heatherrae said:Yeah, that is exactly what I meant. They can detain, but before interrogating they have to mirandize for the statements to be admissable. They mention in the end that some statements pre-miranda but post custodial detention can be admissible but the only exception that I recall of this sort was when the defendant made statements on his/her own without any questioning, and, of course, name and address.
So, I think we agree.![]()
TITCR, I'm just too ignorant of the subject to express things correctly, lol.
