hmm... where to begin...
there is a reason there is more focus on 'white history' (which is a quasi racist term to begin with), because like it or not, white men (even slave holders) were the backbone and founders of this country, its ideals, and its overal philosophy in government and life in general. it isn't some racist conspiracy, by 'the man', to focus on simply white people - it was white people that accomplished the majority of things that made this country great.
secondly, i don't see how any of you (phaded and lestat) can honestly say black people are still oppressed. oppressed by whom and how, may i ask?
and yes, the term african american is almost as dumb as italian american. why? because 99% of both groups were born and raised here, and most likely, never set foot in the country/continent their great, great, great, great, great-grandparents came from.
i'm a second generation immigrant from scotland, do i go around identifying myself as 'scottish-american'? uh, nope. why? because i was born in the US and identify was more with american culture than that of the scottish... oh yeah, and i don't need some label to somehow try to distinguish me from someone else.
the only people i consider african-american, mexican-american, italian-american, and any other labels of that sort are the people who were born in africa, mexico, and italy and legally migrated to the US.