Any aas you would use for a cutting cycle, if fat loss is your goal with the gh that is.
If your goal is muscle growth, then any aas you would use for a bulking cycle.
You took the words right out of my keyboard! I've been researching like crazy on this. Some say IGF-1 is better than GH and to just go with that. So, opinions, what say you?
And regardless of which is better, is stacking it with test cyp a good idea?
Cyp, enanthate, prop, it really doesn't matter. The steroid and the GH are working independently. The effects of GH are so subtle compared to the effects of test that it's more like window dressing than a strong component of the cycle.
Cyp, enanthate, prop, it really doesn't matter. The steroid and the GH are working independently. The effects of GH are so subtle compared to the effects of test that it's more like window dressing than a strong component of the cycle.
Just wondering, would that depend on injection method. If you are doing sub-q for fat loss I can see your point. But what about IM for muscle growth? I have wondered about that. People always say you should stack gh or it is not as good. But what you said fits more of what I was thinking.
Cyp, enanthate, prop, it really doesn't matter. The steroid and the GH are working independently. The effects of GH are so subtle compared to the effects of test that it's more like window dressing than a strong component of the cycle.
Just wondering, would that depend on injection method. If you are doing sub-q for fat loss I can see your point. But what about IM for muscle growth? I have wondered about that. People always say you should stack gh or it is not as good. But what you said fits more of what I was thinking.
The method of injection doesn't make a difference one way or the other. The best thing to use for size with GH is insulin. But that's for people with more experience.