Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Thinking about hiring a personal trainer

AmmunitionVx

New member
I need somebody ( in person ) to help me get fit, my form seems to be off ( hurt my shoulder yestarday during bench pressing ), I also suffer from a shitty diet..


So, I was wondering how many people here have personal trainers or have had them before? and if you had a good trainer , did you tend to make better gains working with that trainer vs by yourself?


I don't want to sound lazy and not do research on my own, but i think i need help being pushed to my limits and some and a layed out diet plan..


also, when looking for a personal trainer ( at my gym ) what should I look for?
 
First of all, assuming you can afford it, go with a real certified traininer, not some gym employee. Trainers are great to help get you started. If you're new to lifting and have the time and money to learn that way, I'd say go with one for a couple weeks and learn the basics, but no more. The rest will be up to you. A good trainer is great to learn your shit from, but the last thing you want to do is become dependent on one for motivation.
 
look for solid certifications (reputable nationally recognized ones). a degree would be even better (though dont hold me to that, ive seen my share of trainers with degrees....nevermind). (hehe) hit the search on here for good certifications, tons of threads on the subject.

your mealplan should be well rounded, and not a from the hip type of plan. ex. "oh...try to eat about 1 g per pound of bodyweight of protein and fill the rest in with carbs and fats." you should have a calorie goal to shoot for based on your body composition.

ensure that when you learn an exercise you know what it is working, and how to change it up for variety/plateau busting.

if you can do it, start out strong with a trainer, then taper off (wean yourself and make yourself accountable for the proper intensity and your food intake) make sure before you wean yourself though, that you can take a particular exercise and you know what to look for as far as bad form. if you just know how to do it, but dont know what NOT to do...you wont be as effective alone. have the trainer give you workouts to do on the days you arent with him/her. this will get you looking at your own form instead of relying on the trainer to constantly correct you.

im a trainer, so i know basically what i want to try to get across to my clients if they buy 2 sessions or 200, i still want them to be effective and use good form, since its my name they are saying when someone asks who taught them.

hope that helps.
 
even tho I haven't seen this trainer yet, I'm thinking about going with this person( at my gym )


Area of Expertise
Training the Elite Athlete; Sport specific training; Post-rehab
Cetification(s)
Certified Rehab Specialist; C.C.S. - Certified Conditioning Specialist for N.S.P.A
Additional Experience
Speaker & Evaluator for the N.S.P.A

Accomplishments
Fitness Director of the Year - 1999; Three time All Conference Collegiate Football Player

Philosophy
The more balanced you are mentally, physically and spiritually, the more sound you will become!

School Attended Degree
Towson State University B.S. in Sports Management



I still haven't made a descison yet, but from viewing this alone, do you think he would be a good trainer?
 
Looks like a complete hack to me. :)

j/k....very impressive credentials, imo. bignate will know more about them though.
 
Make sure your trainer is geared toward your goals. If you hurt your shoulder benching, it's probably because you're benching like a body builder. If you stop using your chest and shoulders to bench, and start using your lats and tris more, you won't f*** your shoulder. A trainer, certified or not, may not know proper form. If you want to learn how to bench correctly, find a strength and conditioning coach that used to be, or is, a power lifter. If you want to build big pecs without f***ing up your shoudlers, do flies.
 
not everyone is predisposed to shoulder injury because they bench out wide. just because someone teaches it that way doesnt mean they are "ignorant" to how powerlifters train either. there are many strength and conditioning coaches that teach a "pec" bench because it trains the prime movers of that exercise....the chest and shoulders. if you think that the triceps and the lats (hehe) are involved in a 500 lb bench as the prime movers, i dont know what to tell you. i know the whole "back release" principle, whatever its supposed to be, but the lats prime motions are not the direction that one presses. unless you can reverse contract. the shoulder may be put out of less precarious position but to attribute a pressing movement to a pulling muscle is like saying "my biceps hurt doing dips".

i dont care who puts what numbers up and swears by thier lats being a prime mover. muscle action will tell you whats really going on. i've had this debate before.
 
bignate73 said:
if you think that the triceps and the lats (hehe) are involved in a 500 lb bench as the prime movers, i dont know what to tell you. i know the whole "back release" principle, whatever its supposed to be, but the lats prime motions are not the direction that one presses. unless you can reverse contract. the shoulder may be put out of less precarious position but to attribute a pressing movement to a pulling muscle is like saying "my biceps hurt doing dips".

i dont care who puts what numbers up and swears by thier lats being a prime mover. muscle action will tell you whats really going on. i've had this debate before.

Well we won't debate the lats involvement because you seem to have closed your mind to that. But if you don't think that TRICEPS are the #1 "mover" in the bench press..then I don't know what to tell you.

People post big numbers...and when their lat strength increases their bench goes up, but you don't care? As a trainer that doesn't make sense to me. Even though I train one way...I am always open to new ways of doing things. Next year at the Arnold Classic...I will look for the guys with the big triceps and thick back...they are the ones that will put up some serious weight.

It is true that not everyone is predisposed to shoulder issues...many people develop them as a direct results of "benching wide" as you call it. Just look at the amount of shoulder rotation that is involved when you bench with your elbows at 90 deg....as compared to when you bench with your elbows tucked. Why subject your shoulder joint to the extra rotation if it isn't necessary??
 
Last edited:
Look for someone who has done it!!!! Just because someone has a degree or a certificate...it doesn't mean that they know squat about getting big, lean, strength, etc...

If I want to learn how to get huge, I don't ask someone who is 180lbs. If I want a huge squat, I don't ask someone who can squat 405. If I want to learn how to do the atlas stones perfectly, I don't ask someone who can barely do a 300lb atlas stone.

Just burns my tail that everyone thinks that because they can "scientifically" back something up about training that it is true. Lots of things are true in theory ONLY. Find me a guy who has done it...actually done it...then take their advice.

B True
 
To learn a thing or two:
http://boards.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=137230

500 is not a "big bench."

I have no doubt that there are BB trainers out there that know PL form...I'm one of them. This thread is about someone who said, "I need somebody ( in person ) to help me get fit, my form seems to be off ( hurt my shoulder yestarday during bench pressing )." So he is predisposed, and if he is benching at 90%, he will find the rotation to cause persistant discomfort.

I was suggesting ways he can increase hypertrophy of the pecs without further irritating his shoulder, and that is to do movements that involve shoulder rotation less and chest stimulation more. Benching at 90 degrees is not one of those movements.

The lats, shoulders and tris are prime movers of the PLers bench, and shoulder rotation is decreased. I have no doubt that the way you bench involves chest and shoulders with undue shoulder rotation. I think that Vx would be ill advised to bench your way given the symptoms he presents.
 
Last edited:
Spatterson, but WestSide Training isn't the be all and and end all of training in all its forms.

Don't tell a bodybuilder to bench like a powerlifter. Powerlifter bench in certain ways to artificially increase their poundages.

You're telling him to do flies?? WTF?

I'm with bignate on this one.

-Zulu
 
I'm not trying to tell him to train like a PLer. I'm telling him that movements with shoulder rotation like the 90 degree bench will do more harm then good if it's already irritating him.

Yes, seated flys are an example of a movement that limits shoulder rotation and stimulates the pecs. I don't know his goals...size, strength, etc. I just know that if his shoulder is causing him problems benching like that, and he wants to increase his bench, he needs to change his bench form.

I'm not a WSB preacher. I do my homework. You said that, not me. WSB invovles so much more than this...chains, bands, ME, speed, ME rotations, etc. This is bench pressing. This topic doesn't scratch the surface of WSB, and frankly I don't see how your comment applies. Ed Coan, Kaz, etc...none of them WSB guys. ALL of them contend that lats and tris moved their bench.

http://boards.elitefitness.com/forum/showthread.php?threadid=137230

Bignate, I spent my fair share of time in med school, so you don't have to talk down to me. Feel free to use big words and present references for your studies. I'm always up for an intelligent debate. However, I don't think there is one here, as I'm not contradicting you.
 
Last edited:
Don't tell a bodybuilder to bench like a powerlifter. Powerlifter bench in certain ways to artificially increase their poundages.

You need to rethink your choice of words, ZZuluZ. There is nothing artificial about a powerlifter's benching form and the numbers it produces. The PL technique for benching is tried and true and in no way is it a gimmick. I think a more appropriate use of the word artificial when it pertains to lifting is the use of equipment and/or gear.

The triceps are the prime mover in the bench press. Triceps are the most important. A strong upper back and lats are also extremely important in benching effectively. The chest is rarely the weak link in the pressing motion. If you want to protect the shoulders while benching then use the PL technique. Rotation is minimized and a lot of the weight is transfered to the more powerful back muscles.
 
"
You need to rethink your choice of words, ZZuluZ. There is nothing artificial about a powerlifter's benching form and the numbers it produces. The PL technique for benching is tried and true and in no way is it a gimmick. I think a more appropriate use of the word artificial when it pertains to lifting is the use of equipment and/or gear. "

I stick to my choice of words. Often these are artificial ways of increasing poundages.

" Yes, seated flys are an example of a movement that limits shoulder rotation and stimulates the pecs. I don't know his goals...size, strength, etc."

Seated flys? Urgh.

There's no need to quote WS here.....I've read it all and I'm a fan of it. It doesn't apply to the bodybuilder.

Powerlifting techniques will increase your bench but they are not optimal for pec development. Neither are flies.

Dips and Push-ups are FAR better alternatives.

-Zulu
 
ditto to b fold the truth....look for someone who practices what they preach. not the guy who's knees are the widest part of his legs, and tells you squats and dead lifts are bad !
 
ZZuluZ said:

I stick to my choice of words. Often these are artificial ways of increasing poundages.

Not to be difficult here, but if a powerlifter moves the weight, how can it be considered "artificial"? Because it's not done in the same fashion as a bodybuilder?
 
Seated "F L I E S" are just one example of a BB type pec movement that doesn't rotate the shoulder too much. They target the tie in fairly well, and the entire pec when performed on a negative plane with proper form. There are SEVERAL movements that fall into this category, the ones you mention NOT included.

WHO IS QUOTING WESTSIDE!?!?!??!?!?!?!?!?!

I stick to my choice of words. Often these are artificial ways of increasing poundages.

Why is this plural? We are talking one movement and one means...what are "these...ways?"

Why don't you do a little search on where/when the bench press originated, and what form was used to get maximum weight up...then you come tell me whose form is an artifical modification.
 
Last edited:
ZZuluZ said:
[BI stick to my choice of words. Often these are artificial ways of increasing poundages.
[/B]

IF...you are talkin about a bench shirt. There is a "ever so slight" bit of truth. But don't think that the shirt does it for you. AND if it is so easy to artificially move big weight with equipment. Call Inzer....and we'll see you at the next Bench Competition.
 
if someone can honestly explain to me the involvement of the lats in a pressing movement beyond stabilization and slight internal rotation of the humerus...i would greatly appreciate it.

as for the guy whose done it. great for him. he can tell you this or that. my area of study is exercise SCIENCE, so that means...i want to know HOW. SPECIFICALLY.

i might, just might understand the muscle actions, their effect eccentrically, concentrically, and isometrically, so if someone can shed some light on the subject how the lats work for an concentric pressing motion, when their concentric action is shoulder extension, internal rotation of the humerus etc. isnt the PL'ers bench shoulder flexion??? coming from a more tucked elbow position to the sides.

now i can understand contracting the lats...to arch the back and thereby shorten the distance to the chest, also essentially putting the body in a decline position despite being on a flat bench. i understand all of this...but as for a muscle reversing its action, thats like saying that a hydraulic piston suddenly loses all its pressure and goes into a vacuum. if you follow the sliding filament theory.

im not being belittling or talking down to someone but honestly there is no logic to the whole "back release" belief.
 
bignate73 said:
as for the guy whose done it. great for him. he can tell you this or that. my area of study is exercise SCIENCE, so that means...i want to know HOW. SPECIFICALLY.

So your study of exercise SCIENCE has gotten you where? You have posted a big bench press...right? You not using your lats has given you a huge bench press...right? It has given you a huge chest also...right?

I am sorry...but untill you have done it...it is all theory. I may be a dumb athlete...but I am a dumb atlhete who has went from nothing to something. I am also a dumb athlete who can put up decent numbers on the squat, bench, and deadlift...AND still look decent for a strength athlete.

Your area of study in exercise SCIENCE has given you that also...right?

B True
 
im gonna be open minded, tomorrow, im going to give it a shot.

i understand the form, but im going to figure out HOW. i can actually see a little of how scapular depression can cause the shoulder which is hyperextended at the bottom of the bench can cause for a small amount of shoulder and humerus movement. a strong enough contraction that way COULD start the motion off the chest, but from there thats a shitload of close grip tricep pressing and some serious front delts.

like i said, i'll give it a shot so i can understand it. who knows, i may implement it into my training. (not now though, im 2 weeks out from a show and the joints cant take too much in the way of big stress) no fat=no cushion.
 
bignate73 said:
as for the guy whose done it. great for him. he can tell you this or that. my area of study is exercise SCIENCE, so that means...i want to know HOW. SPECIFICALLY.

now i can understand contracting the lats...to arch the back and thereby shorten the distance to the chest, also essentially putting the body in a decline position despite being on a flat bench. i understand all of this...but as for a muscle reversing its action, thats like saying that a hydraulic piston suddenly loses all its pressure and goes into a vacuum. if you follow the sliding filament theory.

http://www.testosterone.net/articles/180press.html

Ok....if you know the whole "back release theory" as you call it...then you realize that by using it, it will produce a force driving into the bar. And it may only be a few inches...no arguing that. But when you are a top bencher...and your bench stroke is only 7" or 8"...then that "couple of inches" is a big thing. And after that...guess what...the triceps lock out the bar. I am not arguing that chest and shoulders aren't involved in benching...they are...but lats and especially triceps are involved to a greater extent.

You can use Science to prove almost anything on paper. But in the "trenches" things are different. Yes it is somewhat important to have a basic understanding of WHY something is the way it is. How else do you explain to your clients why they should do something...I can understand and respect that. But if I increase my lats strength, and dont change anything else about my training...and my bench goes up...there is a direct correlation that I dont have to look in a text book to find.

On a side note....Westside has been using the bands for active recovery work for years...and they still don't know exactly WHY or HOW they work...they just see the results. I don't know why they work either...and while I would like to know...as long as I see progress from using them...the end justifies the means.
 
Last edited:
bfold im not here to get into a pissing contest with your accomplishments. they are great and are duly noted. my interest is in the HOW, scientifically. im assuming someone can explain it to me.

as for my accomplishments, i dont brag. i know where im at now, i know what i'll win in 2 weeks, and i know what my knowledge of nutrition (sound nutrition that is) and solid training can do to my body.

you take it personally because its your sport, fine but you shouldnt. just because i question it and ask for it to be explained in real scientific terms shouldnt be taken as an attack. if it "just happens" then there is a reason how, thats all im asking. if you cant explain it, someone else can. but there is no way i'll be satisfied with..."so and so said its good, or it must be true because..." sorry, thats not how i work.

if you insist on questioning my experience, what i have accomplished etc. because of my scientific background (and i have seen your disdain for science/theory) i'll post pics of whatever will satisfy someone as to my bodybuilding and training integrity.
 
Why are we getting sidetracked by the lats? I specifically said tris, lats, and shoulders. You aren't the only one around here sporting an ACSM, so I don't need to remind you that there isn't enough physics on that exam.

Keep in mind that "scientific studies" like Barnet, 1995, regarding IGF recruitment are not going to be applicable in terms of lat/tri use as the subjects tested were not engaging those muscles...they were benching "like body builders."

Bfold has a point...I'm a 170 pounds female, and I'm benching about 200. Clean (natural) and raw (no lifting gear). I'm also recovering from shoulder injuries from benching at 90 degrees. My goal is 315 by December. I never train my chest.

Shoulder injuries are the NUMBER ONE reason to learn how to engage your lats and use your traps. For starters, the lats hold the bar in the "groove" to ensure proper bar placement. For me that's sternum, not chest. It may land too high or too low. If it is too low, the delts are involved too much. If the bar lands too high, the triceps are involved too much. Strong lats will ensure the bar is placed in the correct position, that is, with the forearms vertical. In this position, an equal amount of delt, pec, and triceps are used in pressing. If you don’t place the bar in the correct position, delt and pec injuries are more likely to occur. The path of the bar in the concentric phase should be a straight line. This requires the correct use of muscles. When the Clemson University coaching staff wanted to know which are the most important muscle groups for benching, George Halbert told them triceps are first, lats second, upper back third, and delts last. George holds the world record in the 220’s at 657, a world record of 688 in the 242s and a 683 at 227, the heaviest triple bodyweight bench of all time (457 pounds over bodyweight).

In case you want a non-Louie opinion...

ASSISTANCE MOVEMENTS FOR THE BENCH PRESS
By David Geistlinger, Nebraska USAPL Athlete Rep

There is no doubt about it. If you want to increase the amount of weight you can handle on the bench, you need to spend a substantial amount of time doing the bench press, or a variation of the bench movement. But if you want to reach your maximum potential and stay injury free, you must also do assistance exercises for the muscles utilized while bench pressing.

Often times, a lifter will have a dominantly strong prime mover. Your prime movers in the bench press are the lats, pecs, front delts, and the triceps. Many times the lifter will rely on their dominantly strong muscles to overcome for their weak points. This usually results in bad form. One example would be when the bar drifts back over the face in an arched pathway. People bench with an arched bar pathway because they have weak lats and triceps. They overcompensate by putting extra load on the front delts. They can do all the sets of the bench press exercise that they can, but their form will never improve. They will continue to let the bar drift back over the face. The more sets that they let this happen, the worse their muscle imbalance becomes, because more time is spent using the delts, and less time is used stressing the triceps and lats. This means that if we want to improve form, we need to do so by strengthening the muscles utilized in the bench press in the right proportions. As time goes by, the amount of assistance that we do for a particular muscle will change. Over time, muscles that were a weak point may become a strong point and vice versa. The amount of assistance for each muscle needs to be adjusted on a constant basis so that the weaker muscles are getting the majority of time spent doing extra exercises.

_______

Recruitment is just as important as strength, IMO. Very few lifters utilize the strength of the lats in their bench press and when they are able to incorporate lat contraction into their exercises, immediate increase is always achieved. Here is how you incorporate the lats into your bench press: Take an empty bar or even a wooden rod and assume the bench press position. Lower the bar to the chest and pause. Instead of driving the weight up with the arms, contract or “flare” the lats in an outward direction. If you have decent lat development, you should see the bar move several inches off the chest. This takes practice to utilize the lats in this manner, but be persistent and practice over and over with an empty bar, gradually adding weight as you get used to the movement. The eventual goal is to use the lats as sort of a cushion or coiled spring when lowering the bar and then contracting them strongly on the initial drive at the same time you are pressing with the arms. Athletes who have increased their maximum bench press anywhere from 20-50lbs within 2 weeks as a result of using this technique.

In addition to recruitment is conditioning. Muscles can be stronger in one plane than another. For this reason, lats should be trained in the same plane as the bench, ie bb rows.

Perhaps you'd like to take a stab at how power lifters are able to press more than 500 pounds with torn pecs?

I read your posts regularly, and I know you know your stuff. I've been on both sides of this. 16 weeks ago I was benching 95 pounds...I started benching with my lats/tris/shoulders, and have added over 100 pounds, and my shoudler is finally rehabbing successfully. Give it an honest try before you knock it. However, be warned that benching like this won't train your chest to failure, so you have to use other movements to do this, such as db flies (yes, I said it again), db presses and bb presses all at less than 30 degrees (to not engage anterior delts). If you have a "good" shoulder, then do all that dipping stuff if you want. I wouldn't recommend those movements for someone with weak, or otherwise compromised, shoulders. :)
 
Last edited:
So when you posted earlier in this thread that the lats were NOT part of the prime movers of the bench press...you stated that because you were searching for the right answer...or just because...hmm..how did you just put it..."so and so said its good, or it must be true because..."

Well...you are saying that "pec" benching is good and that you don't have to use your lats for a big bench. Where did you get this from? Or did you just hear it from so and so...?

If the guys from WSB or Coan, Frank, etc...tells me to use my lats, heels, triceps, tongue, pecker...whatever...I will listen because they have done it. There is only one way to prove it...that is to step up to the platform or stage and do it.

B True
 
spatterson said:
Why are we getting sidetracked by the lats? I specifically said tris, lats, and shoulder. You aren't the only one around here sportin and ACSM, so I don't need to remind you that there isn't enough physics on that exam.


that explained how (kindof) the lats are involved. more of a synergistic effect, which goes against pec benching. i can relate.

all i wanted was an explanation of lat involvement by those doing it. i hear anecdotal this and that, i just wanted some explanation.

i know people get up in arms when someone questions thier way of doing business. its not a "you guys are all fucked up thread", its a tell me how inquiry.

ps....look again. its NASM, i dont have ACSM (yet). :)
 
I don't understand everything about how it works...and I don't believe that everything about the Westside methods work for me either. I pick and choose from different programs through trial and error and I try to keep my errors down to as little as possible.

B True
 
My way vs your way is irrelevant, we have different goals.

However, my concern for the point of this thread is its originator and his shoulder problem. If he goes out and finds any old trainer, educated and certified or not, and that person is as firm in his benching form beliefs as you were/are he may damage his shoulder further. If you need to bench such that your pecs are more stimulated for purposes of hypertrophy and symmetry, then you are doing a movement that's ideal for your goals.

BUT...

If you are operating with a bum shoulder (or potentially bum shoulder), skip or modify your bench form and work on strengthening the upper back and shoulder. Go back to the wide bench later when the shoulder is strong enough to support it.

AND...

If your goal is strength and a big bench (powerlifting), you will need to bench with the tris/lats/shoulders and not out wide.

Thanks for the civilized debate. :)
 
b fold the truth said:
I don't understand everything about how it works...and I don't believe that everything about the Westside methods work for me either. I pick and choose from different programs through trial and error and I try to keep my errors down to as little as possible.

B True

so be it. thats my point of asking why. to minimize wasted time in the gym, to make progress.

since i am looked upon as an instructor (and since trainers seem to have such a bad reputation) then i had damn well be able to explain the how and why of an exercise. otherwise im that guy who perpetuates the "do it cause i said so" belief that is thought of for some trainers. im not taken seriously unless i can explain something thoroughly. if i take a little heat for asking questions oh well, it wont affect my paycheck. but if i misinform someone it will.
 
I can appreciate that, bignate, I am a "why" person too. I have been a track athlete, a body builder, and most recently a power lifter. Some of the physics equations I put into my training...like diagraming the leg drive for bench as its similarity to the force of a crow bar upward on an object from its fulcrum...I tend to overthink it. I like to get techinical with it, but when I'm finished at the drawing board, I like to test it. On myself, and then others. Like bfold said, some things only look good on paper.

The best teachers are the best learners.
 
Last edited:
spatterson said:
I like to get techinical with it, but when I'm finished at the drawing board, I like to test it. On myself, and then others. Like bfold said, some things only look good on paper.

The best teachers are the best learners.

The best way to learn something is to try to teach it....just have to have an open mind. Nothing at all wrong with being a "Why" person...thats a good thing...but no one should let "why this shouldn't work" get in the way of progress if you are making it. Book Smarts are invaluable...but Field Research is just as important if not more so.

Not directed at you Nate...but in general having a degree and a certificate is a great thing. But you should also have a degree in actually training. Along the lines of what B Fold said...A coach that can only bench 300 pounds will NEVER be able to teach me how to bench 600..he doesn't know.

That's why there as so few good coaches/trainers out there. They are EITHER book smart OR training smart....but rarely both.
 
Last edited:
Why is it that when I post something...Hannibal and Spatterson come along and say what I wanted to say...but in a much better manner? :)

Can I just post..."yeah...what Hannibal and Spatterson said" from now on...lol :)

B True
 
b fold the truth said:
Can I just post..."yeah...what Hannibal and Spatterson said" from now on...lol :)
B True

Well you could...but I warn you...I can be full of shit some times.

:lmao:
 
Hannibal said:


Well you could...but I warn you...I can be full of shit some times.

:lmao:

See...I was gonna say the same thing about you...

(sorry...couldn't resist...lol)

B True
 
It's disgraceful how some of you spit on science the way you do.

Why don't we all go fucking take your advice and listen to Arnold Shwarzenegger instead of Mel Siff. Arnold sure as hell was a lot bigger.

Give me a fucking a break.

While the pectorals are NOT often the weak link they are the main synergist in benchpressing.

" There are SEVERAL movements that fall into this category, the ones you mention NOT included. "

For god's sake, you're telling the guy to do flies. You expect him to get real big pecs this way?

-Zulu
 
Flies, db press/bb press at less than 30 degrees and rehab work for his shoulder/upper back until his shoulder is strong enough to support an elbows-out/chest stimulating bench.

What shoulder wrenching movements would YOU have him do?

I have given scientific reason for my suggestion. Give me your scientific justification for benching wide before his shoulder is strong enough to handle it. Are you trying to "thin the herd?" Do you want to see him hurt? He needs to strengthen his shoudler, and THEN go back to a wide bench when he can handle it.
 
I think he refers to this statement:

"If you want to build big pecs without f***ing up your shoudlers, do flies."

This does make it sound like you were advocating flies in order to make the original posters pecs grow.....rather than a temporary measure whilst his shoulder heals. However, it has to be said that you were alot more explicit in a later post and Zulu musta missed it.



spatterson said:
Flies, db press/bb press at less than 30 degrees and rehab work for his shoulder/upper back until his shoulder is strong enough to support an elbows-out/chest stimulating bench.

What shoulder wrenching movements would YOU have him do?

I have given scientific reason for my suggestion. Give me your scientific justification for benching wide before his shoulder is strong enough to handle it. Are you trying to "thin the herd?" Do you want to see him hurt? He needs to strengthen his shoudler, and THEN go back to a wide bench when he can handle it.
 
You're right. I should have been more specific about that being temporary. For someone with shoulder trouble, I contend that benching wide (or tucked in) is not the best way to develop the pecs. Not that flies are...it's just one example of something that doesn't generlly perpetuate shoulder issues, but targets the chest.
 
still practicing a PL style bench. tried it out this morning at work. feels awkward and low on my torso. not overly involving the front delts so i must be keeping the bar tracking pretty neutral. big arch in my back though to keep my shoulder blades pinched and to allow for the bar travel to upper abs.

i worked with 135 just to have some resistance but not heavy enough to get sloppy and overcompensate. i'll figure it out.
 
ZZuluZ said:
Why don't we all go fucking take your advice and listen to Arnold Shwarzenegger instead of Mel Siff. Arnold sure as hell was a lot bigger.

Uh...am I missing something here? I can't speak for anyone else, but where do you think most of WSB Techniques came from.....Siff's writings were a major influence. Yes Science is important...but so is actually training and seeing what works for you. Not many professors can bench there bodyweight.

Book Smarts are invaluable...but Field Research is just as important if not more so
 
If I had known that asking whether or not to hire a trainer would spark this kind of debate, I'd have done it months ago. This has been the best read on the Training board in many months.....it's good to see discussion on something other than "How do I peak my biceps?" now and then. Kudos to all participants.....even you btrue!!

For what it's worth, I'll throw in my .02 on the lat/tri/bench thing. I'm 34 yo, 6'1", 215-220, natural, lifting for eight years. Every lifter has muscle groups that grow and strengthen faster than others...mine are tris and lats. These particular muscle groups are proportionately larger and stronger than any other. I do unusually heavy excercises (for me anyway) for both these muscle groups. The thing is, I couldn't bench my way out of a paper bag. My max is about 275 bar, 100 db.

As for scientific knowledge vs experience. I look at it completely differently than most here. My knowledge is base primarily on my experience in the gym. So, I feel that makes me an expert on one thing only; that is what works for ME! If my time permitted, I would LOVE to have the scientific knowledge of a bignate or some of the other folks on this board. It's beyond me how some of you could think that kind of education is somehow detirmental.
 
It's one thing to have strong muscles, and yet another to RECRUIT them. My bench is only about 75 pounds lower than yours and I have WEAK tris/lats/shoulders.

I agree. Good thread. :)
 
spatterson said:
It's one thing to have strong muscles, and yet another to RECRUIT them. My bench is only about 75 pounds lower than yours and I have WEAK tris/lats/shoulders.

I agree. Good thread. :)

Well yeah, but someone back there said that to strengthen your back and tris will up your bench. Well, that hasn't been the case in my experience. Does that make the idea universally untrue? Hardly. There are too few absolutes in weight training.
 
bignate73 said:
still practicing a PL style bench. tried it out this morning at work. feels awkward and low on my torso. not overly involving the front delts so i must be keeping the bar tracking pretty neutral. big arch in my back though to keep my shoulder blades pinched and to allow for the bar travel to upper abs.

You don't really need a big arch to keep your shoulder blades together. Most of the BIG BENCHERS lie flat as a pancake. Leg Drive is more important that an arch. When you watch a true Bench Specialist like George [email protected] motion is a "controlled shove" transfering power from his entire body into propelling the bar. It is so hard to "read" how to do it and translate that into how it "feels". Even with someone coaching you it still takes a while for it to CLICK.

But you have shown that you are willing to open your mind, and try other things...the sign of a good coach.
 
controlled shove, that make sense as a visual. ill tinker with it again tonight. gotta go back for cardio and posing, ill do some light presses as a mild pump. hehe.

no more talk of pizza. i have 15 days until i can have some.
 
bignate73 said:
controlled shove, that make sense as a visual. ill tinker with it again tonight. gotta go back for cardio and posing, ill do some light presses as a mild pump. hehe.

Spatts uses the compares it to the action of a crow bar...which makes it easier to visualize. The more force that you generate driving yourself into the bench from your feet up....the more force that you can deliver to the barbell. You have to STAY TIGHT though. If you aren't maintaing a tight core...then all the force will be lost. You should be driving from the heels....and drive yourself BACK..not up. You should be tryin to push the bench back....not pushing your hips up off the bench. If you try this and your ass is coming off the bench...move your feet further out in front of you....you should set your legs up as a solid foundation like you were going to squat.
 
Also there is another technique for leg drive while benching but you need a wide competition style bench. If you squeeze your upper thighs around the knee and squeeze them into the bench then yu can get a lot of leg drive too without much from your heels. Its hard to do this well without a good bench-it works well for me
 
Spatterson, I acknowledge your point. Without knowing the specifics of his impairment it's hard to tell him exactly what exercises are suitable. I agree that flies target the chest and don't use shoulder rotation....I just find them an extremely weak substitute.

As for scientific knowledge, as long as it is acknowledged that it has its place then I'm happy.

Hell, I'm not strong at all as I've just started but I feel confident giving a lot better advice than the vast majority of people a lot stronger than me.

-Zulu
 
Pizza??? Where???

It is all learned on the field...

B True
 
BTrue, you realize that MANY athletes such as olympic athletes have coaches who are a lot less strong than them, right?

Simple question:

10 randomly selected people. You or Mel Siff can train them. Do you seriously think you would help them achieve their goals better? This isn't to be a prick; I respect your knowledge and experience greatly, but I think there are a great deal of qualified scientific experts out there.

And it's not all learned on the field. There are masterminds behind everyplay. Just look at basketball, the triangle offense, etc, etc.....

I'm acknowledging your point of view and I think it has merit. Maybe we can both see eye to eye here.

-Zulu
 
This thread and the similar "lats vs. pecs" one have led me to wonder exactly what the pecs 'do' anatomically. I'm still working with really light weight, but I'm thinking of eliminating db (bench) presses until I get my bad rotator cuff up to par. I would still do closed-grip presses and other things for shoulder and tris. But I worry what I would be "missing" (other than potential injury) if I skip the bench. I'm a novice to heavy lifting, at this point training for overall strength and increased lean mass, not competition (BB or PL).

Can someone tell me what the pecs do or point me to a Web page that discusses it? I tried searching online, but can't think of good search terms that keep me for looking for the proverbial needle in a haystack.
 
ZZuluZ said:
BTrue, you realize that MANY athletes such as olympic athletes have coaches who are a lot less strong than them, right?

Simple question:

10 randomly selected people. You or Mel Siff can train them. Do you seriously think you would help them achieve their goals better? This isn't to be a prick; I respect your knowledge and experience greatly, but I think there are a great deal of qualified scientific experts out there.

And it's not all learned on the field. There are masterminds behind everyplay. Just look at basketball, the triangle offense, etc, etc.....

I'm acknowledging your point of view and I think it has merit. Maybe we can both see eye to eye here.

-Zulu

Mel Siff...hmmm...I know who he is but have never met him. Charles Poloquin...don't think too highly of a lot of his methods. Louie Simmons...have never met him either. The WSB principles change constantly which is another reason why US powerlifters are setting records constantly and US olympic lifters are not.

Mel Siff will never be able to fully teach someone how to bench press 600 pounds till he has done it himself. He does not know what it takes both mentally and physically to do that. Louie Simmons does. I take Louie Simmons's word over Mel Siff's advice any day of the week.

If you use the example that Mel Siff's advice is better than mine...then I will go ahead and pose the question is your advice better than mine also? Show me what you have done. Show me where you have grown and where you have increased your bench press by 400 pounds. Show me how you had to force feed yourself and how you stressed at night about the next day's workout...and still did it. I am waiting...

B True
 
Makedah, my shoulder is doing so much better now, and alot of it was not only backing off to rehab, but finding out what rehab work worked for me. All the literature says to NOT do bb movements with bad rotators, but I found that my joint was much more stable in the rotation with the bb than the dbs. The db's allowed me to move in and out when weak; whereas, the bb kept the motion restricted to front and back.

I rarely work my chest. Maybe once a month, but it's very well developed. I do seated flies (among other things), and I think, from the opinions on this thread, that I must do them differently than everyone else. I tuck my rear end way back into the gap between the back pad and the seat (your machine may not have a gap there), I arch back and get my shoulder blades squeezed together on the back pad, my arms are at shoulder level, elbows are facing out, not down, and my shoulders are back/chest out/head up. I do not let my shoudlers separate during the press portion of the fly. Perhaps this is why I find them to be a great addition for pec recruitment where others who use a different form do not.

In terms of anatomy, do you mean what purpose do they serve in kinesiology or in general?
 
BTrue, you don't get it. You're asking me questions BASED on the terms I just rejected.

And just BTW, Poliquin lifts MAJOR weights so I suggest we all listen to him.

What does Mel Siff know? He's only the most respected Weightlifting expert in modern history. Then again....he doesn't press 600 pounds!

Again, you still don't get it. There is no correlation between strength and knowledge. Or hypertrophy and knowledge.

This is exactly why people don't read Flex. People who lift big can be idiots.

-Zulu
 
And BTW, you may not like Poliquin but he makes 300$ an hour off phone consultations and trains MEDAL WINNING athletes.

But what does he know?

-Zulu
 
Why any able-minded and able-bodied person would make a choice between science and experience is beyond me. Without both, well, let's just say that it's easy to think you know it all when you don't know what you don't know. :)

Zzulu, I was reading back through the thread, and one thing I failed to communicate is that the PLers bench does work the pectorals significantly enough to give PLers (myself included) VERY well developed chests. It's just not the "primary" mover. This would explain why I said bench like a PLer or do low rotation db/bb work. I can't believe I didn't clarify that. Sorry for the confusion.
 
ZZuluZ said:
And BTW, you may not like Poliquin but he makes 300$ an hour off phone consultations and trains MEDAL WINNING athletes.

But what does he know?

-Zulu

And Louie Simmons trains all of his gym members for free. And if you call him up he will help you without charging you a consultation fee. He trains WORLD CHAMPIONS.

What's your point?
 
Firstly, Louie Simmons and Charles Poliquin, have great respect for each other. I was on Poliquin's webpage recently, and he recomended anyone interested in getting stronger to go see a WSB seminar.

Nextly, as was stated early in this thread, there are no universally true theories for strength gain or bodybuilding. People are to individula, and will respond as such.

Third, you don't need to be able to bench big to teach the movement. My boss is a former strength coach at Penn State, he weighs about a 155lbs and benches about 225. However, he had 4 linemen benching over 500 at one point.

Is science the answer, absolutely not, I have a professor, who has a body like a baked potato, and can barely bench the bar. He tells me everyday that my training methods are incorrect. He has also told me, that some of the results my clients have had where impossible, and where simply an error in measurements. Conversely, experience is not the only way to go either. I have meet head friends who when looking to get stronger, will do 20 sets of bench pressing in a workout. That would probably kill the average trainee.

Anyway, this has been one of the greatest threads I have ever read on Elite. I think the only change necessary, is that some individuals stop being so damn sensitive, and just take these posts for what they are. Questions to gain more knowledge, and see what the other individual is thinking. I mean hey, we can only learn from each other right?
 
If Louie Simmons had to watch most of the WSB devotees on here, he'd either laugh or cringe. We're ALL likely doing modifications, intentionally or not.
 
Spatterson,

Tx for the tip about bbs vs. dbs. I understand what you're saying there - it seems easier to bring a db past the safe range of motion than a bb. I'm not strong enough to press the bench's bar yet, but the gym has lighter pre-weighted bars around - I could try it with that. I'm not experiencing pain yet with the press (unlike with OHPs - OUCH!), but I don't want to court injury.

update: This morning at the gym, I pressed w/ bbs and then with dbs. Based on my brief experiment, I think you're right. The dbs had my shoulders wobbling -- which I don't think would necessarily be a bad thing (learning to stabilize) if it weren't for the bad cuff. I was also a bit achy afterward.

spatterson said:
In terms of anatomy, do you mean what purpose do they serve in kinesiology or in general?

Kinesiology. I guess I don't know what "in general" would mean. :confused: I'm interested in their role in body movement.
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying Science is it all.

What I'm saying is that experience is it all either. I disagree with people simply telling others to seek out the strongest most built guy around.

I don't really think we're disagreeing here.

-Zulu
 
ZZuluZ said:
I'm not saying Science is it all.

What I'm saying is that experience is it all either. I disagree with people simply telling others to seek out the strongest most built guy around.

I don't really think we're disagreeing here.

-Zulu

Don't sweat it Zulu......some of us can see exactly what you mean. You would be nuts to dismiss either experience or science.....they work best when put together. Several people have agreed with you in this thread.

Somebody posted the argument that you couldn't tell somebody how to bench 600 until you have done it (It was Bfold I believe). If that were the case, we would never make progress. Everybody would be sitting around waiting for somebody to tell us how to do something new.....
 
Makedah,

The "upper pecs" is the Pectoralis Major, and it has a clavicular head and a sternal head. In other words there are two origins (sternum and ribs) and one insertion, the humerus.

As for function, the biarticulate sternal head of the pectoralis major enters passive insufficiency through the completion of shoulder transverse extension or transverse abducted when the shoulder girdle is more retracted or through the completion of shoulder abduction when the scapula is more rotated upward and elevated. The biarticulate sternal head of the pectoralis major enters active insufficiency through the completion of shoulder transverse flexion or transverse adduction when the shoulder girdle is more protracted or through the completion of shoulder adduction when the scapula is more rotated downward and depressed.

The sternal head of the pectoralis major is a stronger shoulder transverse flexor (shoulder internally rotated) than transverse adductor (shoulder externally rotated). It is a stronger shoulder adductor when the shoulder is internally rotated. It is also a stronger shoulder extensor when the shoulder is internally rotated. Incidentally, the sternal head of the pectoralis major does not extend the shoulder beyond anatomical position (shoulder hyperextension).

The pectoralis minor starts at the ribs and inserts at the scapula. It functions in abduction, downward rotation, and depression of the scapula.

I have no idea what people call the "lower pec." Probably the same thing people call the "lower abs." There is no "lower ab" except in exercise fairy tale land. :)
 
Sheesh my head hurts now......

With regard to your last few lines.....

What people call the 'lower pec' is the sternal head of the pec major. The 'upper pec' is the clavicular head. So both upper and lower pecs are pec major.

This is different to what most people think......many people think that the upper pec is either pec minor or major and the lower pec is the remaining pec (so pec major if upper is pec minor).......

Here's a link with pics....

http://www.exrx.net/Muscles/PectoralisMinor.html

spatterson said:
Makedah,

The "upper pecs" is the Pectoralis Major, and it has a clavicular head and a sternal head. In other words there are two origins (sternum and ribs) and one insertion, the humerus.

As for function, the biarticulate sternal head of the pectoralis major enters passive insufficiency through the completion of shoulder transverse extension or transverse abducted when the shoulder girdle is more retracted or through the completion of shoulder abduction when the scapula is more rotated upward and elevated. The biarticulate sternal head of the pectoralis major enters active insufficiency through the completion of shoulder transverse flexion or transverse adduction when the shoulder girdle is more protracted or through the completion of shoulder adduction when the scapula is more rotated downward and depressed.

The sternal head of the pectoralis major is a stronger shoulder transverse flexor (shoulder internally rotated) than transverse adductor (shoulder externally rotated). It is a stronger shoulder adductor when the shoulder is internally rotated. It is also a stronger shoulder extensor when the shoulder is internally rotated. Incidentally, the sternal head of the pectoralis major does not extend the shoulder beyond anatomical position (shoulder hyperextension).

The pectoralis minor starts at the ribs and inserts at the scapula. It functions in abduction, downward rotation, and depression of the scapula.

I have no idea what people call the "lower pec." Probably the same thing people call the "lower abs." There is no "lower ab" except in exercise fairy tale land. :)
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom