Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
Steroids for ATHLETES
- Thread starter The Man Child
- Start date
monkeyballs
New member
Hey...EPO shouldn't be fucked with without a Doctor looking over you all the time. Pro Cyclists have team doctors that monitor hemocrit levels all the fucking time. EPO is not something that you just keep in your medicine cabinet with your other juice and leave a post here on the board when you get a headache. EPO will kill you VERY quickly if not used correctly. It can even kill you even when it is used right. Stay away from that shit unless you have someone with a M.D. and a love of doped cyclists next to you at all times.
monkeyballs
New member
Hey Nautica,
So I'm wondering why GH hasn't recived much attention on this post. Since most athletes have to deal with drug tests, wouldn't GH with some mild oral (I.E. Var) be a great choice for an athlete wishing to put on quality gains that can be held on to once the cycle ends. Also, Test and other heavy androgens carry the burden of allowing the body to become stronger than conective tissues, thus making an athlete injury prone. In a sport like football, where injuries are common in the first place, wouldn't an athlete who is more likely to be injured be almost useless even with tremedous AS induced gains. GH strengthens conective tissues as well as slightly promoting strenght gains and altering body composition. Plus, tests are no longer a hassle. GH/var sounds like a good combo to me. (i'm hoping that you agree because I'm about to start a cycle of my own)
So I'm wondering why GH hasn't recived much attention on this post. Since most athletes have to deal with drug tests, wouldn't GH with some mild oral (I.E. Var) be a great choice for an athlete wishing to put on quality gains that can be held on to once the cycle ends. Also, Test and other heavy androgens carry the burden of allowing the body to become stronger than conective tissues, thus making an athlete injury prone. In a sport like football, where injuries are common in the first place, wouldn't an athlete who is more likely to be injured be almost useless even with tremedous AS induced gains. GH strengthens conective tissues as well as slightly promoting strenght gains and altering body composition. Plus, tests are no longer a hassle. GH/var sounds like a good combo to me. (i'm hoping that you agree because I'm about to start a cycle of my own)
monkeyballs
New member
Gonna bump.
Any GH users feel free to chime in.
Any GH users feel free to chime in.
nautica
New member
Oh yeah, monkeyballs. GH is definately the greatest choice for athletes. Especially athletes past 25.
If an athlete can afford it they could stay on it all the time and not worry about testing at the moment.
Although, I have read that the IOC has come up with a new test to distinquish the difference between exogenous and endogenous HGH, but the test is not yet 100%, so they have not started using it. But they say it is coming.
Personally, I don't buy it. How the hell could a test tell the difference, unless you levels were just extremely high. But given the extremely short half-life of hgh, it would still be almost impossible.
anyway until then sub Q's for every athlete.
. For strength athletes, it would not hurt to throw in a little slin also. And if one really wanted to get dirty IGF-1.
Nautica
If an athlete can afford it they could stay on it all the time and not worry about testing at the moment.
Although, I have read that the IOC has come up with a new test to distinquish the difference between exogenous and endogenous HGH, but the test is not yet 100%, so they have not started using it. But they say it is coming.
Personally, I don't buy it. How the hell could a test tell the difference, unless you levels were just extremely high. But given the extremely short half-life of hgh, it would still be almost impossible.
anyway until then sub Q's for every athlete.
. For strength athletes, it would not hurt to throw in a little slin also. And if one really wanted to get dirty IGF-1.Nautica
monkeyballs
New member
At the moment I'm 24...so GH is on the horizon. The guy who won the gold medal in my event (with a world record) was 32 and eastern european. I can smell the GH all over him, and just about every other european as well. As for IGF-1 and Slin, both are on the banned substance list, but how the hell could they test for those if they can't test for GH. As for a test on GH...I wouldn't be suprised if they have one by the next olympics, and I also wouldn't be suprised to see an undetectable version of GH soon thereafter. Chicken and the Egg yet again.
monkeyballs
New member
At the moment I'm 24...so GH is on the horizon. As for IGF-1 and Slin, both are on the banned substance list, but how the hell could they test for those if they can't test for GH. As for a test on GH...I wouldn't be suprised if they have one by the next olympics, and I also wouldn't be suprised to see an undetectable version of GH soon thereafter. Chicken and the Egg yet again.
monkeyballs
New member
not sure why there are two posts...
40butpumpin
New member
Great thread, definitely deserves a bump. Great info guys, thanks!
