Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
.jpg "Research Chemical Sciences")
.png "Research Chemical Sciences")
What would your ideal size/weight be?
- Thread starter abolish the weak
- Start date
abolish the weak
New member
ceo said:
It's a huge difference, because you can tack on 5-10 lbs of weight for every 1" of additional height. Therefore I could prolly carry this at 6'2" and be comfortbale
redshirt27se
New member
i'd add 10-15lbs and be cut
as it is i'm at a low BF, and happy with my body, but in a perfect world that'd be the case. no more than 15lbs though, because even if cut it wouldn't be aesthetic. i have no desire to resemble a mr. o competitor.
as it is i'm at a low BF, and happy with my body, but in a perfect world that'd be the case. no more than 15lbs though, because even if cut it wouldn't be aesthetic. i have no desire to resemble a mr. o competitor.
In an ideal world where I wouldn't have to maintain a huge drug regime, I'd love to be around 260 at 5'11" and in good cardio shape -- whether that's 15% or 7%, I wouldn't really care, just able to do an easy 8 minute mile with no problem.
In the real world, however, probably a lean 220. The older I've gotten, the more I realize the importance of good cardio health, so I would rather sacrifice some size in order to be able to go up a half-dozen flights of stairs without gasping for breath. It must suck to be Greg Kovacs. There totally exists this healthy middle ground, and he's proof that size isn't the be-all and end-all.
In the real world, however, probably a lean 220. The older I've gotten, the more I realize the importance of good cardio health, so I would rather sacrifice some size in order to be able to go up a half-dozen flights of stairs without gasping for breath. It must suck to be Greg Kovacs. There totally exists this healthy middle ground, and he's proof that size isn't the be-all and end-all.
Similar threads
