Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply US-PHARMACIES UGL OZ
Raptor Labs UGFREAK OxygenPharm
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplyUS-PHARMACIES UGL OZUGFREAKRaptor LabsOxygenPharm

Serum Androgen Bioactivity During DHT Treatment

lanky

Well-known member
The androgens used in the treatment of age-related androgen decline have different bioactivities that cannot be evaluated with conventional detection methods for serum steroids. We have recently developed a recombinant cell bioassay for the determination of androgen bioactivity in human serum that is based on androgen-specific interaction between the ligand-binding domain (LBD) and the N-terminal region of the androgen receptor (AR). In this work, we examined the effect of topically applied 5-dihydrotestosterone (DHT; 7.5-10 g of 2.5% DHT gel daily for 6 months) on circulating androgen bioactivity in 14 men (age range, 51-63 years) with symptoms of andropause and pretreatment serum testosterone less than 15 nM, or serum sex hormone-binding globulin concentration greater than 30 nM, or both. The mean (±SEM) pretreatment androgen bioactivity was 3.3 ± 0.3 nM testosterone equivalents, and the levels correlated with serum testosterone concentration (r = .55, P < .05). DHT gel treatment induced a sixfold increase (from 1.5 ± 0.1 nM to 9.0 ± 0.7 nM) in mean serum DHT level, whereas endogenous testosterone and estradiol levels measured with radioimmunoassays were suppressed by approximately 70% and approximately 50%, respectively (P < .0001). Concomitantly, serum androgen bioactivity increased by sevenfold (from 3.3 ± 0.3 to 23.6 ± 2.8 nM testosterone equivalents; P < .0001). We conclude that DHT gel therapy in elderly men significantly increases their circulating androgen bioactivity as measured with a mammalian cell bioassay. An androgen-specific bioassay such as ours may enable investigation of other androgens with different bioactivities, such as selective AR modulators
In men, serum testosterone levels decline and serum sex hormone—binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations increase with aging; these reciprocal changes lead to even faster decline in bioavailable (non-SHBG bound) testosterone than that observed in total serum testosterone concentration alone (Basaria and Dobs, 2001; Snyder, 2001; Vermeulen, 2001). The symptoms of age-related androgen deficiency may include decreased muscle mass, osteoporosis, increased central body fat, and subjective symptoms such as decrease in libido, loss of memory, insomnia, and a lesser sense of well-being (Snyder, 2001; Vermeulen, 2001). It is possible to treat age-related androgen decline with oral testosterone derivatives, injections of testosterone esters, transdermal/transscrotal testosterone patches, or with transdermal 5-dihydrotestosterone (DHT).

Because androgens used in substitution therapy differ in their biological activities and may interfere with the endogenous androgen-estrogen balance, the effect of steroid treatment on the circulating androgen milieu has been difficult to evaluate on the basis of biochemical measures. To this end, we have recently developed a mammalian cell bioassay that is based on androgen-dependent interaction between the ligand-binding domain (LBD) and the N-terminal region of the androgen receptor (AR; Raivio et al, 2001). The assay is androgen-specific, accounts for differences in androgen bioactivities, and enables detection of androgen bioactivity in human serum (Raivio et al, 2001). The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of DHT gel treatment on serum androgen bioactivity in elderly men (Kunelius et al, 2002) who used a transdermal steroid application for 6 months. We have previously observed that this treatment significantly alters serum DHT-testosterone balance, but the net effect on circulating androgen bioactivity is equivocal.


Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References


Subjects

Fourteen men (age range 51-63 years, mean 55 years) from a previous study (Kunelius et al, 2002) treated with transdermal DHT gel were investigated. In short, the men should have had rarefaction of nocturnal penile tumescence and at least one of the following andropause symptoms: decreased libido, erectile dysfunction, urinary disorders, asthenia, or depressive mood together with either serum testosterone level less than 15 nM or serum SHBG concentration greater than 30 nM, or both. The men applied 2.5% DHT gel (Laboratories Besins Iscovesco, Paris, France) 7.5-10 g daily to upper arms/shoulders or to the abdomen. The dose of the gel was adjusted on the basis of serum DHT concentrations measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA) after 3 weeks of treatment (Kunelius et al, 2002). The study was approved by the ethical committee of the University of Oulu.

All plasmid constructs together with cell culture and transfection procedures of the androgen bioassay have been described elsewhere (Raivio et al, 2001). In short, COS-1 cells were transiently transfected with plasmids encoding the LBD and the N-terminal region of the AR. In the presence of androgens, these proteins interact, which is amplified by the ARIP3 coactivator expressed ectopically in the same cells. The reporter gene (luciferase) activity in cell lysates is derived from the androgen bioactivity in human serum added directly to the culture medium. Serum from each subject was sterile-filtered and stored at -70°C until used in the bioassay. Circulating androgen bioactivity was measured before and at 6 months of DHT treatment. The values are expressed in nanomolar testosterone equivalents

Hormone levels before and during DHT treatment obtained with immunoassays have been described elsewhere (Kunelius et al, 2002). In short, testosterone levels were determined using an ACS:180 chemiluminescence system with an ACS:180 analyzer (Chiron Corp, Emeryville, Calif) with intraassay and interassay coefficients of variation (CVs) of 4.0% and 5.6%, respectively. Serum DHT concentrations were measured by RIA after organic extraction and hydrophobic chromatography (Apter et al, 1976); the intra-assay and interassay CVs were 9.1% and 6.6%, respectively. Serum SHBG, luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations were measured by fluoroimmunometric methods with kits obtained from Perkin Elmer Life Sciences (Turku, Finland) using a 1235 AutoDELFIA automatic immunoassay system. The intra-assay and interassay CVs were as follows: SHBG, 1.3% and 5.1%; LH, 4.9% and 6.5%; FSH, 3.8% and 4.3%; and PSA, 1.2% and 3.8%. Serum estradiol levels were measured by RIA (Orion Diagnostica, Turku, Finland) with intra-assay and inter-assay CVs of 5.7% and 6.4%, respectively.

Data Analysis

The relationships between different variables were assessed with Spearman rank correlation analysis. A paired t test was used to investigate the treatment-induced changes in paired variables. Results were considered statistically significant when P < .05.
Circulating androgen bioactivity (ABA) was investigated in 14 elderly men (Kunelius et al, 2002) using a recently validated androgen bioassay (Raivio et al, 2001). Mean (±SEM) serum hormone levels for these men at baseline are shown in the Figure. Serum ABA levels (mean 3.3 ± 0.3 nM, range 1.4-4.6 nM testosterone equivalents) correlated positively with serum testosterone levels (r = .55, n = 14, P < .05), but not significantly with age, serum gonadotropin, estradiol, DHT, or PSA levels.

Results
Treatment with DHT gel for 6 months brought about clear changes in serum sex steroid levels measured with RIAs: mean DHT concentration increased sixfold (from 1.5 ± 0.1 nM to 9.0 ± 0.7 nM P < .0001), testosterone concentration was suppressed (from 14.7 ± 1.0 nM to 4.1 ± 0.5 nM P < .0001), and serum estradiol concentration decreased (from 86 ± 5 to 44 ± 5 pM P < .0001). In addition, the sum of DHT and testosterone concentrations measured with RIAs decreased (from 16.2 ± 1.0 nM to 13.1 ± 0.9 nM during the treatment P < .01). Simultaneously with these changes, serum ABA displayed a substantial increase (from 3.3 ± 0.3 to 23.6 ± 2.8 nM testosterone equivalents; P < .0001). These changes are illustrated in the Figure. DHT treatment also suppressed mean LH levels (from 3.9 ± 0.4 IU/L to 2.2 ± 0.5 IU/L; P < .001), and FSH levels (from 4.7 ± 0.6 to 2.7 ± 0.4 IU/L; P < .001; n = 13). Mean serum SHBG at 0 months was 43 ± 3 nM, and at 6 months it was 38 ± 2 nM (P = .051); serum PSA did not change significantly during the study. At the end of the study, serum ABA and DHT levels were positively correlated (r = 0.67; n = 14, P < .05).

Discussion

The biological potencies of androgens available for substitution therapy differ, which cannot be evaluated by conventional detection methods for serum steroids. We have therefore introduced a novel means for quantifying circulating androgen bioactivity in elderly men by using a recombinant cell bioassay based on the androgen-specific interaction between two fragments of AR. The strengths of this assay are the specificity for androgens and the capability to account for differences in androgen biopotencies (Raivio et al, 2001).

At the onset of the study, serum testosterone and androgen bioactivity levels were positively correlated, suggesting that testosterone determines the circulating androgen milieu in elderly men. We have previously observed a similar relationship in prepubertal and early pubertal boys (Raivio et al, 2001). Serum androgen bioactivity levels in men after 6 months of DHT treatment were higher than in boys or men without treatments affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis (unpublished observations). DHT has higher affinity for the AR (Quigley et al, 1995) and it is a more potent androgen than testosterone. In agreement with these findings, serum androgen bioactivity increased during the course of this study, despite the decline in circulating testosterone levels. This suggests that our bioassay can be applied to investigate potencies of androgens used in substitution therapy. For example, relatively little is known about the androgenic properties of 7-methyl-19-nortestosterone (MENT), a selective androgen receptor modulator already employed in androgen replacement therapy for men with hypogonadism (Anderson et al, 1999).

Currently used assays for evaluating responses to exogenous androgens in humans are not necessarily androgen-specific. For example, serum gonadotropin and SHBG levels are both affected by the actions of androgens and estrogens (van Look and Frölich, 1981; Sinnecker and Köhler, 1989; Finkelstein et al, 1991). Exogenous androgens used in the substitution therapy may be converted to estrogens by the aromatase enzyme, or androgens may alter the circulating androgen-estrogen balance by interfering with the function of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis, or both may occur. In keeping with the latter mechanism, topically applied DHT decreased serum estradiol levels in subjects in the present study. By contrast, the bioassay employed in this work is specific for androgens and should therefore be well suited for monitoring serum androgen bioactivity induced by the substitution therapy.

In conclusion, we have measured serum androgen bioactivity levels in elderly men before and during transdermal DHT therapy by using a recently developed androgen bioassay. Our results show that transdermal DHT significantly increases serum androgen bioactivity, despite a significant decrease in serum testosterone measured by RIA. A bioassay such as ours offers a novel means for monitoring bioactivities of drugs acting through the androgen receptor.
 
You would want to block the DHT in the prostate and hair follicles correct? Using test instead of DHT, you can get androgen activity without DHT activity (using dutasteride)......wouldnt that be better?

Although DHT hasnt been shown to CAUSE prostate/testicular cancer (not carcinogenic inherently), it can exacerbate BPH and eventually lead to it. Like estrogen in breat cancers, hormone dependent neoplasams use hormones so having excess of DHT, estro is like throwing gasoline on a fire.

Just a thought!
 
bigrand said:
You would want to block the DHT in the prostate and hair follicles correct? Using test instead of DHT, you can get androgen activity without DHT activity (using dutasteride)......wouldnt that be better?

Although DHT hasnt been shown to CAUSE prostate/testicular cancer (not carcinogenic inherently), it can exacerbate BPH and eventually lead to it. Like estrogen in breat cancers, hormone dependent neoplasams use hormones so having excess of DHT, estro is like throwing gasoline on a fire.

Just a thought!


ahhh..wanting to block Dht in the hair follicle and prostate? i guess If the situation calls for the measure of dutasteride it is benificial in reducing the size of the prostate and keeping hairloss at a reduced rate. Yes testosterone by itself is inherintly androgenic without having to be 5 alpha reduced,,at the pheripheral level metabolism at the prostate it it extensively metabolized to dht, from dht it gets turned into 3aplha androstenediol by the 3hsd enzyme, then some of the 3 apha androstenediol goes back into DHT by the same enzyme(its a reversible reaction). then 17 HSD gets a hold of it and turns it into a 17 keto(both the dht and 3alpha diol) then i think glucoronidased,,ahh wait that happens at the liver as well,, i will have to look that up tommorow about the metabolism in prostate tissue..i think i was good with the 3hsd part but the 17 keto may be incorrect..anywhay back to the answering...i am not sure if DHT exactly has been proven to cause it, but proven that 5 ar inhibitors which cause decreased levels at the tissue and serum levels, reduce size of the prostate. There is also evidence that in men with BPH who were given HRT with DHT showed decreased prostate size(though the administration of dht in a dose for HRT decreased estrogen/estradiol levels as well, possible implication estrogen playing a role.

As for the prostate cancer, yes initially all prostate cancer is androgen dependant, most therapy is aimed at reducing androgens to a castrate level(ohh i dont know off hand somewhere like less than 20ng/dl). the usual therapy is luprolide, flutamide, cant remember any other chemical castration drugs off hand. this therapy works initially but then the cancer always goes androgen independant(it sucks) and the patient will get advanced metastatic prostate cancer in which the usual location of spread is the bowel, lumbar spine, bone, eventually to organ, and the patient dies a slow death(sucks). AHH i just remembered i had a patient with prostate cancer a few months ago(cancer was all throughout his body) he has passed on. i have his PSA level in my chart(i will alter the number a a digit because of HIPPA) i believe it was well over 1000
 
just adding i forgot to say that even the amount of adrenal androgens(androstenedione) when they are on androgen eprevation therapy, stimulate the cancer cells..serlective 3HSD inhibition will be the future of prostate cancer threatment.mark my words
 
I want to research mech of further mutation of neoplasms (androgen dependant to independant.....fuckin tumors are like bacteria, adapt hella fast).

Curious, when you have cancer patients, do you refer them to trials or is that the oncos job? I wanted to be an onco, but they are so strapped and only do the normal protocol treatment, even though everyones cancers are different, even if from same organ. My dad had pancreatic cancer in 2000 and i wanted to put him on chemo sensitivity testing, his onco wouldnt buy it. It cured another panc cancer guy i met. My dads doc said "what works for one wont work for all, all are differrent" but earlier he said they are giving my dad the "standard" cisplatin/gemcitabine treatment.........IF THEY ARE ALL DIFFERRENT WHY ARE YOU GIVEING THEM THE SAME CHEMO REGEMIN>>>>>? Fuckin retard.

The majority of the anti-neos SHOULD act the same invivo as they do invitro (usually they are shunted directly to the tumor)...so testing for the most responsive combo on a biopsy is smart IMO, cutts back on sides and improves chemo effectiveness....instead of taking a shot in the dark basically.
(Dr. Robert Nogurney (sp) Rational Theraputics)

p53 reactivation all the way (or any other null gene that the neoplasm is found to have).......thats kind of where i want to go. The results with peritoneal carcinomatosis were awsome compared to "standard" treatment.....sides practically non existant (dont work on normal tissues, unlike most other anti-neos). This is the future of cancer care........TAT proteins combined with the gene segment needed bind to the null gene and reactivate it. Downey, or Dowdy, something like that, is on to something.

As for the prostate, there are your ER neg, AR pos strains....im guessing DHT plays the major role in that one, 5-AR inhibitors would be best there......id still rather go Test shots instead of DHT, DHT is the major player, testosterone itself.....not really.....estro....thats another story! Considering BPH is VERY common with age, 5-AR inhibitors will be so widely used, throwing DHT in there would be counterproductive.

Im still learning, so bear with my if im wrong!
 
This Link is interesting.


http://www.hairloss-research.org/testosteroneBPH-Oct2001.html


Here are 2 paragraphs from the link that state androstenedione may be actually benifial.



"At Leeds University in England5 human prostate tissue with BPH was found to be deficient in androstenedione.

At the University of Edinburgh in Scotland27 doctors demonstrated androstenedione was a powerful inhibitor of 5-alpha reductase activity in the human prostate and had clinical therapeutic potential.



At the University of Rochester in New York28 doctors found an analog of androstenedione called 5-androstenediol (commonly sold over-the-counter) had potential anti-cancer activity in human prostate cells. They concluded that the current theory of androgen blockage needs to be changed."
 
I have nothing to do with referals to clinical trials. that is not my field and beyond my scope of knowledge. i will try to get you some solid info on the pancreatic cancer in a few weeks when i will be talking to someone who has been in healthcare for many years and is a walking medical/nursing/healthcare dictionary. the only understanding i have is with prostate cancer from personal research. 5AR inhibitors are common as you said, and alpha adrenergics(relaxes smooth muscle around the prostate and is a dual therapeutic drug because it is used for hypertensions as well,,cant remember off hand the names of the drugs bit i know they end in "zosin"). If those two therapies do not work patient may have to undergo a TURP(basicly cutting out the peice of the prostate(it sucks because of the high rate of sexual dysfunction after)..The prostate seems to be the organ of problems for most older men..

That 5 androstenediol seems interesting..i coud not get the link to work though
 
Top Bottom