Steroidsteve
New member
Hey i need some help with anadrol. It's half life is 8-9 hours I've read so should I be taking 50mg every 8-9 hours? ATM I'm taking 50 mg at 9am an 9pm is that enough? For some reason I thought it lasted longer
It's funny. When I did interviews with the pros in the 90's they'd talk about drol like it was so hardcore. Lots of guys thought it was too much. Most would break a tab in half and that'd be their daily dosage. And now you have regular guys asking if 100 mgs is enough. Either everyone has lost their mind, forgot how to train, or the shit today is severely underdosed.
I read a book in the late 80's, when I was doing some research on AAS, called, "The Practical Use of Anabolic Steroids With Athletes" written by Dr. Robert Kerr. Dr. Kerr prescribed steroids of all kinds to athletes, starting back in the 60's. It was a great book in that it was what the title said. A look into the practical use of AAS with Athletes. It was written in the early 80's Can't find the book anywhere anymore.
Dr. Kerr used to prescribe steroids to thousands of athletes. He claimed to have prescribed them to many Olympic Athletes as well. Anyway, he prescribed Anadrol at 50mg, twice a day...long before the 90's.
Kerr was a nutjob. And he had an agenda of creating ultimate performance in competitive athletes. In other words, winning is all that matters. And Kerr himself dropped dead at 65.
Bottom line, Drol is a shitty drug with weak receptor acceptance. THAT is why it's 50 mgs. But that's 50 17AA mgs. Why not use a drug that is more potent? I have to laugh when people complain about Dbol bloat -- which is nothing compared to Anadrol bloat.
The bloat from dbol and the bloat from anadrol are 2 totally different things.
The bloat from D-Bol is from estrogen, don't forget that.. and it is water between the muscle and the skin.
The bloat from Drol is not estrogen related, and is water inside of the muscle.
Which bloat is worse is debatable.. some get it worse from drol, some get it worse from dbol. I personally do not bloat too much from drol, even at 100mg a day. I like dbol, but prefer drol over it.
Maybe if you ran anadrol, you would love it. But you have never touched the stuff, so you don't really know how you would react. So your thoughts on it is more speculation. But I can understand your reasons for not wanting to run it, because you choose your health over all other things, and anadrol can be quite toxic.. which is understandable.
You're partly right. You forgot to mention that the bloat for drol is progesterone relation, which is worse becuae estrogen is more easily controlled. As far as the qater being INSIDE the muscle with drol, that's just not so. All water is partly in the muscle and party subcutanous.
And you admit it's toxic, so why use it if other less toxic substances are just as good? I don't understand that.
If you look more into it, you will find that more people bloat from dbol than drol.. there is a big difference in the type of bloat.
Yes Drol is toxic, that is a no brainer. But I think it is much better than dbol. Much much better.
Have you ever used 100 mgs of D-bol a day?
The mg for mg argument isn't really relevant. They are two different compounds.
I've used them both, and can compare them based on my experience.
Have you used them both? No. So your comparison is based on speculation. Maybe you would be the kind of person that reacts very well to drol.. but you will never know, because you won't try it.
Actually it's entirely relevant. How can you say drol is better when you never used a comparable amount?
No, I never used drol but I don't have to. I know quite a bit of the science behind it and know of thousands of examples of those using it. I never used rat poison either and I don't have to use it to know what it does, so that's a silly comparison.
No, it's not relevant. So lets compare oral tren to d-bol. So since it is measured in mcg.. it would be what.. 1000 weaker, mg for mg? Or does that not count?
How can you say drol is worse when you've never used it?! At least my comparison is based on real life experience, not something I googled.
That's funny. yeah, I googled it. Ironically, most of the stuff you would google I WROTE.
But...whatever, I'm not in the mood to argue. You're probably right.

It's funny. When I did interviews with the pros in the 90's they'd talk about drol like it was so hardcore. Lots of guys thought it was too much. Most would break a tab in half and that'd be their daily dosage. And now you have regular guys asking if 100 mgs is enough. Either everyone has lost their mind, forgot how to train, or the shit today is severely underdosed.
Here is a quick cut and paste that is all over the internet.
"The recommended daily dose in children and adults is 1-5 mg/kg of body weight per day. The usual effective dose is 1-2 mg/kg/day but higher doses may be required, and the dose should be individualized. Response is not often immediate, and a minimum trial of three to six months should be given. Following remission, some patients may be maintained without the drug; others may be maintained on an established lower daily dosage. A continued maintenance dose is usually necessary in patients with congenital aplastic anemia."
So you can see that 100mg is not a high dose at all for a 200 lb man, on the contrary it is rather conservative. If I took the high end of the recommended dose I'd be at 440mg a day of pharmaceutical grade drol, not the UGL 100mg a day I just got done with. I personally don't like Anadrol because even at 200mg a day I didn't see any noticeable gains. This is my second run with it and I'm not gonna waste my time again, I get much better results from Dbol or Winstrol.
Kerr was a nutjob. And he had an agenda of creating ultimate performance in competitive athletes. In other words, winning is all that matters. And Kerr himself dropped dead at 65.
Bottom line, Drol is a shitty drug with weak receptor acceptance. THAT is why it's 50 mgs. But that's 50 17AA mgs. Why not use a drug that is more potent? I have to laugh when people complain about Dbol bloat -- which is nothing compared to Anadrol bloat.
Per kg of body weight! I know you don't like Anadrol even though you have never used it, but don't make shit up to try and make me look foolish.
That nutjob prescribed steroids to 20 some odd medal winners at the 1984 olympics. I'd say he created some ultimate performance alright. He said he started prescribing to athletes because he learned they were getting black market steroids off the street. He felt getting clean, uncut pharmaceutical compounds and being monitored by a physician would be safer. What he ultimately learned was that the athletes were taking his prescriptions and still getting the black market AAS to increase the dosages or add additional compounds. His dosage recommendations weren't all that high. I seem to recall he had low recommendations for deca and var. I'll look them up later in my notes.
I'm not making shit up bro. And it has nothing to do with whether I use it or not. I'm not some kid who just discovered the site. I've been writing on the topic for the last 20 years.
I misunderstood your comparisons. But 2 mgs per kg for a child? I'm calling bullshit on that. I'd like to see that recommendation. So a 90 pound kid would be getting prescribed 80 mgs of drol a day? For WHAT? I think you're very mistaken. But oh wait, you cut and paste it from the internet. So it MUST be true!
I'm aware he created winners, but so what? Steroids help with athletic performance. Everyone knows that. It doesn't matter if the guy drops dead afterward. His reasoning was also flawed.
At any rate we can go back and forth on this all day. Maybe I'm old. I've heard too many guys boast about how this and that is "not so bad" and they wound up dead or on dialysis. Fuck, I'm not talking out of my ass here. I LIKE steroids and advocate their usage. But when guys start thinking that 50 mgs is okay, then guys start thinking 100 mgs is okay and 150 isn't that bad, and why not 200 and on and on it goes and they keep forgetting that the effects don't hit you right away.
But maybe what really bugs me is knowing that anyone who uses that much, and isn't on a pro level, is not a real bodybuilder and is just expecting the drugs to do most of the work. But that's me. To each his own.
200mg a day? I think you're on to something
200mg a day? I think you're on to something
I googled therapeutic dose of Oxymetholone and that same dosing protocol comes up everywhere! I guess all of those medical and rx sites that have nothing to do with body building are all conspiring to kill off us stupid juice heads. You are an extremely self absorbed hard headed man. I know you are a seasoned body builder and steroid user but you have no personal experience with this compound, so you should put aside your unfounded bias.
Ok Nelson, first I never referenced children or the possible dose a doctor would prescribe them. I don’t care about dosing for a child because I'm a 35 year old 195lb man, and the last time I checked this site and the other ones I'm active on don't condone steroid use by children.
...................
DO YOU EVEN READ YOUR OWN BULLSHIT? THIS IS THE FORST SENTANCE YOU POSTED. "The recommended daily dose in children and adults is 1-5 mg/kg of body weight per day."
AND THAT IS WHAT I WAS RESPONDING TO.
............
Again your second comment is a crude attempt to twist my words to make me look dumb. I said you need to put aside your bias, you have a hatred for any compound that is considered "wet". We get it wet compounds aren't your thing, you like dryer compounds and that's just fine, for you.
.........................
WRONG AGAIN. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THAT AND IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH WHAT I LIKE. (AND I LIKE D-BOL WHICH IS CERTAINLY NOT A DRY COMPOUND). I'M JUST REPORTING THE FACTS.
...............................
We all have different goals with steroid use so just because a compound doesn't help you meet those goals, it doesn't make it a bad compound.
........................
NO, BUT IF IT HAS BAD SIDES, IT HAS BAD SIDES. AGAIN , THAT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PERSONAL PREFERENCE. YOU'RE THINKING LIKE A TEENAGER -- WHAT THEY DON'T LIKE THEY THINK SUCKS. I'M WAY PAST THAT BRO.
...........................................
And to expand on your second comment, it's very obvious you haven't done any research on Anadrol.
........................
WELL, YOU'RE SHOWING YOUR IGNORANCE AGAIN. I'VE BEEN WRITING ABOUT STEROIDS SINCE BEFORE THE INTERNET. I'VE BEEN PUSBLISHED. MANY TIMES OVER. SINCE BEFORE YOU WERE OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL.
QUIT WHILE YOU'RE AHEAD BRO. YOU'RE NOT TALKING TO SOME MEATHEAD AT THE GYM.
...............................
You are just regurgitating the same bro science bullshit you've been hearing for years. I've both researched and used Anadrol, so easy on calling me clueless, bro.
...............
YEAH, THAT'S RIGHT. I'M REGURGITATING THE STUFF THAT I HEARD FROM PEOPLE WHO STUDIED MY WORK. LOL!!!
JESUS FUCKBALLS I GET REALLY TIRED OF DEALING WITH GUYS LIKE YOU.
So should I do 200 mg a day or 400?
The same thing that happens if you take any steroid without doing a PCT. You risk the possibility of not recovering and losing all of your gainsWhat happens if you take drol without a PCT?
Sent from my iPhone using EliteFitness.com - Anabolic Steroids, Bodybuilding
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










