Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below ultragainz
New member
yea send me the study
sorry but this is off subject..read this is if you are good at writing papers...
- Thread starter ultragainz
- Start date
Doctor Dbol
New member
Ultragainz,
With your above average literary skills displayed on this board all the time, I find it very hard to believe you can't write this paper on your own.
With your above average literary skills displayed on this board all the time, I find it very hard to believe you can't write this paper on your own.
ultragainz
New member
i can write it on my own..i wrote too many papers this week i dont want to write this one..iam getting lazy thats it...
Here's the study:
The DiFranza study, reported in the December 1991 Journal of the American Medical Association, suggests two possible reasons for the younger kids' familiarity with Camel. One is that children are exposed to more Camel advertisements than adults are. The other explanation is that the Old Joe character is just more interesting to kids.
A study by P. M. Fischer and others supports the second theory. Fischer questioned 5,000 kids to find out how well they recognized brand logos. The study found that many three- to six-year-old children were just as captivated by Old Joe Camel promoting cigarettes as they were by Mickey Mouse in advertisements for the Disney Channel.
The actual source
Fischer PM, Schwartz MP, Richards JW Jr, Goldstein AO, Rojas TH. Brand logo recognition by 3- to 6-year-old children: Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. JAMA. 1991: 266: 3145-3148.
The DiFranza study, reported in the December 1991 Journal of the American Medical Association, suggests two possible reasons for the younger kids' familiarity with Camel. One is that children are exposed to more Camel advertisements than adults are. The other explanation is that the Old Joe character is just more interesting to kids.
A study by P. M. Fischer and others supports the second theory. Fischer questioned 5,000 kids to find out how well they recognized brand logos. The study found that many three- to six-year-old children were just as captivated by Old Joe Camel promoting cigarettes as they were by Mickey Mouse in advertisements for the Disney Channel.
The actual source
Fischer PM, Schwartz MP, Richards JW Jr, Goldstein AO, Rojas TH. Brand logo recognition by 3- to 6-year-old children: Mickey Mouse and Old Joe the Camel. JAMA. 1991: 266: 3145-3148.
OK, ultra.....here's your paper.
Cigarette advertisements portray smoking as a normal, healthy, fun-filled activity. This undermines the message from parents and teachers that smoking causes death and disease, and accordingly, should be banned.
Each day the tobacco industry loses 5,000 customers who die or quit tobacco use. As a result, by 1993, tobacco companies were spending over $6 billion annually to recruit new and current smokers. (90% of current smokers began while still in high school).
Cigarette advertisements tend to emphasize youthful vigor, sexual attraction, and independence - themes that are likely to appeal to teenagers and young adults. The three most heavily advertised brands of cigarettes - Marlboro, Camel and Newport - are responsible for 86% of the illegal youth market but only 35% of overall sales. 36% of cigarette ads are in magazines that reach teens.
Tobacco company spending for specialty gift items (such as t-shirts, caps, sunglasses, key chains, calendars and sporting goods) bearing a cigarette logo increased by 122% from $340 million in 1992 to $756 million in 1993.
"Old Joe," the cartoon camel used to advertise Camel cigarettes, is as familiar to 6 year old children as Mickey Mouse's silhouette. A study found that 91% of 6 year olds not only recognized the Old Joe image, but were able to correctly link him with cigarettes. This was the same recognition level measured for the Disney icon.
Tobacco companies can only argue that, to ban advertising would be an affront to the principles of American free enterprise, since the health risks of tobacco are no longer in dispute. This is a weak argument in view of the unique dangers of the product: All cigarettes contain carcinogens—whether there are few or many, they are still toxic. Cigarette smoke also contains more than 4,000 chemicals that are harmful to humans. Four million people will die from smoking this year, and create an enormous burden on our healthcare systems.
There really is no pro and con here....advertising tobacco should be banned.
Cigarette advertisements portray smoking as a normal, healthy, fun-filled activity. This undermines the message from parents and teachers that smoking causes death and disease, and accordingly, should be banned.
Each day the tobacco industry loses 5,000 customers who die or quit tobacco use. As a result, by 1993, tobacco companies were spending over $6 billion annually to recruit new and current smokers. (90% of current smokers began while still in high school).
Cigarette advertisements tend to emphasize youthful vigor, sexual attraction, and independence - themes that are likely to appeal to teenagers and young adults. The three most heavily advertised brands of cigarettes - Marlboro, Camel and Newport - are responsible for 86% of the illegal youth market but only 35% of overall sales. 36% of cigarette ads are in magazines that reach teens.
Tobacco company spending for specialty gift items (such as t-shirts, caps, sunglasses, key chains, calendars and sporting goods) bearing a cigarette logo increased by 122% from $340 million in 1992 to $756 million in 1993.
"Old Joe," the cartoon camel used to advertise Camel cigarettes, is as familiar to 6 year old children as Mickey Mouse's silhouette. A study found that 91% of 6 year olds not only recognized the Old Joe image, but were able to correctly link him with cigarettes. This was the same recognition level measured for the Disney icon.
Tobacco companies can only argue that, to ban advertising would be an affront to the principles of American free enterprise, since the health risks of tobacco are no longer in dispute. This is a weak argument in view of the unique dangers of the product: All cigarettes contain carcinogens—whether there are few or many, they are still toxic. Cigarette smoke also contains more than 4,000 chemicals that are harmful to humans. Four million people will die from smoking this year, and create an enormous burden on our healthcare systems.
There really is no pro and con here....advertising tobacco should be banned.
ultragainz
New member
damn bro...thanks a lot...
solidspine
New member
Ironmaster-great photo,
ultragainz when is the Christmas break for students?
ultragainz when is the Christmas break for students?
ultragainz
New member
damn dont know...lol...i think there is 2-3 more weeks left for classes
Similar threads
- Locked
