said:
I HATE that line, my buddy was Force Recon and always gave me that shit, he knew it pissed me off, but I am glad he never gave in though....oh well, i guess we will never know...
The Republican said:
Of course, I cant really talk to you about certain subjects we talked about, e.g. what they have been involved in in the past.
MR.? said:Air Force
Para-rescue!
They have the most demanding physical standards and recieve the most extensive training. They have the highest attrition rate during their indoctrination phase. They attend all special ops schools in addition to their own advanced courses.
When special ops needs rescue they send these guys in.
Crazy Ivan said:
Well, no shit ?! Really ?
Crazy Ivan said:Just messing with you man, they deserve a lot of credit, along with CCT's.
MR.? said:Air Force
Para-rescue!
They have the most demanding physical standards and recieve the most extensive training. They have the highest attrition rate during their indoctrination phase. They attend all special ops schools in addition to their own advanced courses.
When special ops needs rescue they send these guys in.
MR.? said:Air Force
Para-rescue!
They have the most demanding physical standards and recieve the most extensive training. They have the highest attrition rate during their indoctrination phase. They attend all special ops schools in addition to their own advanced courses.
When special ops needs rescue they send these guys in.
Kalashnikov said:
Air Force PJ's surely have an intense training regimen, especially water training, drown-proofing, etc, however, from what I have read (in the book Blackhawk Down) the rest of the special ops community saw the PJ route as the "shortcut" the spec. ops. "field". Again, this is just something I read, not speaking from personal experience. And I have heard of their amazing ability to rescue people in the most dangerous situations.
MattTheSkywalker said:
You want to talk resuces? Coast guard swimmers pull people out of freezing waters during hurricanes...those dudes are bad as fuck.
I trained with some PJ's. cool guys. the combat controllers were cool too.
Testosterone boy said:Dammit to hell, I wish I would not have run out of money. Never got to do so many things I wanted to:
Cave diving
Snowmobile the Colorado continental divide.......guaranteed pure suicide
Wreck dive at 400 feet
Shoot a charging rhino while rolling on the ground
Nightime ice dive
Climb Everest solo
OK..........daydream over. My vote is solo recon. Just have more respect for the solo folks.
Coast Guard swimmers have no fear and do amazing stuff but.........hurricanes don't normally coincide with freezing waters. Ocean storms............one has to respect the ocean. It can swallow a 1000' ship without a hiccup.
The Nature Boy said:whatever the A-Team was. they could kill all those other fuckers.
Arnee is the man. Imagine a military with a million Arnee's. Hoorah!JarHed said:
manny78 said:I'd say the British SAS, closely followed by the FFL. As for US units, those named in this thread all seem good to me.
JTF-2 ? Yes and no. They have little war experience and mostly look like a bunch of crying babies.
whatever the A-Team was. they could kill all those other fuckers.
The Nature Boy said:
lol.
let me give you a brief history of the A-Team.
"In 1972, a crack commando unit was sent to prison by a military court for a crime they didn't commit. They promptly escaped from a maximum security stockade to the Los Angeles underground. Today, still wanted by the government, they survive as soldiers of fortune. If you have a problem, if no-one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire the A-Team."
and if they wanted to kill guys they could have. They killed so many VC in Nam that they figured it would be more challenging to shoot at the feet of the bad guys and barely miss and blow out tires with their silver AK-47's.
JavaGuru said:
I don't think I've ever seen the A-team kill or seriously injure anyone in any episode, must have been court martialled for being conscientious objectors. However, they probably kept firestone in business shooting out all those damn tires with pin point accuracy.![]()
and if they wanted to kill guys they could have. They killed so many VC in Nam that they figured it would be more challenging to shoot at the feet of the bad guys and barely miss and blow out tires with their silver AK-47's.
JavaGuru said:BTW, I'll step outside the listed choices and vote for "any infantryman who saw sustained combat in WWII." Especially those poor bastards fighting on the Eastern Front, both German and Soviet. I can't imagine the mental/physical stamina required to endure near constant combat under those conditions for years at time.
JavaGuru said:However, those 10% that did must have been some tough bastards, the ultimate weed-out program.
tough. or lucky.
Maybe some of them hid instead of fighting. Or hung around a general, they stay at a safe distance.The Nature Boy said:
tough. or lucky.
The Republican said:Virginia Boys. Higher than Delta Force. Many in the military dont even know about them
bds20002002 said:The Girl Scouts.

I have admiration for both combatants on the eastern front.The eastern front was by far the most grueling theater of WWII with both armies displaying tremendous feats of tenacity and valor. You are quite incorrect though about German armor being both heavier and technologically superior to the Russian armor of '41-'42. The Soviets had both the KV-I and KV-II tanks which were behemoths compared to the German MK-IV tank(which at the time was the german 'heavy' tank though it was equiped which a shortbarreled 75MM gun suited for anti-personnel combat and thus its load out was primarily HE rounds with some HEAT rounds for anti-armor combat),in addition the Soviet T-34 was vastly superior to anything the germans fielded for the first 2+ years of combat..it wasn't until '43 when the tide had already turned against germany that they had the Tiger tank and then the Panthers,but by '44 the Soviets had thier own new class of heavy tanks. The germans won in the first 2 years because of superior tactics and elan. You are also mistaken when you label the entire german army as nazis. As a side note my g/f is Russian(from georgia) and I'm quite far form being a Nazi admirer.revexrevex said:4Everhung, that article portrays them as heroes, as survivors right? Now fucking compare them to the man and women of the Russian army, who were caught unexpected by heavy armor and superior technologies of the Nazi's, cities that were burned down,millions of people were executed, children, women, old man. ANd yet the Russians picked up whatever weapons they had, and fought valiantly to defeat the greatest evil of all time. That article portrays them as heroes. Heroes of NOTHING!
Very very hard to tangle to this man when it comes to WW2. As a side note , some of the Russian torture methods at Stalingrad and even used in revenge after the war I would not repeat here. Suffice to say they gave the Pol Pot boys a good run for their money.4everhung said:I have admiration for both combatants on the eastern front.The eastern front was by far the most grueling theater of WWII with both armies displaying tremendous feats of tenacity and valor. You are quite incorrect though about German armor being both heavier and technologically superior to the Russian armor of '41-'42. The Soviets had both the KV-I and KV-II tanks which were behemoths compared to the German MK-IV tank(which at the time was the german 'heavy' tank though it was equiped which a shortbarreled 75MM gun suited for anti-personnel combat and thus its load out was primarily HE rounds with some HEAT rounds for anti-armor combat),in addition the Soviet T-34 was vastly superior to anything the germans fielded for the first 2+ years of combat..it wasn't until '43 when the tide had already turned against germany that they had the Tiger tank and then the Panthers,but by '44 the Soviets had thier own new class of heavy tanks. The germans won in the first 2 years because of superior tactics and elan. You are also mistaken when you label the entire german army as nazis. As a side note my g/f is Russian(from georgia) and I'm quite far form being a Nazi admirer.
..wrong again,throughout the entire war Russian production dwarfed Germany's..Hitler didn't even set the german economy into "total war" production until sometime about mid '43,when after the stalingrad catastrophe he realized germany was in deep shit.. i could go into production figure minutae(such as the Soviets were producing a T-34 tank about every 6 minutes)to illustrate my point,but I'm not really in the mood to cut and paste..I'll grant you that germany was indeed the beligerant when it invaded the USSR(though there is quite some debate about whether Stalin was also inclined to invade Germany eventually..after all the USSR and Nazi Germany did both carve up Poland in '39 and the Soviets invaded the vastly weaker Finland in '40..wonder how many 18 year old Finn's died protecting their border?). When the Soviets were overrunning german territory in '45 they were struck about how high the standard of living was for the germans and the Russian soldiers became more emboldened and determined because they felt anger over a nation which enjoyed such comparative oppulence had felt a need to invade such a relatively poor nation(for the average Russian citizen). So I attempt to understand both viewpoints in the conflict,but I'd really like to hear what you have to say about the Soviet invasion of Finland which predated Hitler's invasion of the USSR..And for the record the Finnish soldiers of WWII were the best of the war. I can elaborate,but in a nutshell they really smacked around the Russians though they were vastly,and I mean vastly outnumbered and out -equiped. One of the contributing reasons for Hitler's hunch that the Soviet Union might cave in easily came from his observation's of the dismal performance of the Red Army against little Finlandrevexrevex said:4everhung, ok you're right. Russians had superior technology. HOwever Germans had a superoir mode of production. Their war machine was at full swing as they swept the Western Europe. Their factories were creating death machines, while Russian soldiers were collecting wheat to make bread. Russians never thought that the Germans would EVEN DARE to attack them, imagine that denial that cost so many lives? Germans had an element of surprise, their individual soldiers were better armored with more provisions, and they were creating tanks and airplanes while the Soviet factories stood silent. Do you know how many 18 year old man "pogranichniki" who were protecting the border, died? They werent even armed, most of them, and germans slaughtered them all. I am educated enough to appreciate the accomplishments and valiency of the German special forces, so don't think I am so one sided. There were many heroes in the Nazi army, many accomplishments, all served for the wrong cause.
JavaGuru, you are an encyclopedia on the specifics of war. I always enjoy reading your posts, your knowledge is incredible.
..true about the Char B,and the French had about 3-4 other tanks that were superior to the best the Germans fielded(which was about 278 mark IVs)..at the outbreak the french had about 3200 tanks and the germans had 2500,of which about 2/3s of which were the light,vulnerable and trivially-armed PZ Is and IIs..you are quite correct about the french mis-using their armor..and though the French tanks were superiorly armed and armored,the great flaw in french tank design was that the turrets were small and the commander ahd to not only control the tank,but also serve/load and fire the gun..too much for one guy to do and at the same time deal with the new fast-paced warfare the germans were about to unleash on them..french tank design was as stuck in WWI mentality as their Maginot Line..for example,the Char B had a 47mm gun mounted in the turret,and a more impressive 75mm gun in the hull..problem was the hull mounted gun could be elevated and depressed,but not traversed;the whole tank had to be turned..and the driver served this gun so he too was overwhelmed... you can see that the french saw their armor as sort of mobile pillboxes and hence deployed them mostly scattred about infantry units..imagine the overworked commanders of these tanks dealing with concentrations of german armor moving about and deploying quickly..the french shit thier pantsJavaGuru said:As Napoleon is attributed to have said," The morale is to the physical as ten is to one." The German victories were based on superior tactics, training and their understanding of combined arms warfare. Even the French had a superior tank to the Wehrmacht in the form of the Charb1. German tanks couldn't penetrate its front armour and had to track it or ambush it for side/rear shots. Fortunately for the werhrmacht the french dispersed their armor as infantry support as opposed to concentrating it, one of a series of fatal mistakes.
The Republican said:
Shugard and Gordon were both Deltas.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










