cockdezl said:
This is a topic that is very emotion, instead of logic, driven.
If a man is smart, creative and ambitious, and produces something of great value to society, whereby he makes huge sums of money from it, he is naturally going to leave it to his children. Since his children are better off in the world than 95% of the population, they are going to have greater access to schooling and job potentials. This happens over generation after generation, and there are other families like this. Did they do anything immoral to attain the status that they exist in? If not, then why are so many hated as if they did do something illegal to gain their positions?
While there is no doubt that power corrupts, the world would not be as well off as it is without a Henry Ford, a Thomas Edison, a John Rockefeller. Historically, it has always been the inventiveness and drive of only a few people who alter mankind, yet they are despised by those who have done nothing but complain about their status in life.
I don't think 2Thick is complaining. The point is more that the efforts of the wealthy to stay there often involve legislative action that makes it even more difficult for the poorest to make progress.