Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Steroid effects on a non trainer?

windymill

New member
If someone who led a sedentary lifestyle (sat at a desk all day, did no cardio or weights) took steroids, what would the effect be? Surely even in high doses it would have little of the effects that would be expected?
 
someone that is a regualr person, works in a sedentary possition , doesn;t train and eat like an active person will gain squat. but if they do workout , diet and rest well, no matter where they work, actually sitting around all day would be better for gains, than for someone like a carpenter, then they would gain nicely.
 
If that person doesn't train, then steroids would be a dumb choice. This person would get the sides(maybe), with no results to speak of.
 
It would depend which ones they were taking. Anavar is given to people that have lost muscle from illness or extensive surgery to cause muscle growth. No matter what is taken, the gains wouldn't be significant enough to notice.
 
I recall seeing a Dbol study several months ago that was done on "average individuals" and I think the results were and average of 8 lbs gained after 60 days.

Risk v reward would not be worth it for someone who doesn't lift though.


Bluesman
 
They pour the stuff into cattle, fina mostly, just to get them to grow by standing around all day and chomping.
 
i read somewhere 1000 mg a week or more even without training you would still gain muscle but that would be very stupid if your gonna be a lazy bastard then deal with looking like one
 
nothing`
 
why would you even consider it?? kinda of a dumb question imo.
 
I still can't beleive I'm reading all that crap. If you take supraphysiological doses of anabolic steroids, guess what happens. ANABOLISM. You gotta understand that steroids were designed to promote ANABOLISM in humans, especially for those not able to train. If someone takes roids and eat well, while not training they should actually gain muscle and strenght.

Saying that you won't gain anything with anabolic steroids is like saying that corticoids, won't cause catabolism if you work out and eat well. lmao, that would be so dump...
 
sweed said:
someone that is a regualr person, works in a sedentary possition , doesn;t train and eat like an active person will gain squat. but if they do workout , diet and rest well, no matter where they work, actually sitting around all day would be better for gains, than for someone like a carpenter, then they would gain nicely.
AAAAcctually I read a study with 3 double blind control groups with one group using test and not training gaining more lean mass than the people who trained naturally for the same amount of time. of course the group that trained and juiced gained the most...duh!

Quad
 
i agree with the last two posts and the side would be the same as with one training.also if fact most have more appatite so more food intake combined with a/s and no training will give gains im not to sure on hardness and vascularity???? cancer patients gain considerably but alot is water and they are sick.
 
Quadsweep said:
AAAAcctually I read a study with 3 double blind control groups with one group using test and not training gaining more lean mass than the people who trained naturally for the same amount of time. of course the group that trained and juiced gained the most...duh!

Quad

double blinded? you gotta know if you're working out or not! :)
just kidding, I know it's double blinded about the testosterone...
 
Koivu_11 said:
double blinded? you gotta know if you're working out or not! :)
just kidding, I know it's double blinded about the testosterone...
Not to mention how difficult it would be to workout blind. :)

I read some studies also, which said the same some of the other posts. You would gain some muscle but not as much if you worked out.
 
The point, though, is that farmers aren't going to stuff their cows full of juice if it doesn't help their bottom line. So, the farmers, at least, are convinced that the cows will grow more on fina than off it despite just chomping grass and lazing around all day.

As QuadSweep mentioned, there have been studies where sedentary steroid-using groups have gained more muscle than active non-using groups. Always the active and 'on' group gains most.

Now, if they could just invent a deadlift machine for cattle.
 
I understand they would gain some mass, but I stick with the idea that it would not be worth it. Not in that case.
 
I dont know which is worse, the fact that someone posted this dumbass question, or that my dumbass clicked on it.
 
gettinripped said:
why would you even consider it?? kinda of a dumb question imo.

not a dumb question at all. i have wondered what if any body changes would occur if a person does not lift using AAS. they were not originally made for bodybuilders, so they must do something.
 
your appetite would go thru the roof....your calorie intake woulld then double and hence the no activity....your not burning off the calories...YOU WOULD GET FAT....im sure you might put on some muscle mass due to everyday movement but notihing noticeable
 
CENTURION44 said:
your appetite would go thru the roof....your calorie intake woulld then double and hence the no activity....your not burning off the calories...YOU WOULD GET FAT....im sure you might put on some muscle mass due to everyday movement but notihing noticeable

that might be a good thing if you have experienced wasting from chemotherapy, AIDS, a spinal cord injury.

a normal person may get fat but a seriuosly ill person may be able to put on some healthy weight. a too thin body can not perform normal functions or effectivelyh fight off oppurtunistic disease, like an anorexic.
 
The point it who cares, hopefully none of us will ever try this. What would happen if took diet pills and didnt diet? WHO CARES, wasting space.
 
glennds said:
that might be a good thing if you have experienced wasting from chemotherapy, AIDS, a spinal cord injury.

a normal person may get fat but a seriuosly ill person may be able to put on some healthy weight. a too thin body can not perform normal functions or effectivelyh fight off oppurtunistic disease, like an anorexic.

yes but the question was if a non active person took gear
 
Koivu_11 said:
If someone takes roids and eat well, while not training they should actually gain muscle and strenght.
Muscle would be gained, but I don't think strength would increase.
 
windymill said:
If someone who led a sedentary lifestyle (sat at a desk all day, did no cardio or weights) took steroids, what would the effect be? Surely even in high doses it would have little of the effects that would be expected?

I know a Marine who shoots sust weekly and does only his training (infantry), no additional weights. He's grown more body hair, become fatter and his wife complains of body odor (I'm serious). I think it's aromatizing.
 
athlete.03 said:
I know a Marine who shoots sust weekly and does only his training (infantry), no additional weights. He's grown more body hair, become fatter and his wife complains of body odor (I'm serious). I think it's aromatizing.

not because of the sus, maybe just because he is getting older, is lazy, and has something causing BO.
 
CENTURION44 said:
your appetite would go thru the roof....your calorie intake woulld then double and hence the no activity....your not burning off the calories...YOU WOULD GET FAT....im sure you might put on some muscle mass due to everyday movement but notihing noticeable
this is the correct answer. it is a stupid idea, it will not transform your body for the better. go to the fucking gym.
 
trying2grow101 said:
i read somewhere 1000 mg a week or more even without training you would still gain muscle but that would be very stupid if your gonna be a lazy bastard then deal with looking like one


THE BEST SINGLE POST I HAVE EVER READ !
 
I watched a guy do a cycle of 500mg enth for 10wks, 30mg dbol 1-4, and he only worked out once the entire cycle...Obviously his results might have been alot better if he was training, and some ppl might call it a waste of money, but he gained 10lbs of muscle. Not fat, muscle, and it was very noticeable. I'm sure the results would vary by person, and he may have just had good genetics, but steroids without training can still obviously give good gains.
 
I guess we've all heard stories of people running cycles and just forgetting to work out. What a waste of another ten pounds or so.
 
Top Bottom