Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

'Shocked and Horrified' by Larry Mosqueda, Ph.D.

velvett

Elite Mentor
Platinum
***DISCLAIMER***:
The views and statements written by Larry Mosqueda in his essay are not necessarily the thoughts shared by the person posting the copy of said text.
***END OF DISCLAIMER***




Like all Americans, on Tuesday, 9-11, I was shocked and horrified to watch the WTC Twin Towers attacked by hijacked planes and collapse, resulting in the deaths of perhaps up to 10,000 innocent people.

I had not been that shocked and horrified since January 16, 1991, when then President Bush attacked Baghdad, and the rest of Iraq and began killing 200,000 people during that "war" (slaughter). This includes the infamous "highway of death" in the last days of the slaughter when U.S. pilots literally shot in the back retreating Iraqi civilians and soldiers. I continue to be horrified by the sanctions on Iraq, which have resulted in the death of over 1,000,000 Iraqis, including over 500,000 children, about whom former Secretary of State Madeline Allbright has stated that their deaths "are worth the cost".

Over the course of my life I have been shocked and horrified by a variety of U.S. governmental actions, such as the U.S. sponsored coup against democracy in Guatemala in 1954 which resulted in the deaths of over 120,000 Guatemalan peasants by U.S. installed dictatorships over the course of four decades.

Last Tuesday's events reminded me of the horror I felt when the U.S. overthrew the governments of the Dominican Republic in 1965 and helped to murder 3,000 people. And it reminded me of the shock I felt in 1973, when the U.S. sponsored a coup in Chile against the democratic government of Salvador Allende and helped to murder another 30,000 people, including U.S. citizens.

Last Tuesday's events reminded me of the shock and horror I felt in 1965 when the U.S. sponsored a coup in Indonesia that resulted in the murder of over 800,000 people, and the subsequent slaughter in 1975 of over 250,000 innocent people in East Timor by the Indonesian regime with the direct complicity of President Ford and Secretary of State Henry Kissenger.

I was reminded of the shock and horror I felt during the U.S. sponsored terrorist contra war (the World Court declared the U.S. government a war criminal in 1984 for the mining of the harbors) against Nicaragua in the 1980s which resulted in the deaths of over 30,000 innocent people (or as the U.S. government used to call them before the term "collateral damage" was invented--"soft targets").

I was reminded of being horrified by the U. S. war against the people of El Salvador in the 1980s, which resulted in the brutal deaths of over 80,000 people, or "soft targets".

I was reminded of the shock and horror I felt during the U.S. sponsored terror war against the peoples of southern Africa (especially Angola) that began in the 1970's and continues to this day and has resulted in the deaths and mutilations of over 1,000,000. I was reminded of the shock and horror I felt as the U.S. invaded Panama over the Christmas season of 1989 and killed over 8,000 in an attempt to capture George H. Bush's CIA partner, now turned enemy, Manual Noriega.

I was reminded of the horror I felt when I learned about how the Shah of Iran was installed in a U.S. sponsored brutal coup that resulted in the deaths of over 70,000 Iranians from 1952-1979. And the continuing shock as I learned that the Ayatollah Khomani, who overthrew the Shah in 1979, and who was the U.S. public enemy for decade of the 1980s, was also on the CIA payroll, while he was in exile in Paris in the 1970s.

I was reminded of the shock and horror that I felt as I learned about how the U.S. has "manufactured consent" since 1948 for its support of Israel, to the exclusion of virtually any rights for the Palestinians in their native lands resulting in ever worsening day-to-day conditions for the people of Palestine. I was shocked as I learned about the hundreds of towns and villages that were literally wiped off the face of the earth in the early days of Israeli colonization. I was horrified in 1982 as the villagers of Sabra and Shatila were massacred by Israeli allies with direct Israeli complicity and direction. The untold thousands who died on that day match the scene of horror that we saw last Tuesday. But those scenes were not repeated over and over again on the national media to inflame the American public.

The events and images of last Tuesday have been appropriately compared to the horrific events and images of Lebanon in the 1980s with resulted in the deaths of tens of thousand of people, with no reference to the fact that the country that inflicted the terror on Lebanon was Israel, with U.S. backing. I still continue to be shocked at how mainstream commentators refer to "Israeli settlers" in the "occupied territories" with no sense of irony as they report on who are the aggressors in the region.

Of course, the largest and most shocking war crime of the second half of the 20th century was the U.S. assault on Indochina from 1954-1975, especially Vietnam, where over 4,000,000 people were bombed, napalmed, crushed, shot and individually "hands on" murdered in the "Phoenix Program" (this is where Oliver North got his start). Many U.S. Vietnam veterans were also victimized by this war and had the best of intentions, but the policy makers themselves knew the criminality of their actions and policies as revealed in their own words in "The Pentagon Papers," released by Daniel Ellsberg of the RAND Corporation. In 1974 Ellsberg noted that our Presidents from Truman to Nixon continually lied to the U.S. public about the purpose and conduct of the war. He has stated that, "It is a tribute to the American people that our leaders perceived that they had to lie to us, it is not a tribute to us that we were so easily misled."

I was continually shocked and horrified as the U.S. attacked and bombed with impunity the nation of Libya in the 1980s, including killing the infant daughter of Khadafi. I was shocked as the U.S. bombed and invaded Grenada in 1983. I was horrified by U.S. military and CIA actions in Somalia, Haiti, Afghanistan, Sudan, Brazil, Argentina, and Yugoslavia. The deaths in these actions ran into the hundreds of thousands.

The above list is by no means complete or comprehensive. It is merely a list that is easily accessible and not unknown, especially to the economic and intellectual elites. It has just been conveniently eliminated from the public discourse and public consciousness. And for the most part, the analysis that the U.S. actions have resulted in the deaths of primarily civilians (over 90%) is not unknown to these elites and policy makers. A conservative number for those who have been killed by U.S. terror and military action since World War II is 8,000,000 people. Repeat--8,000,000 people. This does not include the wounded, the imprisoned, the displaced, the refugees, etc. Martin Luther King, Jr. stated in 1967, during the Vietnam War, "My government is the world's leading purveyor of violence." Shocking and horrifying.

Nothing that I have written is meant to disparage or disrespect those who were victims and those who suffered death or the loss of a loved one during this week's events. It is not meant to "justify" any action by those who bombed the Twin Towers or the Pentagon. It is meant to put it in a context. If we believe that the actions were those of "madmen", they are "madmen" who are able to keep a secret for 2 years or more among over 100 people, as they trained to execute a complex plan. While not the acts of madmen, they are apparently the acts of "fanatics" who, depending on who they really are, can find real grievances, but whose actions are illegitimate.

Osama Bin Laden at this point has been accused by the media and the government of being the mastermind of Tuesday's bombings. Given the government's track record on lying to the America people, that should not be accepted as fact at this time. If indeed Bin Laden is the mastermind of this action, he is responsible for the deaths of perhaps 10,000 people-a shocking and horrible crime. Ed Herman in his book The Real Terror Network: Terrorism in Fact and Propaganda does not justify any terrorism but points out that states often engage in "wholesale" terror, while those whom governments define as "terrorist" engage in "retail" terrorism. While qualitatively the results are the same for the individual victims of terrorism, there is a clear quantitative difference. And as Herman and others point out, the seeds, the roots, of much of the "retail" terror are in fact found in the "wholesale" terror of states. Again this is not to justify, in any way, the actions of last Tuesday, but to put them in a context and suggest an explanation.

Perhaps most shocking and horrific, if indeed Bin Laden is the mastermind of Tuesday's actions; he has clearly had significant training in logistics, armaments, and military training, etc. by competent and expert military personnel. And indeed he has. During the 1980s, he was recruited, trained and funded by the CIA in Afghanistan to fight against the Russians. As long as he visited his terror on Russians and his enemies in Afghanistan, he was "our man" in that country.

The same is true of Saddam Hussein of Iraq, who was a CIA asset in Iraq during the 1980s. Hussein could gas his own people, repress the population, and invade his neighbor (Iran) as long as he did it with U.S. approval.

The same was true of Manuel Noriega of Panama, who was a contemporary and CIA partner of George H. Bush in the 1980s. Noriega's main crime for Bush, the father, was not that he dealt drugs (he did, but the U.S. and Bush knew this before 1989), but that Noriega was no longer going to cooperate in the ongoing U.S. terrorist contra war against Nicaragua.

This information is not unknown or really controversial among elite policy makers. To repeat, this not to justify any of the actions of last Tuesday, but to put it in its horrifying context.

As shocking as the events of last Tuesday were, they are likely to generate even more horrific actions by the U.S. government that will add significantly to the 8,000,000 figure stated above. This response may well be qualitatively and quantitatively worst than the events of Tuesday. The New York Times headline of 9/14/01 states that, "Bush and Top Aides Proclaim Policy Of Ending States That Back Terror" as if that was a rationale, measured, or even sane option. States that have been identified for possible elimination are "a number of Asian and African countries, like Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, and even Pakistan." This is beyond shocking and horrific-it is just as potentially suicidal, homicidal, and more insane than the hijackers themselves.

Also, qualitatively, these actions will be even worse than the original bombers if one accepts the mainstream premise that those involved are "madmen", "religious fanatics", or a "terrorist group." If so, they are acting as either individuals or as a small group. The U.S. actions may continue the homicidal policies of a few thousand elites for the past 50 years, involving both political parties.

The retail terror is that of desperate and sometime fanatical small groups and individuals who often have legitimate grievances, but engage in individual criminal and illegitimate activities; the wholesale terror is that of "rational" educated men where the pain, suffering, and deaths of millions of people are contemplated, planned, and too often, executed, for the purpose of furthering a nebulous concept called the "national interest". Space does not allow a full explanation of the elite's Orwellian concept of the "national interest", but it can be summarized as the protection and expansion of hegemony and an imperial empire.

The American public is being prepared for war while being fed a continuous stream of shocking and horrific repeated images of Tuesday's events and heartfelt stories from the survivors and the loved ones of those who lost family members. These stories are real and should not be diminished. In fact, those who lost family members can be considered a representative sample of humanity of the 8,000,000 who have been lost previously. If we multiply by 800-1000 times the amount of pain, angst, and anger being currently felt by the American public, we might begin to understand how much of the rest of the world feels as they are continually victimized.

Some particularly poignant images are the heart wrenching public stories that we are seeing and hearing of family members with pictures and flyers searching for their loved ones. These images are virtually the same as those of the "Mothers of the Disappeared" who searched for their (primarily) adult children in places such as Argentina, where over 11,000 were "disappeared" in 1976-1982, again with U.S. approval. Just as the mothers of Argentina deserved our respect and compassion, so do the relatives of those who are searching for their relatives now. However we should not allow ourselves to be manipulated by the media and U.S. government into turning real grief and anger into a national policy of wholesale terror and genocide against innocent civilians in Asia and Africa. What we are seeing in military terms is called "softening the target." The target here is the American public and we are being ideologically and emotionally prepared for the slaughter that may commence soon.

None of the previously identified Asian and African countries are democracies, which means that the people of these countries have virtually no impact on developing the policies of their governments, even if we assume that these governments are complicit in Tuesday's actions. When one examines the recent history of these countries, one will find that the American government had direct and indirect influences on creating the conditions for the existence of some of these governments. This is especially true of the Taliban government of Afghanistan itself.

The New York Metropolitan Area has about 21,000,000 people or about 8 % of the U.S. population. Almost everyone in America knows someone who has been killed, injured or traumatized by the events of Tuesday. I know that I do. Many people are calling for "revenge" or "vengeance" and comments such as "kill them all" have been circulated on the TV, radio, and email. A few more potentially benign comments have called for "justice." This is only potentially benign since that term may be defined by people such as Bush and Colin Powell. Powell is an unrepentant participant in the Vietnam War, the terrorist contra war against Nicaragua, and the Gulf war, at each level becoming more responsible for the planning and execution of the policies.

Those affected, all of us, must do everything in our power to prevent a wider war and even greater atrocity, do everything possible to stop the genocide if it starts, and hold those responsible for their potential war crimes during and after the war. If there is a great war in 2001 and it is not catastrophic (a real possibility), the crimes of that war will be revisited upon the U.S. over the next generation. That is not some kind of religious prophecy or threat, it is merely a straightforward political analysis. If indeed it is Bin Laden, the world must not deal only with him as an individual criminal, but eliminate the conditions that create the injustices and war crimes that will inevitably lead to more of these types of attacks in the future.

The phrase "No Justice, No Peace" is more than a slogan used in a march, it is an observable historical fact. It is time to end the horror.



'Shocked and Horrified'
by Larry Mosqueda, Ph.D. - The Evergreen State College
September 15, 2001



Talk amongst yourselves.
 
Uh oh, there you go posting the truth velvett. People don't want to read this kind of stuff, it makes things go from black and white to shades of gray. Our foreign policy has led to the deaths of many innocent civillians. And people wonder why some many people have problems with the US (not it's people but with it's policies).

This is a good essay, whether people want to believe it or not, it will at least make them think.

Now is the time for our country to eridacte terrorism and learn from our past mistakes.


Like I said, nobody wants to know the truth of what our government has done in the name of democracy.
 
all these threads are really making me wonder if Bin Laden is truly the enemy here (or "prime suspect" as GW likes to refer to him)...

or is he just the scape goat for the goverment to give the american public..so we have a face to hate?

i dunno...
 
I am always shocked and amazed at how the leftists are stuck in the past. This Ph.D which, by the way stands for Piled Higher and Deeper, is more of a pussy and afraid to stand up and fight putting his life on the line. He enjoys he freedom of speech (tripe that it is) due to the actions of the US. He is an insult to those who have died, he has belittled their death, and the death of those Americans soldiers, Marines, etc that have fought and died or been injured for this country.

Hope, the war doesn't start up over here, cause I will have a hard time defending the likes of him.
 
The Nature Boy said:
Uh oh, there you go posting the truth velvett. People don't want to read this kind of stuff, it makes things go from black and white to shades of gray. Our foreign policy has led to the deaths of many innocent civillians. And people wonder why some many people have problems with the US (not it's people but with it's policies).

This is a good essay, whether people want to believe it or not, it will at least make them think.

Now is the time for our country to eridacte terrorism and learn from our past mistakes.


Like I said, nobody wants to know the truth of what our government has done in the name of democracy.

Exactly.
 
Kakdiesel said:
all these threads are really making me wonder if Bin Laden is truly the enemy here (or "prime suspect" as GW likes to refer to him)...

or is he just the scape goat for the goverment to give the american public..so we have a face to hate?

i dunno...

Funny how Bin Laden was the "prime suspect" MINUTES after the attacks. You're not gonna have Bush go on-air and say "You know, this really sucked ass and we have absolutely no fucking clue who did it. Thanks and have a good one."
 
Kakdiesel said:
all these threads are really making me wonder if Bin Laden is truly the enemy here (or "prime suspect" as GW likes to refer to him)...

or is he just the scape goat for the goverment to give the american public..so we have a face to hate?

i dunno...

Doubting America? That's what Leftist Propaganda is supposed to make you do.

P.S. to chesty - Right on, bruvva!!
 
chesty said:
I am always shocked and amazed at how the leftists are stuck in the past. This Ph.D which, by the way stands for Piled Higher and Deeper, is more of a pussy and afraid to stand up and fight putting his life on the line. He enjoys he freedom of speech (tripe that it is) due to the actions of the US. He is an insult to those who have died, he has belittled their death, and the death of those Americans soldiers, Marines, etc that have fought and died or been injured for this country.

Hope, the war doesn't start up over here, cause I will have a hard time defending the likes of him.

Stuck in the past? What's your point? WTC and the pentagon were in the past. Should we forget that? No!

Why would you have a hard time defending him? BECAUSE HE SPEAKS THE TRUTH? Can you disprove what he wrote? Please do.
 
Velvett,

Good post.

But before anyone gets on any bandwagons, I have a few questions for Americans out there:

How many of you think the government should not act in its own best interest?

How much of this is offset in the cosmic sense by the billions and billions that the US dispenses in foreign aid each year? How about all of the technological breakthroughs we share with the world?

How many of you are willing to give up your standard of living so that the US can be considered a paragon of virtue?

How many of you honestly and truly give a shit about any of those events?
 
Weapon X said:


Doubting America? That's what Leftist Propaganda is supposed to make you do.

P.S. to chesty - Right on, bruvva!!

Doubting america? To question why things are and how they are being presented is not doubting america.

Personally I think Bin Ladden did it. But I have about as much proof as anyone else.

I ask you X, is the stuff written in the essay above true or untrue? And how is it doubting america?
 
What truth does he speak? Jane Fonda spoke the truth when she turned over to the captors of American military personel a note handed to them by them to be carried home to let their families know they were alive. Instead she handed the note over which resutled in the death of some of them.

Yes, the wtc is in the recent past.

Why is it hard to believe that we do what is best for us? Do you not do the same?
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
Velvett,

Good post.

But before anyone gets on any bandwagons, I have a few questions for Americans out there:

How many of you think the government should not act in its own best interest?

How much of this is offset in the cosmic sense by the billions and billions that the US dispenses in foreign aid each year? How about all of the technological breakthroughs we share with the world?

How many of you are willing to give up your standard of living so that the US can be considered a paragon of virtue?

How many of you honestly and truly give a shit about any of those events?

Governments are supposed to act on it's own interests. But to kill thousands or millions either directly or indirectly to meet it's interests is insane and wrong. We're all humans right?

Does giving out money to governments make up for all the stuff written above make everything ok? What do you think? And I can name a number of governments that we give aid to that are corrupt and un-democratic and violently opress their own people. And we give Cuba shit for not having elections. Please.

Look, I love america, and I'll die for her, but I'll be damned if I'm not going to criticize crimes that have been commited in the past, because if we forget the past, we are doomed to repeat it.
 
TNB,

Good answer.
 
chesty said:
What truth does he speak? Jane Fonda spoke the truth when she turned over to the captors of American military personel a note handed to them by them to be carried home to let their families know they were alive. Instead she handed the note over which resutled in the death of some of them.

Yes, the wtc is in the recent past.

Why is it hard to believe that we do what is best for us? Do you not do the same?

Jane Fonda? WTF?

Please disprove any of the point that this PhD..err...Piled Higer and Deeper .. made (what was your education again?). He just listed a bunch of facts. The US isnt as innocent in international murders as you believe. There is a reason why terrorism exists, and it isnt because they're jealous of the US. Only American think the rest of the world is jealous of them.
 
chesty said:
What truth does he speak? Jane Fonda spoke the truth when she turned over to the captors of American military personel a note handed to them by them to be carried home to let their families know they were alive. Instead she handed the note over which resutled in the death of some of them.

Yes, the wtc is in the recent past.

Why is it hard to believe that we do what is best for us? Do you not do the same?

Please clarify what you mean in your first paragraph. I don't see how the two coorelate.

As for doing the best for myself, you're damn right I'm going to do that. But am I going to step on and kill innocent people to get my way? No way.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
TNB,

Good answer.

Matt, while I don't always agree with what you say, your opinons are solid and IMO you are one of the most objective persons on this board.

Isn't it fucking great that we live in a society where we can debate this kind of stuff. In some other countries we'd be shot for this.

GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!!!!!! (even thought I don't think I beleive in GOD.... but you get the point).
 
It seems that this board (along with most of humanity) judges the quality of "THE TRUTH" on a continuum, which is directly correlated to how much "THE TRUTH" corresponds to the individual's personal beliefs. In other words, if the facts do not agree with your viewpoints, then they must be flawed.

This is the type of behavior that reinforces Rousseau’s view of humanity (as inherently evil). Note that Rousseau did not add any theological connotation to his theory.
 
TNB,

Yeah it is pretty cool. Hey the Dept. of Defense invented the Internet!!

US foreign policy hasn't exactly been perfect, or even close to it. A lot of people are dead because of what we did. I just hate to see when people come out with "This was only payback for decades of US abuse" when they

1. Had no interest in any of those events before

2. Likely could not find too many of those places on the map (East Timor, Afghanistan prior to 9/11)



American citiziens should be EVER VIGILANT of foreign policy, lest it become our domestic policy, instead of getting fired up only in times of great drama.
 
freshr1 said:


Funny how Bin Laden was the "prime suspect" MINUTES after the attacks. You're not gonna have Bush go on-air and say "You know, this really sucked ass and we have absolutely no fucking clue who did it. Thanks and have a good one."

Yup...I agree...does it mean I don't think he was at least partially responsible, no, but it does make me wonder...this type of superquick proclaiming of guilt has happened in this same fashion in the past, Oswald, etc..


What are you talking about Chesty? Leftists stuck in the past?
A person thinking with his brain and not his emotions would seek to find out what drove these people to commit this act, because we can kill and kill and kill...but if we continue to let our govt. and corporations run roughshed over these 3rd world countries...we are going to continue having people who hate us so badly, they are willing to die to kill some of our citizens. I have of course simplified the whole issue greatly here, there are plenty of other reasons why we were attacked I'm sure, but I hope this country becomes more aware of it's foreign policy and not so blindly patriotic.
 
MattTheSkywalker said:
TNB,

Yeah it is pretty cool. Hey the Dept. of Defense invented the Internet!!

US foreign policy hasn't exactly been perfect, or even close to it. A lot of people are dead because of what we did. I just hate to see when people come out with "This was only payback for decades of US abuse" when they

1. Had no interest in any of those events before

2. Likely could not find too many of those places on the map (East Timor, Afghanistan prior to 9/11)



American citiziens should be EVER VIGILANT of foreign policy, lest it become our domestic policy, instead of getting fired up only in times of great drama.

Bump on that bro!

I think after this whole mess our foreign policy is going to change for the betterment of mankind. Don't get me wrong, we will always have enemies, but I hope soon we will have more allies to fight these enemies. The US will be like the Superfriends!!!! Ok I'm getting too carried away, sorry.
 
I would like to note that I do agree Matt with what you say...I truly don't think we benefit as much as you are implying from our foreign policy, and by we, I am talking about the middle/poor/upper middle classes....Like I said before, does Nike pass it's slave-labor wages benefits on to the consumer here? Fuck no, they charge exorberant <sp> amounts for their products...and yes, that's capitalism, but you get my point.

Also, I personally, WAS aware and DO and DID care about these US sponsored slaughters long before this happened, and I'm only 19.

What am I suggesting as a solution? Perfect foreign policy? Of course not.

I am suggesting that the majority of America WAKE THE FUCK UP, and at least be more aware...I am so dissapointed with my generation especially...I have talked to about 6 people around my age in the last 2 weeks, and only ONE knew who the vice president was...it's fucking pathetic.
 
What are the ages of most people in this thread?? You have to be very young like under 25. Its unreal to hear Americans on the street being patriotic then hear young kids just out of liberal brainwashing facilities wimper about how evil the US is......... well love it or leave it children, if you agree with the PH.D that wrote this then please move to freedom loving countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and stop spreading your liberal guilt about how evil the US is..................should I refute what this jackass said?? I could but it would take a ton of research. And what would it prove?? There would still be liberal crying about how evil the US is.

Oh yea 200,000 Iraqi's killed in the gulf war??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.............. the highest estimate I've seen is 100,000 and that is probably way high. And about all the children who died fter the gulf war??? Uh don;t you think you should blame the DICTATOR who did it?? NOOOOOOOOOOO its the evil USA!!!!!

Aren't there any real americans here?? Chesty..............but who else??
 
chesty said:
I am always shocked and amazed at how the leftists are stuck in the past. This Ph.D which, by the way stands for Piled Higher and Deeper, is more of a pussy and afraid to stand up and fight putting his life on the line. He enjoys he freedom of speech (tripe that it is) due to the actions of the US. He is an insult to those who have died, he has belittled their death, and the death of those Americans soldiers, Marines, etc that have fought and died or been injured for this country.

Hope, the war doesn't start up over here, cause I will have a hard time defending the likes of him.

DAMN SKIPPY.
 
velvett said:

From your web page you listed America hater..............

How many Iraqis died?

Independent analysts generally agree the Iraqi death toll was well below initial post-war estimates. In the immediate aftermath of the war, these estimates ranged as high as 100,000 Iraqi troops killed and 300,000 wounded


HMMM just what I said.................alot less than the PH.D commie
Notice they say "as high as" meaning there were probably alot less
 
talonracer said:


From your web page you listed America hater..............

How many Iraqis died?

Independent analysts generally agree the Iraqi death toll was well below initial post-war estimates. In the immediate aftermath of the war, these estimates ranged as high as 100,000 Iraqi troops killed and 300,000 wounded


HMMM just what I said.................alot less than the PH.D commie
Notice they say "as high as" meaning there were probably alot less


America HATER? Read the disclaimer.

That web site is from PBS - An American Station

I understood it from other documents that it is to be 200,000 Iraqi and 160,000 American soilders either dead or infected - as well as their offspring.

I'm not dissing America.

American government happens to be very good with their strategies and you have to play both sides of the fence to win the battle. Gotta give some, loose some to make you way to the top.
 
Last edited:
talonracer said:
What are the ages of most people in this thread?? You have to be very young like under 25. Its unreal to hear Americans on the street being patriotic then hear young kids just out of liberal brainwashing facilities wimper about how evil the US is......... well love it or leave it children, if you agree with the PH.D that wrote this then please move to freedom loving countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and stop spreading your liberal guilt about how evil the US is..................should I refute what this jackass said?? I could but it would take a ton of research. And what would it prove?? There would still be liberal crying about how evil the US is.

Aren't there any real americans here?? Chesty..............but who else??


What the fuck is this garbage? Love it or leave it? What happened to, if you're not satisfied with it, you try to change it?

What makes you think that just because I strongly disagree with a lot that my country does that I am not a patriot?

Brainwashing? Which one of us is thinking for ourselves, and which one is blind here? I'll give you a hint...it's not me.

I'm not a victim of any liberal brainwashing...for one thing, I'm not a liberal, nor am I a conservative..I'm somone who bases their opinons on a case-by-case basis rather than a party line follower.
 
Frackal said:

I'm not a victim of any liberal brainwashing...for one thing, I'm not a liberal, nor am I a conservative..I'm somone who bases their opinons on a case-by-case basis rather than a party line follower.

LOL well I'm neither a repulican or democrat. I'm fiscally consevative but very liberal socially..........so maybe I'm a liberatarian who knows??

So how old ARE you??? My point was you read drivel like that guy wrote and blindly accept it.............well why not do this....RESEARCH what he was talking about. First off alot of this shit happened during our war against communism..........hell we had segregation in the 50's. Guess what?? The world changes.
Do i agree with everything my governments does?? Fuck no!!! But do I blindly take some PH.D's word for shit?? Hell anyone can take an event triple the amount of people killed then blame the US. I mean some of the stuff he says is like saying, "The US was responsible for killing hundreds of thousands of Germans from the early 1900's to the middle 1900's..............I mean JEEEEZ how gullable are you people?? I can take any event in history and inflate death totals then make it seem like its someone's fault. So where are this guy's referances??? I read that stupid drivel then surfed the 'net a bit.......lo and behold he either didn't tell the whole story or stretched the truth...........yet you sit here and say you see things from both sides. Well then why don't you start now??
Its just sick this country is coming together like I've never seen im my lifetime,yet there are always wet blankets who gripe and complain about this country even NOW. Yea pull up shit that happened 50 years ago to tell us why we should hate America today................or tell us how evil we were for Standing up to Saddam Hussein............... unreal
 
So that essay is false? Tomorrow I'll find you facts that prove IT ALL TO BE TRUE, if you like.

As for the war in Iraq, THAT's WHY I JOINED THE MILITARY PAL so don't go tell me to leave my country! I'm a fucking voter, a taxpayer and a gun owner, you don't like it YOU LEAVE!

Yes we were at war when we slaughtered all those people (civ's and military) retreating, and war is war, shit like that happens. But the people need to know that it happend out there, and while we showed cool videos of buildings getting blown up and shit we need to see the human face of war which is not pretty.

As for the war on Communism, that was a fight we needed to win. But at what cost to the innocent pawns in all of this. We overthrew Allande in Chile, so we could put Pinochet in power, that SOB killed thousands of his people and he even killed americans too. Read up on Kissenger and you'll see what I mean.

All I was trying to say is that OUR country needs to learn from it's mistakes and not repeat them.
 
You may have missed my point. I mention Jane Fonda (about as leftist as you can get) who did everything in her power to prove our war against North Vietnam was wrong. Even to the extent of getting our military men killed. This article by the driviling pussy, is stating that our gov't did something similar by furthering our its cause (our cause) but in that case it is evil.

Our gov't has made its share of mistakes, we have helped people and country's in the past that have turned out to become our enemy's in the future.

My education. I have a BS in Aerospace engineering, Minors in Math and physics, half done with a master's in physics as well.

I am a Marine, and a taxpayer. People like the youngsters on this board and the sniveling Jane Fondas, do not understand that the only reason they live the way they do is because of what our gov't has done and will do. And while they claim to disagree with our gov't tactics, they readily enjoy all of the benifits of them.

Would you be willing to no longer be able to drive, fly, watch tv, own a house, have a job, get and education, worship freely, disagree with your leaders without fear of execution, have a fine young lady and be able to show her off to the rest of the world, wear whatever clothes you want, play video games, go on dates, etc.

I think you get my point. People like our Ph.D dude from above our responible for more crap and trouble in the world then anything else. Yes, you and others like you, remain in the past, espousing those ideas as current and valid. If you truly think for yourself, then ask yourself this:

"Can I do without and will I do without all that has been given to me by those who came before me and died so that I may have and enjoy what I now do, because I believe my gov't to be wrong and murderous?"

In war you will always have innocent casualties. But I believe we have done a good job lately of minimizing those.

As for wasting the retreating Iraqi's, Just as Gen Schwarzkopf said, they were taking their equipment with them, which left them with the capability to continue to wage war. We could not allow them to do that.

Just like Netinahu (Israel former leader) said to us about this, stop the legalisms, you have been attacked, this a war, and you must treat it as such. You cannot arrest and hold trial with the perpatrators of this act of war. You must defend yourself and fight this war, because they will be fighting it if you don't. Or something close to that.

Okay, I am hungry gotta go eat a beef burger with some greasy fries and a diet coke.

Long live America.
 
Last edited:
Governments have and will always do what is
in their best interests.

It would be great if everything was black and white.
But that is not the way it is in real life. Sometimes
you have to choose the lesser of two evils.

Also remember what looks like the right thing to
do today, might turn out to actually have been the
wrong thing to do, when you look back in 10 or 15
years.
It's like they say: Hindsight is 20/20.
 
chesty said:
You may have missed my point. I mention Jane Fonda (about as leftist as you can get) who did everything in her power to prove our war against North Vietnam was wrong. Even to the extent of getting our military men killed. This article by the driviling pussy, is stating that our gov't did something similar by furthering our its cause (our cause) but in that case it is evil.

Our gov't has made its share of mistakes, we have helped people and country's in the past that have turned out to become our enemy's in the future.

My education. I have a BS in Aerospace engineering, Minors in Math and physics, half done with a master's in physics as well.

I am a Marine, and a taxpayer. People like the youngsters on this board and the sniveling Jane Fondas, do not understand that the only reason they live the way they do is because of what our gov't has done and will do. And while they claim to disagree with our gov't tactics, they readily enjoy all of the benifits of them.

Would you be willing to no longer be able to drive, fly, watch tv, own a house, have a job, get and education, worship freely, disagree with your leaders without fear of execution, have a fine young lady and be able to show her off to the rest of the world, where whatever clothes you want, play video games, go on dates, etc.

I think you get my point. People like our Ph.D dude from above our responible for more crap and trouble in the world then anything else. Yes, you and others like you, remain in the past, espousing those ideas as current and valid. If you truly think for yourself, then ask yourself this:

"Can I do without and will I do without all that has been given to me by those who came before me and died so that I may have and enjoy what I now do, because I believe my gov't to be wrong and murderous?"

In war you will always have innocent casualties. But I believe we have done a good job lately of minimizing those.

As for wasting the retreating Iraqi's, Just as Gen Schwarzkopf said, they were taking their equipment with them, which left them with the capability to continue to wage war. We could not allow them to do that.

Just like Netinahu (Israel former leader) said to us about this, stop the legalisms, you have been attacked, this a war, and you must treat it as such. You cannot arrest and hold trial with the perpatrators of this act of war. You must defend yourself and fight this war, because they will be fighting it if you don't. Or something close to that.


Long live America.

5th paragraph, do we need to be so murderous in the future from now on to have our luxuries we hold so dear? Do we need to install people who kill their own people so we can have 1000 TV channels? I think we can do a better job and be more righteous with our foreigh policy. We need to be an example of what every country should strive for, a democracy that is moral and just. I think there is a better way then just accepting the staus quo.

Sept 11 has shown us that the world has become smaller. Events across the globe can be felt here. We must start working with our neighbors (aka the world) and become a model for other countries to follow, and assist them to that goal. We spend billions of dollars "helping" other countries, to me it doesn't seem like it's helping. Because the aid we gives goes to corrupt or opressive leaders who should not be in power in the first place (And that is current history chesty). Why don't we at least keep the money here in the states then give it to murders and crooks.

As for the war in Iraq, like I said I agree with everything that happened, that's why I went into the army. I'm just saying everone needs to know what happened down there and be AWARE of what is going on now.

Long Live America.
 
Did I just see the inevitable Chesty brag about his own education and then diss someone else for having a PhD? Typical. In an ethos that values power and size, naturally he´d have to diss someone with a bigger degree.

Thanks for posting the essay, Velvett. While the average American´s ignorance is forgivable, I find the willful stupidity of the American media, its refusal to look at the bigger picture, to educate people about the context here, unforgivable.

If you applied the logic of George Bush and his chest-thumping supporters to America itself, you´d have a great case for why CHile, for one example of many, should have bombed the US "back to the stone age." We have harbored more terrorists and aided more terrorism than any country on the planet.

When Bush says this is a "new war," what he means is that it´s new for the US to experience this kind of loss. This "war" has been conducted in continual bombing of the MIddle East by America for 10 years.

All of us are grief-stricken and angry, and the bombs-away mentality is an effective SHORT-TERM way of avoiding questions none of us want to ask about America's position in the world. Go ahead and have your moment of revenge on Afghanistan but rest assured that a jihad of suicidal fanatics with money to move all over the globe and strike without any motive but to terrorize won´t be the least bit deterred. It will, in fact, be fed, because its only reason for existing is revenge, rational or not.
 
big4life said:
Governments have and will always do what is
in their best interests.

It would be great if everything was black and white.
But that is not the way it is in real life. Sometimes
you have to choose the lesser of two evils.

Also remember what looks like the right thing to
do today, might turn out to actually have been the
wrong thing to do, when you look back in 10 or 15
years.
It's like they say: Hindsight is 20/20.

Yes I agree with what you say. Some of our actions were unintentional, but some were on purpose (Chile, Kissenger knew what he was doing there).

All I'm saying is that we have the resources and people to start trying to figure out the LONG TERM implications of our current policies. Is that too much to ask? I think not for the greatest country in the world.
 
chesty said:
I am always shocked and amazed at how the leftists are stuck in the past. This Ph.D which, by the way stands for Piled Higher and Deeper, is more of a pussy and afraid to stand up and fight putting his life on the line. He enjoys he freedom of speech (tripe that it is) due to the actions of the US. He is an insult to those who have died, he has belittled their death, and the death of those Americans soldiers, Marines, etc that have fought and died or been injured for this country.

Hope, the war doesn't start up over here, cause I will have a hard time defending the likes of him.

Well Chesty, logically speaking he's right on the money.

Godspeed
 
chesty said:
I am always shocked and amazed at how the leftists are stuck in the past. This Ph.D which, by the way stands for Piled Higher and Deeper, is more of a pussy and afraid to stand up and fight putting his life on the line. He enjoys he freedom of speech (tripe that it is) due to the actions of the US. He is an insult to those who have died, he has belittled their death, and the death of those Americans soldiers, Marines, etc that have fought and died or been injured for this country.

Hope, the war doesn't start up over here, cause I will have a hard time defending the likes of him.

Well Chesty, logically speaking he's right on the money.

Godspeed
 
this peace is at least a cry to get his name in the paper and at most is just a page with historical dates. there is always two sides to every story, this essay list niether. he should just move!
 
Most disturbing

Was working out the gym the other day and caught a few minutes of a news program where they were interviewing a U.S. diplomat to the Middle East. I did not catch his name as I came in the middle of the program.

One of the interviewers asked how something like the WTC bombing could happen. The ambassador started a reply about the US bombings of 5 or 6 Middle Eastern countries in the last 10 years and the afffects on civilian populations.

Before he could get far in to his explanation, the interviewer interrupted him, curtly thanks him then cut the ambassador off.

According to many conservative respondents, it is unAmerican to open your eyes. Looking at the world from another's viewpoint or getting all your facts is unpatriotic. How sad for you puppets.

FYI, I served my country honorably during the Viet Nam conflict and my views about America forever changed because of the lies I saw firsthand being fed to the American public.

Freedom of Speech is not "tripe" as one poster put it.
 
Logicallly speaking no I don't think he is right. We did not order nor direct the killing of innocent civilians and had we known that the side we chose would turn on us or sour, we would not have made that choice. Sometimes we have to chose the lesser of two evils, jsut as has been stated by many when voting.

It is like the missile defense system. The rest of world doesn't want us to do it. Why? Because then we would be able to defend ourselves that much better, thus ensuring our survivability in the event of the big one. Plus, it makes it harder for our enemies to get at us through the air.

We do things to ensure our survival, right wrong or indifferent. While we do not need to kill every innocent around us to obtain our goal. We cannot ignore the fact that people and country's will always hate us for who we are.

Of course I poked fun at him. It goes like this.

BS = Bullshit
MS = More shit
Ph.D = Piled higher and deeper.

lighten up.
 
TNB, i didnt say it wasnt true although i will research the numbers because its hard to get factual numbers in these situations. i said it had no substance it just tells you the dates and numbers. it doesnt tell you why these events happened. there is always two sides to every story and he tells niether.
 
The reason why we did these things was to prevent the spead of communism. But do the ends justify the means? By aiding in crimes agains humanity we've sunk to their level.

I'm no commie lover, all I'm saying WE CAN LEARN FROM OUR MISTAKES and think our policies logically. The past is the past, we can't change that. We claim to support democracy yet we have backed murderers and thugs.... WE NEED TO WALK IT LIKE WE TALK IT from now on.
 
TNB,
hindsight is always 20/20. at the time "some" of our domestic polycies and or conflicts may have seemed to be in our best interest. these issues are dynamic, nonthing is static. its very easy to make judgement after the fact instead of making the decisions. but im also with you and other people on here, this govt. has done wrong, but there not alone in that respect, and thats where the other side of the story comes into play.
 
Top Bottom