True or False

[chestmaster1]

So whats the deal with the Elitefitness e-mail saying that AIFM gets a D, Does it really block the Androgen recepter and inhibit gains as much as they claim?

 

[surferstar]

So whats the deal with the Elitefitness e-mail saying that AIFM gets a D, Does it really block the Androgen recepter and inhibit gains as much as they claim?

Using it right now like this:
2-3 times a week
2 pumps per use on top of foot
Results:
Dry and gynoless

Many people have been getting very bad reactions from it.
as of right now i would strongly suggest adex.

 

[chestmaster1]

thanks for the response but I've used and don't get any rashes or any bad reactions from it, but i was just wondering if it will inhibit gains by blocking the androgen receptor as the elitefitness add for ag-guys claims? im thinking it justs a way to put the af-store down, but I'm just not sure, any answers are greatly appreciated

 

[mr. snakes]

So whats the deal with the Elitefitness e-mail saying that AIFM gets a D, Does it really block the Androgen recepter and inhibit gains as much as they claim?

AIFM ????

 

[macrophage69alpha]

no it does not block the androgen receptor (unless you are a castrated monkey) in which case aromasin would do the same thing.

in the absence of other androgens it can bind to the AR (as can aromasin)--- with an affinity rated at .2% that of dht (basically if there are any androgens present at all- not an issue)

 

[Ulter]

It's utter horseshit.
What email are you talking about?

 

[macrophage69alpha]

its that ag report card, the one that says that arimidex is awesome and that aromasin is OK.

no scientific nor experiential basis for any of the claims made in the "article".

 

[UA_Iron]

you guys should send me a sample of this AIFM.... further testing is needed

 

[Ulter]

Oh ok. Thanks

In that case to answer your question Chestmasterl that "email" is garbage. It's just an opinion by someone with no qualifications or scientific data to make such claims.
It's too bad that someone as respectable as George put his name on the "email" even though he isn't really responsible for the content.

And BTW it doesn't say anything about AIFM. It talks about orally dosed ATD. Which is very weak.

AIFM has been reformulated to be much less allergenic. So I don't think allergies will be an issue anymore.

 

[chestmaster1]

no it does not block the androgen receptor (unless you are a castrated monkey) in which case aromasin would do the same thing.

in the absence of other androgens it can bind to the AR (as can aromasin)--- with an affinity rated at .2% that of dht (basically if there are any androgens present at all- not an issue)

ohh ok thanks for the info, I wasn't sure because they led on like it was the only one of the 4 that did that by posting a source of literature

thanks Ulter I knew it sounded strange that it would receive a D and everybody seems like there using it

 

[macrophage69alpha]

its an unfortunate error in judgement in making such baseless assertions to scare people away from an effective Aromatase inhibitor.

with respect to the allergy issue, it is present with all aromatase inhibitors, oral or topical.

 

[kbrkbr]

Sometimes I think there's a smear campaign against the AF store.