so i was curious as to how someone would build a pct for a tren only cycle with everything needed. assuming i can get it all
I am interested in this two and I have some questions.
1.I know one major reason for using test is for E.D. Could this be corrected with Viagra? Would the E.D go away after the cycle once natural levels of test are back?
2. Another reason why people say to do test is for the gains and because a estrogen steroid is needed.If this is the case, why does everyone block the estrogen when doing cycles with test via nolva or adex? I know the reason because of symptoms, but then why is a compound that aromatises needed?
3.Is it true that estrogen is needed for progesterone gyno? If so why does Nolva and an AI not work for estrogen and progesterone gyno?
4. Even if you disagree with a tren only cycle, how would you run PCT with it? How much bromo? During? Nolva for after the cycle?
5. If one was to run tren and test at the same time, would the gains be the same if they ran tren, and then test?
6. Are Anthony Roberts amd Bill roberts still proponents of the short 2 week cycles? I wanted to try this with tren only. For the people who have tried this, do you have any suggestions? I am especially curious about PCT + tren +short cycle. I of course would use tren acetate and would not expect freakish gains, but decent gains with say 2 weeks on, and 3 weeks off.
Thanks for your help input !
I am interested in this two and I have some questions.
1.I know one major reason for using test is for E.D. Could this be corrected with Viagra? Would the E.D go away after the cycle once natural levels of test are back?
Can you be more specific on this? Test & Viagra are 2 different drugs used for different things...
2. Another reason why people say to do test is for the gains and because a estrogen steroid is needed.If this is the case, why does everyone block the estrogen when doing cycles with test via nolva or adex? I know the reason because of symptoms, but then why is a compound that aromatises needed?
"Estrogen Steriod?" What is this? Adex is usually kept in the bullpen just in case, everyone reacts differently to different compounds & the smart ones keep certain things on hand as a worst case thing....the issues with nolva are that times have changed and science has advanced passed noooooooolva...
3.Is it true that estrogen is needed for progesterone gyno? If so why does Nolva and an AI not work for estrogen and progesterone gyno?
4. Even if you disagree with a tren only cycle, how would you run PCT with it? How much bromo? During? Nolva for after the cycle?
Hard to answer, just not a smart move
5. If one was to run tren and test at the same time, would the gains be the same if they ran tren, and then test?
Impossible to answer, just becase you put more and more AAS into your body you're not guarenteed "better" results, it all depends on the person
6. Are Anthony Roberts amd Bill roberts still proponents of the short 2 week cycles? I wanted to try this with tren only. For the people who have tried this, do you have any suggestions? I am especially curious about PCT + tren +short cycle. I of course would use tren acetate and would not expect freakish gains, but decent gains with say 2 weeks on, and 3 weeks off.
Short cycles can be great, easier to recover from and yes you'd wanna use the short esters...Are you suggesting going 2 weeks on 3 weeks off & repeating year round? I feel like 5 weeks would be the shortest you could go, you could still see nice gains and in theory run more cycles per year....butagain; more isn't always better and tren only just isn't a good idea...
Thanks for your help input !
I think I didn't phrase some questions right.I know why nolva would not be ran as an AI. It stops estrogen from binding, does not stop the conversion.To stop the conversion adex or letro would be needed, I know with tren-A, estrogen should not be the enemy, progesterone is. Progesterone can be blocked with Bromo? Ok,...so that means if I didn't use bromo, and I did use a No-No like Nolva, progesterone side effects could still form because the body would still have estrogen (even if it is blocked) to form the progesterone? But if I use letro (.25-.5) it would lower my estrogen next to zero which would stop progesterone from forming? Thus making progesterone gyno nearly impossible to get? BUT, then I would be using letro, and tren, which would both give me ED problems?
I thought if I ran short cycles, my body would recover much faster but I would gain less immediately but would lose less of my gains, and this would be the trade off. I'll be getting testerone levels checked before I do anything.I'll be pinning everyday to keep blood levels in check.
Do you think doing short cycles is harder on the body than doing a long one because I would be doing more ON, and Offs regularly?
EZ,
So no Nolva for PCT, or during cycle.Ok, I will stay away from that then with Tren.
Viagra would be used for limp Dic* as I have heard that tren can make one go limp without testosterone? Would Viagra not help without test?
Should I only take a progesterone blocker if I see sides coming on? Just as a safety precaution instead of preventative?
Your experience tells you that 5 weeks gives you good gains and fast recovery, but anything less does not give you good enough gains?
I will take that into consideration.
The reason why I was thinking 2 weeks is because Anthony Roberts mentioned that anything more than 2 weeks suppresses your recovery system to a point that more than 2 weeks on the suppression would be no different than a longer cycle recovery therefore eliminating the benefit of the short cycle. But in your opnion, 5 weeks on, recover is still fast recovery EZ?
EZ,
So no Nolva for PCT, or during cycle.Ok, I will stay away from that then with Tren.
Viagra would be used for limp Dic* as I have heard that tren can make one go limp without testosterone? Would Viagra not help without test?
You're making it way too complicated, Just don't run tren alone.
Should I only take a progesterone blocker if I see sides coming on? Just as a safety precaution instead of preventative?
Generally yes, are you prone? Do you have a cycle history? I'm a believer in less is more and not using the whole kitche sink unless necessary...
Your experience tells you that 5 weeks gives you good gains and fast recovery, but anything less does not give you good enough gains?
No, that was just a suggestion. I've heard of guys doing 3 week cycles...if I was going to do a short one I'd probably go with a mimimum of 5 weeks..but to bumo the point made earleir that doesn't mean someone should do 5 on, 10 off year round....
I will take that into consideration.
The reason why I was thinking 2 weeks is because Anthony Roberts mentioned that anything more than 2 weeks suppresses your recovery system to a point that more than 2 weeks on the suppression would be no different than a longer cycle recovery therefore eliminating the benefit of the short cycle. But in your opnion, 5 weeks on, recover is still fast recovery EZ?
It's a fine line, a short cycle can give you nice gains and easy recovery, but you have to be very specific with what you run....the new school methods of on cycle support and PCT make it easier to be able to run a bit longer cycle, recover better, and keep gains
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














