jubei said:Waste of time, stick with tren acetate.
jubei said:Sure, here is my reasoning, I'll try not to make corn LOL again.
3. You will need to inject 3ml eod with tren enth to = 1ml ed with tren acetate, nullifying the benifit of attaching an enanthate ester in the first place for all practical purposes.
jubei said:Sure, here is my reasoning, I'll try not to make corn LOL again.
3. You will need to inject 3ml eod with tren enth to = 1ml ed with tren acetate, nullifying the benifit of attaching an enanthate ester in the first place for all practical purposes.
jubei said:There are a couple reasons people don't take test prop instead of enth.
1. Test prop comes in 100mg/ml (except in a few cases) and is very painful.
2. Test enth is cheaper mg/mg and readily available.
3. Test enth usually comes in 200/250mg/ml so taking 2-4ml/week is fine.
There is nothing WRONG with test enth, however there is also nothing great about it either. If you want a weaker, slower acting version of tren acetate than by all means go out and get some. For everyone else...don't waste your time.
I don't give a rats ass what you feel or think. Test prop is stronger mg/mg than test enth (in terms of free test) and is faster acting. If you have any sort of evidence to refute this please post it, and failing that shut your mouth.
Sorry never heard of or seen the product to which you are referring and it sounds like bullshit. 200mg of tren and 100mg of test per ml? Also why would anyone use test cyp with tren enth? Why not use test enth? My calculations for 11ml were based on 75mg/ml and were in comparision to 1ml of tren acetate ed. Just like others who claim test is test, tren is tren. Stick an enanthate ester on it if you think it is going to magically enhance its anabolic properties.
jubei said:Dancer,where is your proof to back up your claim about test prop not being stronger or faster acting than test enth?
dancer said:
Judge for yourself how much waist of a time it was, my cycle pics and results:
http://anabolicfitness.infopop.net/2/OpenTopic?a=tpc&s=702093973&f=312093973&m=4513081827
Dancer,where is your proof to back up your claim about test prop not being stronger or faster acting than test enth? Obviously I don't care about the baseless opinion of some fag tag pole dancer.
Andy13
AF Member
posted 05-11-2002 04:49 PM
You are correct in that a testosterone ester, injected IM, is stored and released slowly. Can we all agree that when an AAS in injected IM, it slowly is released into the blood where it is de-esterified to an active androgen? Ok--
And since you are a mechanical engineer, you should recognize the fact that the rate of diffusion of the AAS from the site of injection is exponentially related to the size of the depot. And as the size of the depot decreases, so does the rate of diffusion from the site of injection.
The equation for amount of esterified testosterone remaining after x (day, hours) is k*e^(ln(1/2)*x/h), where k= amount injected, x=day/hour you are interested in and h=half life (x and h units must be consistant).
If you are interested in the derivation of this equation, check out your Diff equ book.
The amount of ACTIVE or, released testosterone over one day/hour is simply the difference between two x values.
But, besides all the math stuff.. This one's actually pretty logical.. Testosterone is released the FASTEST from the site of injection when the size of the injection is largest.. And, when the size of the injection is largest is..... Immediately after the injection! Does this make any sence? Sustanon's esters DO NOT release one by one.. They ALL release at the same time, albeit some slower than others. The prop esters rate of release is faster then the deconate ester.. But, regardless, the PEAK blood testosterone from any single injection of sustanon is seen about 24hrs after it is injected. I've done this math/graphs ad naseum. I've also seen actual blood test graphs-- the theoretical graphs (from the equation I gave) is remarkably similar to the the actual blood tests.. So much that we may plot these mathematical graphs and assume they are, for our purposes, accurate.
Contrary to belief, the graph of a single shot of sustanon does not look like a pyrymid, suggesting that the PEAK blood levels are seen some 3-4-5-6 days after the initial injection.
Actually, the graph looks much like a ski sloap.. It has a SHARP up spike and then gradually sloaps down from there..
Do the math- you will see. I wish I could figure out how to plot these graphs on this board.
Andy
I really wanted to stay out of this because I have my own history with dancer, but bro, don't be posting your pics as proof to the products working or not because frankly, anyone could get the gains you got without gear by simply adjusting diet and working out. For someone taking over a gram of test/week, with over 100mg tren/day, 20mg halo/day, not to mention masteron for two months I would expect much more shape, hardness and size. For having supposedly over two years of cycle experience under his belt I would not be proud.
dancer said:
actually bro 300 mgs of test cyp is less than a gram, only during the first 2 weeks I ran a gram but never "over".
dancer said:
I would like to elaborate on my past cycles. I have gone as high as 3 grams of aas a week in the past.
Corleone said:
Guess I didn't read far enough down your graph. Well then by all means you got great gains.When are you gonna go pro?
I've seen you in the past and you looked like shit then.
Man, I don't know why you choose to start a war whenever anyone questions a s**** product but you need to quit this shit, it's not good. I know you believe in the company but you don't need to shove it down our throats.
And I'll say it so others don't have to: not only do you look bad for someone who juices, you look bad for someone who works out.
Man I don't know why I waste my time, I knew I should have stayed out of this post. I'll let others tear you to shreds, I'm out of this one.
Corleone said:You're really making yourself look like an ass. You have no room to talk about my build. You look like a pudgy piece of shit. You're nothing but a wannabe fag lap dancer.
Yea so I planned a 5 month cycle, so what's your point? My bloodwork came back fine last month, what are you trying to prove? I see nothing wrong with staying on for 5 months when I've been off the last 7 months. I know my body a lot better than someone like you who doesn't even know their own.
It doesn't really matter what you think. Your AAS knowledge is laughable and obviously you don't know how to workout or you'd look like someone who works out. To me you look like the average wannabe who works out once a week. You're a putz.
This is pointless. . .I love message board shit talkers.

jubei said:Little bitch? Damn shorty sounds like you have little man syndrome? I only want to be 210-215 lbs. max but I'll still be 6 percent bf then. Who the hell wants to weigh 280?
dancer said:
I have had and will have more ass that you will ever
Corleone said:Legs and peck? WTF is that?
Corleone said:What's a hocker? Someone who spits on you?
jubei said:What kind of a dancer has 14 percent bodyfat? Well you know you have over 30lbs. of fat on your 5'7'' frame. I have about 10lbs. of fat on my 190 @ 5'11''. Let me know when you hit 6 percent.
jubei said:Wow you a really sad. I'm sure you are the toughest and baddest dancer around.
You were unable to make your point about enth being stronger than prop, instead opting to post an article re: sustanon vs. single ester compounds and now are just running your mouth. I'm sure you get alot of ass but that doesn't make you straight.
I'm done posting on this thread unless somebody wants to bring some information to the table about tren enth. vs. tren acetate.
If they were priced the same and tren enth was in a higher dosage (150mg+) it would be worth looking into. However @ 75mg/ml tren enth is and will remain a waste of time (as an alternative to tren acetate due to volumous injections.
poantrex said:
Dude, 14% bodyfat is not bad at all - there are VERY few people that can achieve 6% bodyfat...hell, most pros can't even hit that mark.
dancer said:
yes it is these guys bulk up 20-25 pounds and stay at 6%... its a myth pros aren't 3-4% at comp they are -10% and they take notes from Jubei and Corleone.
I agree @ 10-14 I can see ABS. More over 5'10" at 190 is pitiful; staying on for 5 months and and talking shit to a guy that gained more proportionally in 8 weeks is even more pitiful.poantrex said:
To that I respond, I doubt you know what 6% bodyfat looks like. I can't tell you how many times i've seen people under-estimate their bodyfat prior to having it tested - you can usually see abs at 10-14% bodyfat.
\bigmouth said:has this product came out yet and if so has anyone tried it
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 










