javaguru
Banned
Honestly, certain aspects of socialism are appealingSue me, I actually WANT to go live on a commune, I just can't find one. What's so wrong with pooling resources and working together toward a common good? I don't, and will never, understand why socialism is such a dirty word in this country. Frankly, a society completely focused on materialism and greed, driven only by self interest, is an ugly beast.
When you start saying "if you can't afford medical care you don't deserve it" or "if you can't afford a good education, and aren't smart enough to get scholarships, then you should spend the rest of your life poor" it's elitism, and that's better than socialism? Whatever happened to a little basic compassion, lending your fellow man a hand up?
If a "rich" person is going to resent paying more taxes than a "poor" person then let's take it to the logical conclusion, why do we permit mentally and physically handicapped individuals to collect SSD? For that matter, why do we even allow babies that are born that are hopeless cripples, that are abandoned by their parents, to live at all?
Why is it that the edges can be hard when we're talking about the top tax brackets versus the bottom brackets, and yet they start going all fuzzy when we're talking about people who will NEVER contribute a dime to society and be nothing but a 75 year drain on Social Security, Medicaid and all the other public service programs?
The reason is that socialism doesn't work in practice. The Soviet Union, North Korea, Cuba...Pilgrims are all historical examples of the failure of socialism. The pilgrims lived under a socialist commune charter initially but once they adopted private ownership they thrived. The colony leader remarked in his diary that once private ownership was adopted the women that used to complain of sickness and weakness as an excuse to avoid toiling in the fields became strong of body and spirit when they were working for themselves. In economics it's called the tragedy of the commons....something owned by everyone isn't properly cared about by anyone.
The top producers already pay most of the income tax in the country, while over 40% of Americans pay no income tax. As far as corporations are concerned, higher taxes on corporations are a tax on everyone that buys goods or services from that corporation. Likewise, the current progressive tax code is a burden on economic development in this country because corporations will buy some politicians to modify the tax code and pass it on to consumers as part of doing business. Microsft learned the hard way that spending millions of dollars on lobbyists is cheaper than defending against a government lawsuit that went nowhere.