Well for one thing you would think it would have to be cycles sufficient enough to
affect your sperm count dramatically. So if you were to use a modest, fairly short stack
I would think that you wouldn't necessarily be a candidate for this little twist. But if
you were taking the kind of cycles that make your sperm count near zero at times I
could see this happening. I know that there are differences between the male and
female sperm. I believe there are more male sperm but the female sperm is more
resilient, but it's been awhile since I took a biology class. But anyway, let's say I'm
on track here- usually everything evens out and the result is about 50/50 boys to
girls (although it's a little known fact that there are more guys out there in younger
age groups and women are a majority based on sheer lifespan). However, when the
sperm are placed under some kind of special stress it stands to reason that the
female sperm (or female producing sperm as it were) would have somewhat of
an advantage. Like I said, there have also been studies which have shown that
men who are exposed to very high g-forces many times are more likely to father
girls. Anyway, of course you could father a boy, even on a large stack if you had
sperm, but if the difference was even 10 percent it would be worth finding out
how you could adjust your cycle so you had a better chance of fathering a boy, if
that was your goal. And if you want a daughter, of course don't worry.
But the thing is, it may be a larger difference than that, as the lady that wrote
the article mentioned that she had previously wondered why so many pro
bodybuilders were fathering girls. I personally haven't polled all the Olympia
competitors so I couldn't say either way.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 
i don't know what to believe
