Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Volume Training

Kabeetz said:
Don't tell him to STFU he can give his opinion to his training partner all he wants. Especially when he's right.

Regardless... Rican - this board is pretty biased against volume training, with good reason, but at the very least there is nothing wrong with trying different stuff in order to find what works and doesn't work for you and your body and what you enjoy.

You forgot to bold this part...
 
Rican, 5x5 IS volume training, man. Today, people get confused about the true definition of volume, much like they fuck up what intensity actually means or is supposed to mean. Intensity is % of 1 rep max, end of story. Not some abstract way to tire yourself out.

Volume, is total workload. You take weight and multiply by reps and then multiply by sets for workload, that's volume. It's very black and white and very easy to guage progress by your constants and variables. If you run 5x5 sets of straight weight at 85% on the squat, that is a lot of freaking volume, 6x5 or 7x5 makes it even more. Think German volume training, the Smolov/Russian squat program, and 5x5. Volume isn't cramming 10lbs of shit in a 5lb bag. Doing 10x10 on the squat is more volume in 1 day than somebody does in an entire month by working up to 1 set of 8 in the squat and doing 57 sets of leg presses, leg curls, leg extensions, machine hack squats, and who knows what else other machine in the gym.

Volume is just workload.....reasonable workload, don't check common sense at the door. 5x5 at 85% on the bench is more volume than 100 sets of 100 with 2.5lb dumbells, lol....but you know what I mean, bro.

Total work is what is meant by volume, not the amount of useless exercises you can conjure up.
 
Kabeetz said:
Don't tell him to STFU he can give his opinion to his training partner all he wants. Especially when he's right.

Regardless... Rican - this board is pretty biased against volume training, with good reason, but at the very least there is nothing wrong with trying different stuff in order to find what works and doesn't work for you and your body and what you enjoy.

oh he's right is he? What are you accreditations? Nasm would disagree with you as well as science. Where are your pics at again??
 
Neo22 said:
oh he's right is he? What are you accreditations? Nasm would disagree with you as well as science. Where are your pics at again??

I'm interested to hear this "science" also...
 
NASM???? NASM is one of the best personal trainer certifications out there.... but to take what nasm preaches as bible, you're crazy. How many great powerlifters are NASM? More importantly, how many of the great Olympic coaches are NASM certified? Many of these people have doctorates, NASM doesn't hold up too well against a Ph.D.

These principles have been proven by athletes outperforming competition year after year, not by passing a certification test.

Bill Starr.
Mark Rippletoe.
Glenn Pendlay.
Louie Simmons.
Gayle Hatch.
etc.
etc.
etc.

Do these names ring any bells to you at all? I promise you they would each piss on a NASM certification, and they certainly wouldn't hang it in the biggest frame in their office. Buy Starting Strength, buy Practical Programming, thoroughly read the site and associated links at http://www.geocities.com/elitemadcow1/5x5_Program/Linear_5x5.htm
Visit http://www.msbn.tv/usavision/

Watch Mike Miller squat 1200+ pounds or Mariusz win a World's Strongest Man competition, or my man Pyros Dymas grab the gold.

These men are accomplishing these amazing tactics through varieties of strength training, not through the great Joe Weider and his "principles".
 
Top Bottom