Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Seven Year old Paul Pearson - Please read

T

toille1

New member
On August 14th 1991 seven year old Paul Pearson vanished as he cycled home after playing with a friend in Saltburn. A local man, Richard Blenkey, lured Paul into his chicken hut on his allotment and stripped and sexually assaulted him. He then beat Paul about the face and strangled him with gardening thread. The bike and Paul’s naked body were found the next day in an overgrown 50ft ravine. Blenkey was sentenced to life, and was ordered to serve at least, a minimum of 20 years.

19 years on, Blenkey has applied to be transferred to an open prison, where he will then wait whether he will be released. Please support the Pearson family to ensure that the Blenkey is not able to commit further crimes and to ensure that he is never able to harm another child and another family.

Please show your support at paulpearson.org.uk - please follow the link and leave a comment. The Parole board will consider public comments on the Paul Pearson website when making their decision

I appreciate that this is my first post on this forum, the reason for this is that we have had a great deal of support from other forums and hope that your members can also help the cause by showing your support which could be vital in the decision made by the parole board.

This is a very serious issue and not spam - I understand why forum users may initially think it is, if so then please take the time to visit the site and review the news articles, family statements, public support and make your own decisions.

Please feel free to pass this link onto friends and family via facebook, twitter, email and other forums if you feel they would also support the cause.
Thank you - toille1, family friend
 
listen bro, this is spam.

i'm sorry and everything, but this has nothing to do with fitness.
 
Also Im sure public comments will NOT affect, how can a hiugher legal entity really care about random stranger's postings?
 
superdave said:
its still spam, maybe good intentioned but spam nonetheless.
Click to expand...

I apologise if you feel that way - I looked in the forum listings and placed it in the forum entitled "A forum for all non-bodybuilding talk!" to try and prevent any such feelings.
 
nangiggles said:
Also Im sure public comments will NOT affect, how can a hiugher legal entity really care about random stranger's postings?
Click to expand...

i would have felt exactly the same in your position, however the Pearson's have been advised that comments left on a .org site will be taken into account, so they have set one up. I guess in their position the majority of people would do the same, and try and get public support in any way they could.
 
toille1 said:
I apologise if you feel that way - I looked in the forum listings and placed it in the forum entitled "A forum for all non-bodybuilding talk!" to try and prevent any such feelings.
Click to expand...

The fact doesnt matter that its posted in a non-bodybuilding forum. Its still spam because it promotes a website or product without being a paid sponsor of elitefitness.com
 
OK superdave. My intention was not to upset anyone nor promote a product but to help friends of mine gain support with what I feel is a worthy cause.

I have looked for a remove thread option and cannot find one. If you feel strongly enough that this thread should be removed then I cannot argue with you reporting it to the moderators.
 
I dont feel strongly about it one way or the other, I am simply pointing out to you that it is in fact spam. Maybe the mods will let it stay, who knows
 
if the mods want it gone, it'll go

I checked out the info online by googling it...this story is everywhere
 
I thought this was gonna be some crazy thread about some eastern european 7 year old being pumpued full of roids! lol admittantly this has nothing to do with that
 
ok, tell you what.
this IS spam, even though it's well intentioned and for a good cause.
i'll leave this thread up here and ask that you not make any more on this topic.
 
toille1 said:
The Parole board will consider public comments on the Paul Pearson website when making their decision
Click to expand...

I lol'ed.

If the severity & nature of his crime wasn't sufficient reason alone to have the bloke banged up indefinitely without right to parole period then what good will the website do?

UK government; tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime :rolleyes:
 
Well if he has served 19 of 20 years he did his time, they cant just decide to lock him up again, regardless of how heinous the crime was...
 
stosstruppe said:
Depends if you believe paedophilia to be inate like hetero / homosexuality & subsequently immune to "rehabilitation".
Click to expand...

even if it's innate, i think you can still teach people to suppress their urges and function well in society. or maybe he can learn to only rape bad children who steal lunch money and give swirlies, like in dexter.
 
nangiggles said:
Well if he has served 19 of 20 years he did his time, they cant just decide to lock him up again, regardless of how heinous the crime was...
Click to expand...

if it was my kid, i would have whacked his perverted ass and saved the taxpayers a bunch of money...if i had failed, i would be welcoming his release so i could have another crack at him...and, i'd make sure i didn't fail this time.
 
WTF is wrong with you people? There should be no second chance for this man, that little kid didnt even get a fair shot at life. This guy needs the death penalty - what kind of a human rapes and kills a child? I couldnt IMAGINE a man like that being able to be released into society. Did you guys skim past the part where he killed the kid?
 
nimbus said:
i'm not convinced that most people have the education or wisdom to be given authority over what this person "needs" or "deserves"

of course everyone is entitled to their opinion, but i hope the judiciary doesn't actually take that website into consideration
Click to expand...

really bor? rape and murder a child and get out in 19 years? I dont think so.
 
superdave said:
really bor? rape and murder a child and get out in 19 years? I dont think so.
Click to expand...

i duno man. i like to think that the people who write and interpret law know what they're doing.

who's to say what someone "deserves".. criminal justice should serve a purpose other than satisfying emotions

if more time would serve as more a deterrent in the future, then i can see why one would want his sentence to be stiffer

but if not, why be spiteful towards someone who is possibly ready to make a good contribution to society
 
nimbus said:
i duno man. i like to think that the people who write and interpret law know what they're doing.

who's to say what someone "deserves".. criminal justice should serve a purpose other than satisfying emotions

if more time would serve as more a deterrent in the future, then i can see why one would want his sentence to be stiffer

but if not, why be spiteful towards someone who is possibly ready to make a good contribution to society
Click to expand...

iotta red you for this :evil: lol

but seriously, what about the justice for the child and family?
 
nimbus said:
i duno man. i like to think that the people who write and interpret law know what they're doing.

who's to say what someone "deserves".. criminal justice should serve a purpose other than satisfying emotions

if more time would serve as more a deterrent in the future, then i can see why one would want his sentence to be stiffer

but if not, why be spiteful towards someone who is possibly ready to make a good contribution to society
Click to expand...

Its not about whether or not he can make a good contribution to society. its about meting out appropriate punishment. im sure youve heard of a million inmates who suddenly found jesus once they were in the pin, doesnt mean they are ready to contribute to society when they are out but thats beside the point still. the purpose of a jail sentence is delivering punishment. if the punishment for the rape and murder of a child is only 19 years thats a huge problem because it essentially sets an upper limit precedent of what a someone can be sentenced for murder of anyone. Because if someone can get away with 19 years for raping and murdering a child, what should someone get sentenced for if they "only" murder an adult? 10 years? 7? You have to think of these things. Its not as overcomplicated so as only people in black robes with a lot of letters after their name can only ponder. If we have life sentences and death penalties available for certain crimes, I cant think of any crime more worthy of either than the rape and murder of a child. That and serial killers.
 
nimbus said:
that's what civil court is for
Click to expand...

nonsense. even if the parents won a civil judgment its not enforceable, the plaintiff has to somehow go after it and get it themselves. Remember OJ and all the trouble Ron Goldman had to go through to get any money at all? I guarantee if the parents had to choose between getting whatever little money the guy has and putting him away for life, or death penalty they will gladly choose the later every time, and it will be just.
 
nimbus said:
...why be spiteful towards someone who is possibly ready to make a good contribution to society
Click to expand...

Considering there are over 6.5 billion people on this planet, and a good percentage of these, probably, want to leave a good legacy for humankind...well, this guy can curl up and die already.
 
i don't believe in punishment for punishment's sake. i don't think someone deserves to suffer just because they did something bad.

i think our penal code should serve two purposes:
to deter future crime, and to keep people who are going to commit repeat offenses away from society

if two decades is no more of a deterrent than five, and the parole board has reason to be convinced that he won't commit those crimes or similar ones, i don't see why he should have to keep being punished out of spite.


i feel horrible for the victims, i really do. but making the guilty suffer for the sole sake of suffering is not the best thing for humanity in my opinion
 
i would rather see 50 welfare lifers who won't do anything but eat and watch tv die than a reformed killer who is going to be productive with his life
 
Im sure that does opposed to his release think that a suitful punishment is death, an eye for an eye :you take my boy I take your life" what is the point of this? there is a reason it is called a CORRECTIONAL facility, the purpose of incarceration is to rehabilitate people, granted this is rarely the case, but if this person regrets their behaviour and did their time and will be productive to society without harming others I see NO good reason to keep him in, you cant just lock him up because he "might" do something bad, it's not fair and yes I know it's not fair what happened to the little boy but judicial system doesnt work like that....
 
I completely disagree. Usually another life has to be lost until someone is locked away for life. It shouldnt be that way, that is NOT justice. When another child dies, is that enough? When it comes to our children, we should protect them, not the criminals. What kind of society cant even protect children from people who have killed them before? Lets just hope a man like this does not move into your neighborhood and near your schools when you have children. In my eyes, you kill one child, you dont GET another chance. Drug offenders, yes..child rapist/murderers..NO. But whatever - we dont all have to agree. I just really really dont agree with that mindset. That is all. (lol) I find it unimaginable to take a garden hose and wrap it around a childs neck and watch him die and dump his dead naked body in a ravine. Can someone like that be rehabilitated?

Just three weeks ago a child was abducted from a repeat child molester who had JUST been released. What about that girl that was killed while she was jogging by a repeat offender? Those kids didnt have to die.

Probably cuz I have a kid. Couldnt imagine someone doing that, that wasnt so messed up...
 
You have got to be shitting me in thinking that this "person" has been or can be rehabilitated..

HELLO, he raped and killed a little boy. Then served 19 years in jail with other men...What rehabilitation tactics were used on him? All he did was learn more about man sex! Not to be an ass here, just thinking that unless this man had a major breakthrough than there is no such thing as rehabilitation.

Let's not forget he stole an innocent child's innocence and LIFE. He murdered someone...Those type of people are unable to be rehabilitated and entered back into society, especially given the fact that he has been locked up for so long, how the fuck does he even know about society at this point????????????

Death penalty would work in my opinion. Rid the world of his scum!
 
nimbus said:
i don't believe in punishment for punishment's sake. i don't think someone deserves to suffer just because they did something bad.
Click to expand...
Agree to disagree on this philosophy.

nimbus said:
i think our penal code should serve two purposes:
to deter future crime, and to keep people who are going to commit repeat offenses away from society
Click to expand...
Harsh sentences deter future crimes bor, thats why a state like Texas (high ass death penalty rate) have less severe crime problems than others

nimbus said:
if two decades is no more of a deterrent than five, and the parole board has reason to be convinced that he won't commit those crimes or similar ones, i don't see why he should have to keep being punished out of spite.
Click to expand...
The recidivism rate for prisoners released from prison within one year is 44.1%; this number rises to 67.5% within three years of being released from prison. Sixty-seven percent of the people who were rearrested were charged with 750,000 new crimes, which include property offenses, drug offenses, public-order offenses, other offences, unknown, and over 100,000 of these crimes were violent crimes. Of the new violent crimes committed, 2,871 were murder and 2,444 were rape
 
Last edited:
superdave said:
Agree to disagree on this philosophy.


Harsh sentences deter future crimes bor, thats why a state like Texas (high ass death penalty rate) have less severe crime problems than others


The recidivism rate for prisoners released from prison within one year is 44.1%; this number rises to 67.5% within three years of being released from prison. Sixty-seven percent of the people who were rearrested were charged with 750,000 new crimes, which include property offenses, drug offenses, public-order offenses, other offences, unknown, and over 100,000 of these crimes were violent crimes. Of the new violent crimes committed, 2,871 were murder and 2,444 were rape
Click to expand...


the recidivism argument is a really important one.

however i would point out that the recidivism rates for rapists and murderers are a lot lower; only 6% of released murderers were arrested for murder again, and 3% of rapists were arrested for rape again
 
Last edited:
BlueBird said:
Considering there are over 6.5 billion people on this planet, and a good percentage of these, probably, want to leave a good legacy for humankind...well, this guy can curl up and die already.
Click to expand...

agreed.
we have enough people contributing to society. we don't need him.
 
spam or not fuck Richard Blenkey.
and while i agree with nimbus's arguement to some degree, a crime
as henious sexually assaulted a minor then killing them can never
be redeemed.
now if there is questionable evidence, misconduct, etc, then it
needs to play out in court.
but for a solid case,
hang or firing squad...even these two methods are too civilized
 
superdave said:
Harsh sentences deter future crimes bor, thats why a state like Texas (high ass death penalty rate) have less severe crime problems than others
Click to expand...

That is simply not true.

My state has a murder rate of about 1 per 100,000. Compare that to anywhere in the US.

We have far lower rates of incarceration than any US state, no death penalty either.








b0und (severe punishment /= lower crime)
 
b0und said:
That is simply not true.

My state has a murder rate of about 1 per 100,000. Compare that to anywhere in the US.

We have far lower rates of incarceration than any US state, no death penalty either.








b0und (severe punishment /= lower crime)
Click to expand...

this happened in england, nothing to do with the usa.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Liquid Gold Labs
  • Sticky
Silver Supplier 💎 Liquid Gold Labs Updates + Announcements 💎
Replies
9
Views
2K
pigsy
pigsy
~Vision~
PSL Article PSL FAQ's to read before contacting a representative (UPDATED) WELCOME HELP CENTER
Replies
0
Views
604
~Vision~
~Vision~
Richardbrown
You have a gift from NapsGear!
Replies
15
Views
2K
brainacid
brainacid
S
73 years old, cancer and the road ahead.
Replies
6
Views
1K
smalljohn
S
A
Please help, Anavar/Oxavar question???
Replies
3
Views
2K
bubblebutt3
B
Top Bottom