the Universe Is Not "Billions of Years"Old (Imnotdutch)

[big_bad_buff]

none as convincing as lucy.

just goes to show you then doesnt it

you need to read up on your so called missing link

 

[big_bad_buff]

OK. My apologise... you're not bright at all.

Gooo Baaaack toooo myyyy preeevviioousss poosst, looook carefuuullly foorrr thheesssse things '?'. Theey're caaallled Q U E S T I O N M A R K S. Arrrre weee understanding each other now? <--- that's a question.

Newbie? <---- another one. LMAO!

a canadian with attitude lol


i think this is were you would insert **the flood**

 

[***]

just goes to show you then doesnt it

you need to read up on your so called missing link

???

please enlighten me.

 

[Imnotdutch]

This could get interesting

 

[CanadianCripple]

a canadian with attitude lol


i think this is were you would insert **the flood**

Sorry for taxing your brain. I should have known better.

I shouldn't have expected you to understand what I was saying... after all:

http://www.cnn.com/2003/HEALTH/03/03/car.seats.ap/index.html

Oh oh! Another CNN link. Try & read it all. Good luck!

 

[big_bad_buff]

???

please enlighten me.

run a search on google (lucy missing link)

http://www.forerunner.com/forerunner/X0714_Lucy_fails_test.html

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/1261.asp

http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/lucy.html

http://musicinit.com/etnot/lucy.html

http://www.exchangedlife.com/skeptic/missing.htm

 

[big_bad_buff]

i like this link
http://www.exchangedlife.com/skeptic/missing.htm

 

[Imnotdutch]

If you quote biased sources then you are bound to get biased answers........the links I checked were all from creationist sources.

I'm sure that there are plenty of scientists that are sceptical aobut lucy.......why not quote them?

run a search on google (lucy missing link)

http://www.forerunner.com/forerunner/X0714_Lucy_fails_test.html

http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs/1261.asp

http://www.users.bigpond.com/rdoolan/lucy.html

http://musicinit.com/etnot/lucy.html

http://www.exchangedlife.com/skeptic/missing.htm

 

[Imnotdutch]

i like this link
http://www.exchangedlife.com/skeptic/missing.htm

Wow a site that claims to be unbiased..........and is then as biased as it gets. Talk about hidden agenda.

 

[CardinalSin]

Buff, who wrote these articles? Do you know? Anthropologists? I doubt it. They are not credible at all.

And you are right that lucy is not the most credible skeleton. they have found even better skeletons that prove our evolutionary past. I believe their used to be more than one species of "human" on earth. We are not unique, we just survived.

Later i will post you some links to back up my argument, but i have to go to school now. They will be from credible sites, i promise.

Why are you so stubborn to take the bible literally. I personally am athiest/agnostic but i can respect most anyones religios views. I cannot however understand how anyone can take the bible literally. Its insane. People crafted these theories to try to understand what they could not explain scientifically, and to keep order in society. They are not true.