Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

what's your IQ?

p0ink

New member
http://www.emode.com/tests/uiq/

Your IQ score is 135

At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is a Visionary Philosopher.

The first thing we can tell you about that is you're equally good at mathematical and verbal tasks, and learn best through experience. But that's just scratching the surface.
 
love these things.......
last IQ test was in 1985 and it was 163.


personally I don't believe the hype but I love filling out forms and questionaires.

Thanks for the link.
 
velvett said:
love these things.......
last IQ test was in 1985 and it was 163.




LOOKS- check

Brains- check

artistic talent- check

Kindness- check

Where are these faults that you mention?:confused: :angel:
 
haha this is so fucking bullcrap. It gave me a 117, this shit is stuff that you just know this ain't an IQ test. I scored over 150 on a REAL iq test.
 
Shit sorry, posted wrong info before this sight says 142...
This other site said 151: http://www.2h.com/iq-tests.html

Other tests from the site find me to be:
--Unattractive (73 out'a 100 total points).
--On the exactly the right career path!
--Left brained/visual--thus not terribly creative.
 
Last edited:
wow i scored kinda dumb.. i got a better result when i was a kid. i probably tried more then.. lol

it totally guessed my skillset properly though.

Your IQ score is 127

This number is the result of a formula based on how many questions you answered correctly on Emode's Ultimate IQ test.

The even better news is that at Emode, we've taken your IQ test one step further. During the test, you answered four different types of questions — mathematical, visual-spatial, linguistic and logical. We were able to analyze how you did on each set of those questions, which allows us to shed light on the way your brain uniquely functions.

At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is an Insightful Linguist.

The first thing we can tell you about that is you have the natural fluency of a writer and the visual and spatial strengths of an artist. Those skills contribute to your creative and expressive mind. But that's just scratching the surface.
 
Sex drive: I'm a Sunday driver...
But I am natural leader!

This has gotta be some government agency site or a band of Psych grad students trying to complete their research...
 
122, but I didn't really give a shit either. However it did tell me that I am an insightful linguist:

71% of Insightful Linguists would be more tempted to see their main squeeze covered in whipped cream, than eat an ice cream sundae covered in whipped cream.

wonder if this means I'm a cunning linguist too...
 
Your IQ score is 117

This number is the result of a formula based on how many questions you answered correctly on Emode's Ultimate IQ test.

The even better news is that at Emode, we've taken your IQ test one step further. During the test, you answered four different types of questions — mathematical, visual-spatial, linguistic and logical. We were able to analyze how you did on each set of those questions, which allows us to shed light on the way your brain uniquely functions.

At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is a Word Warrior.

The first thing we can tell you about that is you are equipped with a verbal arsenal that enables you to understand complex issues and communicate on a particularly high level. But that's just scratching the surface.
 
I'm going to go ahead and say this, and I'll probably catch flames and "you're just jealous you're stupid" comments, but anyone who says that their IQ is over 150 is either mistaken, full of shit, or took one of the non-conventional tests that provides for inflated scores.

And if I'm not mistaken, the best real measurement of IQ can only be performed when you're a child.
 
you are right bigguns... and the best one is the stanford-binet... altho iq does not measure success in life...
 
bigguns7 said:
I'm going to go ahead and say this, and I'll probably catch flames and "you're just jealous you're stupid" comments, but anyone who says that their IQ is over 150 is either mistaken, full of shit, or took one of the non-conventional tests that provides for inflated scores.


heh. Ur just jealous cause u dont have a 197 IQ like me mofo!!! :)
 
Anyone else notice that out Famous Members of the great State of Canada Scored Low ?

Govt Medical Care = Babies dropping on their heads
 
bigguns7 said:
I'm going to go ahead and say this, and I'll probably catch flames and "you're just jealous you're stupid" comments, but anyone who says that their IQ is over 150 is either mistaken, full of shit, or took one of the non-conventional tests that provides for inflated scores.

And if I'm not mistaken, the best real measurement of IQ can only be performed when you're a child.

I think overall your statement is accurate. However, you are mistaken if you say that anyone who says this is full of shit.

At 5 I tested 157, at 14 I tested 152, and at 23 I tested 156. All were professional tests. The first two when I was young had to do with my parents divorce and other things with school, I was tested at a professional facility. The one I took in law school, I took for other reasons. I wanted to make sure all that pot I smoked, did make me stooooopid. :lmao:
 
Yes, despite the incredibly large number of idiotic posts on this board Im sure that you are all well into the genius range IQ's. Just like everyone is 240 at 9%. Damn, you people are like the 1% of the population that resemble greek gods. If only I could be like you.
 
kronk said:


I think overall your statement is accurate. However, you are mistaken if you say that anyone who says this is full of shit.

At 5 I tested 157, at 14 I tested 152, and at 23 I tested 156. All were professional tests. The first two when I was young had to do with my parents divorce and other things with school, I was tested at a professional facility. The one I took in law school, I took for other reasons. I wanted to make sure all that pot I smoked, did make me stooooopid. :lmao:

Kronk, those are awesome scores. You're definitely the creme de la creme.

Here's something for you to think about that might shock you a little about the deterioration of your intelligence quotient. At age five, you probably took the Stanford-Binet test. That test is kind of the benchmark for child intelligence testing. That is/was probably your true IQ.

Now, David Wechsler sought to remove some of the linguistic and cultural biases of that test and thus was born the Wechsler Adult Intelliegence Scale, and the Wechlser Intelligence Scale for Children.

Now, in law school, you weren't given the Stanford Binet, you were probably given the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, on which you scored a still impressive 156. However, the WAIS is criticized for producing inflated scores, or rather scores that produce an inaccurate and non "apples-to-apples" comparison with the Stanford-Binet.

One reason that IQ scores of adults can't be accurately compared to those of children is that the three year difference in IQ from age 27-30 is totally different from the three year difference in IQ between ages 7-10.

So, it stands to reason that you should have scored higher (perhaps significantly) as an adult taking the Wechsler than you would have as a child taking the Stanford-Binet.

So, to make a long story short, the weed (or some other factor) has made you stupid over the years.
 
kronk said:


I think overall your statement is accurate. However, you are mistaken if you say that anyone who says this is full of shit.

At 5 I tested 157, at 14 I tested 152, and at 23 I tested 156. All were professional tests. The first two when I was young had to do with my parents divorce and other things with school, I was tested at a professional facility. The one I took in law school, I took for other reasons. I wanted to make sure all that pot I smoked, did make me stooooopid. :lmao:


So, what happened then Kronk? Or was Moderator you career aspiration?


lmao..
 
CrimsonKing said:



So, what happened then Kronk? Or was Moderator you career aspiration?


lmao..

HAHA, uhhh, no. After law school was over (or durning really), I got a job offer making much, much more money than I would have made in law. Since then I have been working in software sales.
 
bigguns7 said:
So, to make a long story short, the weed (or some other factor) has made you stupid over the years.

Thats what I thought, but then I forgot. Damn short term memory! LMAO :lmao:
 
kronk said:


HAHA, uhhh, no. After law school was over (or durning really), I got a job offer making much, much more money than I would have made in law. Since then I have been working in software sales.


Ohhh I get it now.. You make quota in the first 20 days of the quarter, then relax for the next 70 days surfing porn and the ef pages...

LMAO..

Great job... much better then Lawyer.. I'm now convinved that your IQ is in the 150's.. very smart career plan bro!

LMAO...
 
An overaged boy of thirty-nine has left the wing today.
The first time in his life he's made that step.
Be numbed by the society and plagued by insecurity.
He's entered in a race that must be won.
One of the animals has left its cage today
IN search of better things so it seems to be.
But in this land of polyurethane,
Things are apt to get a bit hot.
 
CrimsonKing said:
Ohhh I get it now.. You make quota in the first 20 days of the quarter, then relax for the next 70 days surfing porn and the ef pages...

LMAO! You dont know how true that is. I have already made 75% of annual quota, in the second month of the fiscal year. Now I can surf porn and ef for another 10 months. LOL.

Take care bro.
 
i am calling bs on damn near all of the scores i have read here.

if canadian oak is anything higher than moderately retarded the test must be full of crap.

i used to take those tests as a kiddie, too, and yes just like you fuckers they all said i was a genius. Odd thing is, though, I have met a SHITLOAD of people which claim they tested as geniuses, but NONE who took those tests and went to special ed.
 
Puc said:
i am calling bs on damn near all of the scores i have read here.

if canadian oak is anything higher than moderately retarded the test must be full of crap.

i used to take those tests as a kiddie, too, and yes just like you fuckers they all said i was a genius. Odd thing is, though, I have met a SHITLOAD of people which claim they tested as geniuses, but NONE who took those tests and went to special ed.


THERE YOU HAVE IT FOLKS.. STRAIGHT FROM THE MOUTH OF THAT KID CORKY FROM THE SHOW LIFE GOES ON!!!
 
quote from the test
"The first thing we can tell you about that is you've got a very experiential way of learning and a strong mathematical mind."

They havent seen my college transcript and how many times I've had to retake Calculus :D

Big thumbs down for the test....
 
dballer said:



THERE YOU HAVE IT FOLKS.. STRAIGHT FROM THE MOUTH OF THAT KID CORKY FROM THE SHOW LIFE GOES ON!!!

naw if i was that kid i would be fucking my own sister instead of yours
 
this fucking sucks!

Your IQ score is 133
At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is a Visual Mathematician.

The first thing we can tell you about that is you have a strong ability to process visual-spatial and mathematical information. But that's just scratching the surface.

a-typical male.........my computer crashed 1/2 way thru and i had to redo the test in about 2 minutes as i was impatient
 
Your IQ score is 124

At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is a Precision Processor.

The first thing we can tell you about that is you've got a very experiential way of learning and a strong mathematical mind. But that's just scratching the surface.



Works for me. Although, I'm not mathematical in the least, I'll have you know. :rolleyes:
 
Puc said:
i am calling bs on damn near all of the scores i have read here.

if canadian oak is anything higher than moderately retarded the test must be full of crap.

i used to take those tests as a kiddie, too, and yes just like you fuckers they all said i was a genius. Odd thing is, though, I have met a SHITLOAD of people which claim they tested as geniuses, but NONE who took those tests and went to special ed.

LMAO
 
velvett said:
love these things.......
last IQ test was in 1985 and it was 163.


personally I don't believe the hype but I love filling out forms and questionaires.

Thanks for the link.


OH A 163, SO THATS ABOUT 30 PTS OVER GENIUS LEVEL. :rolleyes:
 
I love these threads whenever they pop up.

Everybody has an IQ of over 130, with many over 150. ROFL.
100 is average. 130 is the top 98th percentile. Meaning 2% of people in the world fall into this category.

Looking at some of the grammar and intellectual quality of many of the posts on this site, none of you fall into the 98th percentile. IQ score drops drastically by age also. Somebody that is 30 years old claiming an IQ of 150 is full of shit. Sorry to burst this test's bubbles.

I seriously doubt there is more than one or two posters top on this site that have an IQ of more than 120.

Internet IQ tests are not accurate, and are created to cause a person to feel good. Not accuracy.
 
epimetheus said:
I love these threads whenever they pop up.

Everybody has an IQ of over 130, with many over 150. ROFL.
100 is average. 130 is the top 98th percentile. Meaning 2% of people in the world fall into this category.

Looking at some of the grammar and intellectual quality of many of the posts on this site, none of you fall into the 98th percentile. IQ score drops drastically by age also. Somebody that is 30 years old claiming an IQ of 150 is full of shit. Sorry to burst this test's bubbles.

I seriously doubt there is more than one or two posters top on this site that have an IQ of more than 120.

Internet IQ tests are not accurate, and are created to cause a person to feel good. Not accuracy.


EXACTLY! I GUESS EVERYONE ON THE BOARD IS OVER A 134 (WHICH I BELIEVE IS GENIUS LEVEL). WHAT LIARS! I GUESS ALL 2% OF THE GENIUS' ARE ON EF CHAT.:rolleyes:
 
actually no, thats not true at all.

80-120 range = average intelligence
121-150 is above average
150+ is considered to possess a genius-level intelligence, but is NOT a genius
180= Genius

you can also be a genius is the 160-180 rabge, but more often than not you simply posses genius level intelligence, but are not completely there
 
kronkette said:
actually no, thats not true at all.

80-120 range = average intelligence
121-150 is above average
150+ is considered to possess a genius-level intelligence, but is NOT a genius
180= Genius


According to who?

80-90 IQ score on a standardized intelligence test with a mean score of 100 would qualify as below average intelligence.

Theres no common consensus within the cognitive psychological community as to which quantative criteria qualify an individual as having 'genius' level intelligence. However, as statistical frequency of a quantified intelligence score decreases within a random population, scientific consensus as to whether 'genius level' intelligence criteria has been met, increases.


Nobody is going to tell an individual with a certified 170 IQ, they dont possess 'genius' level intelligence.

To put that in perspective. The prevelance of a 170 IQ score in a random population sample is 1 in 160,000 http://www.eskimo.com/~miyaguch/combnorm.html

Assuming the United States aggregate national population exhibits a bell distribution of intelligence across all persons, 1875 US citizens would score at or above 170 IQ.

Which is why 160+IQ sounds alittle far fetched. But hey. Ive got a 10 inch cock. So its all good ;)
 
I just blazed a fattie and I scored 173. Far fucking out.

If i took this test straight, I'd score in the 120's probably.
 
Taps said:
I just blazed a fattie and I scored 173. Far fucking out.

If i took this test straight, I'd score in the 120's probably.

Now thats the best answer yet! You gave me an idea.....:havoc:
 
138

I know for a fact that I could have only missed two at the most (numbers 37 and number 40 - couldn't figure them out with one positive answer).

so either those two are scaled to be very heavy in weight, or the test isn't scaled properly.

either way, yay.
 
smallmovesal said:
wow i scored kinda dumb.. i got a better result when i was a kid. i probably tried more then.. lol

it totally guessed my skillset properly though.

Your IQ score is 127

This number is the result of a formula based on how many questions you answered correctly on Emode's Ultimate IQ test.

The even better news is that at Emode, we've taken your IQ test one step further. During the test, you answered four different types of questions - mathematical, visual-spatial, linguistic and logical. We were able to analyze how you did on each set of those questions, which allows us to shed light on the way your brain uniquely functions.

At the same time, we compared your answers with others who have taken the test, and according to the sorts of questions you got correct, we can tell your Intellectual Type is an Insightful Linguist.

The first thing we can tell you about that is you have the natural fluency of a writer and the visual and spatial strengths of an artist. Those skills contribute to your creative and expressive mind. But that's just scratching the surface.

If that's you in your avatar I wouldn't worry about what an online test says.

See, now that's passing an iq test. Or is it? I have to go lie down, my head hurts.
 
HappyScrappy said:
138

I know for a fact that I could have only missed two at the most (numbers 37 and number 40 - couldn't figure them out with one positive answer).

so either those two are scaled to be very heavy in weight, or the test isn't scaled properly.

either way, yay.


ur losing it pal :)
 
kronkette said:
actually no, thats not true at all.

80-120 range = average intelligence
121-150 is above average
150+ is considered to possess a genius-level intelligence, but is NOT a genius
180= Genius

you can also be a genius is the 160-180 rabge, but more often than not you simply posses genius level intelligence, but are not completely there

Really? According to WHAT test? Internet tests? Bah, do you really think MENSA is going to accept an Internet test, bolstered up so that numbers look and sound impressive? To make the test taker feel good about themselves?

The leading scale used is the Standford-Binet scale. According to this site the scale is similar, but the percentiles are wrong from what I even put.

85 - 114 Average
115 - 124 Above average
125 - 134 Gifted University
135 - 144 Highly gifted
145 - 154 Genius
155 - 164 Genius
165 - 179 High genius
180 - 200 Highest genius
>200 "Unmeasurable" genius

And I quote from this site:
Only approximately 1% of the people in the world have an IQ of 135 or over.

So people on this site follow the current trend. (8 inch dick, 250 5% bf, 150 IQ) LOL, please. Sure, all you putting 130+ fall into that 1%. Some of you sure, its possible, but I doubt most people posting here fall into the 98th percentile or higher, otherwise you would be a MENSA member. Hell, some of the LAW students here have terrible grammar and can't spell or use puncuation, and Law students are supposed to be the Creme de la Creme. I doubt they are anywhere near the 98th percentile.

Some interesting reading:

IQ's of great minds
Brain.com

The IQ test is wrong. If everybody here, except one or two people had the score they claimed, this would be the MENSA message board, not the Elite fitness chat board. Again, that inflated stat thing strikes again.
 
CHANMAN said:



OH A 163, SO THATS ABOUT 30 PTS OVER GENIUS LEVEL. :rolleyes:


Oh please - bite me.

Take it up with Hofstra University that did the test and my father that hold his prized fucking possession of papers for him to know how "smart" his kid is - but clearly too lazy in his eyes.

So if I haven't made myself perfectly clear.

:doublefi:




FYI - percentiles change year to year as testing and people can't remain constant. So what was in 1985 will not be what is in 2002 and besides - HIGH IQ does not mean a thing - it will make no guarantees as to a person's success or failure.
 
velvett said:

HIGH IQ does not mean a thing - it will make no guarantees as to a person's success or failure.

Too True.

What age were you when you took your IQ test? Which test was it? 163 is really high, so of course it sounds like BS. If you were 10 or younger when you took it, 163, while still impressive, isn't the same as a 25 year old getting that score. (or however old you are)

163 is genius, Einstien is said to only have 160, think about what you are claiming. Potential or not, I doubt very much if you took the stanford-binet test you would get that high of a score.
 
epimetheus said:


Really? According to WHAT test? Internet tests? Bah, do you really think MENSA is going to accept an Internet test, bolstered up so that numbers look and sound impressive? To make the test taker feel good about themselves?

The leading scale used is the Standford-Binet scale. According to this site the scale is similar, but the percentiles are wrong from what I even put.

85 - 114 Average
115 - 124 Above average
125 - 134 Gifted University
135 - 144 Highly gifted
145 - 154 Genius
155 - 164 Genius
165 - 179 High genius
180 - 200 Highest genius
>200 "Unmeasurable" genius

And I quote from this site:


So people on this site follow the current trend. (8 inch dick, 250 5% bf, 150 IQ) LOL, please. Sure, all you putting 130+ fall into that 1%. Some of you sure, its possible, but I doubt most people posting here fall into the 98th percentile or higher, otherwise you would be a MENSA member. Hell, some of the LAW students here have terrible grammar and can't spell or use puncuation, and Law students are supposed to be the Creme de la Creme. I doubt they are anywhere near the 98th percentile.

Some interesting reading:

IQ's of great minds
Brain.com

The IQ test is wrong. If everybody here, except one or two people had the score they claimed, this would be the MENSA message board, not the Elite fitness chat board. Again, that inflated stat thing strikes again.

boy, you're awfully crabby today.
 
velvett said:



Oh please - bite me.

Take it up with Hofstra University that did the test and my father that hold his prized fucking possession of papers for him to know how "smart" his kid is - but clearly too lazy in his eyes.


K. if your father was half as smart as he thinks he is, he would realize how truly special you are, and how great you turned out.:)
 
TheProject said:


boy, you're awfully crabby today.

:D

Nah, just something that annoys me. People ALWAYS claim high IQ, it never fails. Strange really, all my friends claim 120+ IQ, many claim 140+, yet none know what they are really claiming, they just think they are saying they are above average. I would imagine half of them have never actually taken a REAL IQ test, just some internet junk.

So if 85-114 is average, where are all the people that fall on the low scale? It is bullshit, see? People don't put thier real IQ, just as women don't like to put thier real age.
1% of the world above 135, yet looking at this thread, it would seem that really intelligent people bodybuild and spend thier days on message boards, instead of reading Milton or something. I can see a high percent of people comming in at 120+ at a local university or something, but a message board where they are "too lazy" to use proper grammer, puncuation or use proper paragraphs?

I'm not grumpy or grouchy today, this just happens to be one topic of bullshit I find to annoy me the most. That and crackpot people claiming aliens are comming from 100 light years away to probe somewhat intelligent monkeys in the arse.

Yeah, high IQ scores really don't denote much. Everybody is different when it comes to how thier brain works. A standard test to compare each person is a bit silly. Intelligence doesn't mean squat if all a person uses it for is to flaunt it around making themselves feel important.
 
epimetheus -

I was 14 and it was for the high school I was in - long story.
I had to take it and took it under protest.

I don't remember the name of test quite honestly, perhaps Hofstra still does them. From what I remember there were multiple choice questions, english, math, history and red white and black cubes.

The results have done nothing for me in my life except for the following school year when the principal started treating me like a human being.

I still get a kick out of the goofball tests you can take on the internet but again it's just for fun.
 
Funny I "claimed" a mid 160's and yet you wanna go after a female who stated the same thing??

Some chick fuck you over or what??

Bring that shit to me....
 
jeez chill people

Which doesn't belong?
a) balls
b) nads
c) jewels
d) little guys
e) It's a fuckin internet test which isn't accurate enough that McDonald's would hire you based off it!!!

:fro:
 
Corn, you are just jealous because my new avatar has such a cool haircut.

BTW. i´m going to use your diet advice in 2 weeks, i hope its better than your sense of humour ;)
 
my mum gives those tests.

i just asked her... if you are older, you likely have "crystalized knowlege" and you'll score higher. numbers vary on what test you take, and apparently those who score between 120 and 130 tend to do more successfully in career, etc. according to studies.

below 55 trainably retarded
55-74 is educably retarded
75-99 low average
100-110 is average
110-120 still average (i forget what type)
121-130 is high average
131-140 gifted
and it goes on... some tests say 150 is genius some is 160
 
epimetheus said:
Only approximately 1% of the people in the world have an IQ of 135 or over.

Just out of curiousity, how was that conclusion made?

If IQ is supposedly measured best when someone is a child, what did they do? Get a bunch of children from all over the world, make them take an IQ test, and then guess that the rest of the world must be the same?

Oh yeah... do you know of any online IQ test whose results may be even remotely comparable to that of the Standford-Binet test? I am curious about my "actual" I.Q., since I do consider myself to be at least "somewhat" above average intelligence (*grin from ear to ear*), but, due to that "somewhat" above average intelligence, I'm not going to pay somebody to tell me how smart I am.

-Warik
 
smallmovesal said:
my mum gives those tests.

i just asked her... if you are older, you likely have "crystalized knowlege" and you'll score higher. numbers vary on what test you take, and apparently those who score between 120 and 130 tend to do more successfully in career, etc. according to studies.

below 55 trainably retarded
55-74 is educably retarded
75-99 low average
100-110 is average
110-120 still average (i forget what type)
121-130 is high average
131-140 gifted
and it goes on... some tests say 150 is genius some is 160




George Bush scored 54 huh.

Sure he made no mistakes about it.
 
Cornholio said:
Funny I "claimed" a mid 160's and yet you wanna go after a female who stated the same thing??

Some chick fuck you over or what??

Bring that shit to me....

Sorry, I must have missed that. If you got mid 160's on this test, that is understandable, seeing how inaccurate it is.
It is possible velvett scored this high, it just screams bs, thats all. A 160 IQ is very rare. If you say you scored 160 on the S-B test I would not believe you.(without proof) Not to say your not intelligent, just that your probably not a genius with 160 score. .009% of people can claim 160, which probably works out to like 10k people in the world. Do you really claim to be one of those 10,000? Are you a MENSA member? Do they harrass you to join? They would if you scored 160 on the S-B.

Smalls: There are several tests, with a bit of variance. The chart I quoted is correct for the Stanford-binet. Dunno what test your chart is. I am pretty certain that children score higher than adults on the stanford-binet test.

Warik: There isn't an internet version of the S-B. It is taken in person, one on one(no way to cheat). It is also timed. I am sure there are some somewhat accurate IQ tests, but I don't know of any that come close to the ones that matter. Might try Brain.com, they have quite a few links to IQ tests.
The 1% is based on an average of people that score that high. Of all the people that take that IQ test, only 1% of the people get 135 or higher. The link I thought I posted that had that quote must have gotten misplaced. I will repost it.


On the Internet, anybody can claim anything. You want me to believe it, prove it.
 
Last edited:
velvett said:

HIGH IQ does not mean a thing - it will make no guarantees as to a person's success or failure.

Not really. Assuming 'individual success' is defined by the accumulation of monetary wealth - a high IQ increases the probability an individual will be able to efficently integrate and process increased amounts of information associated with working in a capitalistic economy.

Take the two extremes. Which individual is more likely to enjoy monetary succecss, a person with a 60 IQ or a 160 IQ?

Yes, a high IQ doesnt cause people to become successfull. But a high IQ *significantly* increases the probability individual monetary success will be achieved.

Btw, current IQ tests do not test purely factual knowledge, or historical knowledge. I just find it really hard to believe some people (corn, velvette) have legitimate 160+ IQ scores. Possible, but hey.
 
Last edited:
buddy28
epimetheus



I don't take well to being called a liar - so believe me it will be MY pleasure to try and prove it. Could take a while, would mean I would have to speak to father whom I have not spoken to in 4 years, entering a house 3 hours away but let me tell you it will be so worth it.

Oh and btw epimetheus - Hofstra University was after me to take more tests for some time - but if you knew anything about me you would know that to me at that time the whole situation meant being different than everybody else and what most teenagers want, is to be just like everybody else.

SO, in laymen's term YOU DON'T KNOW JACK, Jack.
 
....nice way to avoid my main point about picking on a woman for saying the same thing a man said....

Very classy.
 
btw - if 1-2 % of the population is "gifted" then anywhere form 400-600 people on EF qualify......why do you think that 4-5 people posting is so unbelievable??
 
Corn: So, genius, how do you PICK on a woman on a message board? I certainly cannot force myself upon her by size. Apparently her Intellect is higher than mine by over 50 points, so I don't think I could touch her in a debate. Or you apparently either. :rolleyes:

I didn't see your post, I only saw Velvets post because somebody copy and pasted it and it was big and black. Sue me if I find it boring watching people brag about how high thier IQ score is, when they can hardly form a coherent sentence. (not you or velvet either) I only "picked" on her, as you say, because she claimed she was a Genius. With a Ungodly score.

Granted, I don't know what she does for a living, what kind of books she destroys (because at that IQ, challenging material would be hard to find), or much about her except what I see on this message board. Nothing I have seen suggests she has Einstiens Intellect either. Or you for that matter.

Sure, you both are funny, witty, and I have always thought you intelligent, but two people on this message board that are that much of a genius? Possible, but highly unlikely. Unlikely enough I would put large sums of money on it. Stanford-Binet test anyhow, which is tougher than an internet test.

Anyhow, this horse is pretty much dead, so beating it is pointless. It doesn't matter what you claim your IQ is, just as it doesn't matter if you claim to have a 9" tool. It is the INTERNET, few people probably believe it anyhow, and if you did really have an IQ of 160, you probably wouldn't care to brag about it, you would be pontificating on some deep subject, reading some science journals, composing a song, or writing a dissertation on a new theory you have about wavelength modulations in light on a crystal or some crap.

Is that picking on somebody? Does that satisfy you corn? That I can "pick" on somebody besides a girl? You gonna come to my house and "try" to beat me up for saying that I think it unlikely you really are a genius of Einstiens caliber? Or should I just do the PC thing and let you claim an ungodly IQ, after all, it doesn't really matter does it?

I am 250 6'4, 5% bodyfat with a 9 inch dick, 180 IQ, Ph.D in Theoretical Physics, I have 5 Scientific discoveries, and if you say I am full of shit, I am going to get all Pissy and Ban you.
 
Pick on whomever you please to make yourself feel better....

Iq doesn't mean shit in the real world..

Why in the world would anyone lie about it???

You have an attitude problem - just calling it like I see it

Ban you??

Over what??

Being a dick ??- Ef would lose half it's members...including 200 genius-level iq's.....hehehehe
 
Well, since everyone on this board is eligible for MENSA and most other High IQ Societies, let's all go over and join at once. We could change the face of MENSA as the greatest band of genius bodybuilders to ever roam the earth.
 
lol


Mensa - what a joke.

It's like being a member of Sam's Club I imagine...
 
epimetheus said:


...If you say you scored 160 on the S-B test I would not believe you.(without proof) Not to say your not intelligent, just that your probably not a genius with 160 score. .009% of people can claim 160, which probably works out to like 10k people in the world. Do you really claim to be one of those 10,000?

The world's population is greater than 1B people (10K is ~.009% of 1B), so this more like a 1 in 550,000 event. So, say the entire state of Vermont...

epimetheus said:

...The 1% is based on an average of people that score that high. Of all the people that take that IQ test, only 1% of the people get 135 or higher. The link I thought I posted that had that quote must have gotten misplaced. I will repost it.

No...the standard deviation on the S-B is 16, with a mean of 100. So, you hit 98th percentile at 132 (not 99th at 135), I think 1% is somewhere in the low 140's. Keep in mind there are >5.5B people on the planet and 2% of this number is still a very big number.
 
Well, since everyone on this board is eligible for MENSA and most other High IQ Societies, let's all go over and join at once. We could change the face of MENSA as the greatest band of genius bodybuilders to ever roam the earth.
I
n the library they had a CD once with some IQ tests from Mensa and a time limit on them, i scored about 120 , so i´m probably the only one too stupid for Mensa on the board. i feel so left out now :bawling:
 
For those that think that velvett is lying or exaggerating, you have obviously never spoken with her. She is probably the most together person on this board. I promise you she does not need your approval or anyone else's for that matter. She has her faults, just like everyone, but no one will ever accuse her of being a liar.
If she says she scored a 163 then I believe her, and you know what? It doesn't change one damn thing about her. She is still this incredible lady who can make anyone feel like they are special.
 
Norman Bates said:
What´s a sprocket? Does it contain protein?

oh damn. it's an old skit from saturday night live... supposed to be a weird german tv show.

i believe velvett... she definitely could have scored that high.
 
How about we all sit down to some nice wiener schnitzel and red cabbage and sing a happy song - shall we?

:goof:
 
Top Bottom