Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Sweating = Fat Loss

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cuts
  • Start date Start date
Oh yeah ImnotDutch... I know that hemaphrodite and transexual are two different things ;)...
 
Well that makes a whole lot more sense now.....

Truce.......sure. :)



Cuts said:
Yes, it is indeed the Hypothalamus that regulates your body's core temp and heat loss/preservation mechanisms. I agree wholeheartedly that that's what's happening when you sweat... your body is trying to cool itself down.

Now, I'd like to comment on my original post. Of course I wasn't trying to say that if as long as one is sweating, he is losing fat... I may not be the smartest guy out there, but even I know that the fat dude that sits in the Sauna for an hour (there's actually a guy at my gym that does this too) is not burning fat... he's just losing sub-q water. All I was saying is that for us--guys who lift weights and do cardio and diet--more sweating in this context does indeed reflect increased calories burned, increased BMR, and increased fat loss. I was totally joking about the "Biochemsitry Big Guns" thing... I don't know why y'all had to take it so seriously and start to try and disprove me at all costs. And the fact of the matter is, although I may indeed have been able to do some hardcore research into the matter and come up with some poignant rebuttles of my own, I just didn't think it was worth it B/C... without getting overly analytical about it, my original point "Sweating = Fat loss" is indeed true, as I'm sure you all would agree.

And the rest of the stuff about Imnotdutch/Shirley being a hemaphrodite lol... well I was just ------- around -- just like I do with my friends in real life. So, bro don't take it so seriously o.k.? Truce?
 
Man Cuts! That rant cracked me up...

First - I'm just an MBA dick so Bio-Chem stuff is too far removed from my Marketing and Finance stuff to make sense :p

Second, I understood you original post at face value - Add enough intensity in you exercise to create a good sweat and you are definitely losing fat !

:D :goof:
 
CrimsonKing said:
Man Cuts! That rant cracked me up...

First - I'm just an MBA dick so Bio-Chem stuff is too far removed from my Marketing and Finance stuff to make sense :p

Second, I understood you original post at face value - Add enough intensity in you exercise to create a good sweat and you are definitely losing fat !

:D :goof:

Sure... NOW somebody takes my side... after I friggin surrender lol...

Karma for you bro

(By the way, SOMEBODY gave me negative Karma for this thread--I'm not gonna reciprocate though--whatever)
 
Cuts said:


Sure... NOW somebody takes my side... after I friggin surrender lol...

Karma for you bro

(By the way, SOMEBODY gave me negative Karma for this thread--I'm not gonna reciprocate though--whatever)

I suspect that the negative karma (which did not come from me.....I have the balls to sign my karma) came as a result of the name calling not your reasoning.

Read through your posts......the minute I disagreed with you, you resorted to name calling instead of putting your arguments forward. Many people take offence at that......
 
CrimsonKing said:
Man Cuts! That rant cracked me up...

First - I'm just an MBA dick so Bio-Chem stuff is too far removed from my Marketing and Finance stuff to make sense :p

Second, I understood you original post at face value - Add enough intensity in you exercise to create a good sweat and you are definitely losing fat !

:D :goof:

The original post inferred that sweating was necessary for fat loss (it isn't)....the following attempt at a biochem justification looked like an attempt to back this up. That is what people were arguing against.
 
Imnotdutch said:


The original post inferred that sweating was necessary for fat loss (it isn't)....the following attempt at a biochem justification looked like an attempt to back this up. That is what people were arguing against.

I disagree .. he didn't infer it was necessary for fat loss.. rather that for HIM sweat while working out (or on DNP cycle) resulting in good fat loss.. Its all about intensity.. that was the inference I drew from the post.. I agree he did diverge down the Bio-Chem route as a way to backup his claim.. but to simple ol biz man like me its just a matter of intensity... The rest of the rant was a amusing debate over egos...

:D
 
Imnotdutch said:

The original post inferred that sweating was necessary for fat loss (it isn't)....the following attempt at a biochem justification looked like an attempt to back this up. That is what people were arguing against.

Oh c'mon Imnotdutch... you know damn well (or you should know) that I was NOT posting a new friggin hypothesis on "The etiology of fat loss -- a Biochemical perspective." I was simply stating something that in it's basic form, EVERYBODY on this board (including you) would agree with... the more one sweats, the more cals he's burning, and the more fat he's burning. That's IT bro. Now sure, you could probably come up with lots of examples of where sweating doesn't equate to fat loss... fat guy in sauna, trauma patient going into hypovolemic shock, drug reactions, etc... but I know you all know what I meant. And the "biochem justification" thing was a friggin joke bro! Do you really think that if I were to start doing research into it and pulling out studies and papers to quote and defend my "theory" that I'd title it "BIOCHEMISTRY BIG GUNS" lol? After that, I was just roasting you to have some fun lol... I think you took it too seriously. I mean I didn't mind your (or others') insults at me lol-- I mean, I agree, my most-muscular shot does look a LITTLE gay and kind of like I shit in my pants lol!

Oh, and I never said that the negative Karma was from you... I figured that if you had sent it, you'd at least have the balls (or ovaries ;)) to put your handle with it... stay cool bro
 
CrimsonKing said:

I disagree .. he didn't infer it was necessary for fat loss.. rather that for HIM sweat while working out (or on DNP cycle) resulting in good fat loss.. Its all about intensity.. that was the inference I drew from the post.. I agree he did diverge down the Bio-Chem route as a way to backup his claim.. but to simple ol biz man like me its just a matter of intensity... The rest of the rant was a amusing debate over egos...
:D

CrimsonKing is officially my new Elite best friend lol. That's exactly what I meant. And yeah the whole Shirley/transexual/hemaphrodite thing was just for kicks lol...
 
Top Bottom