msam76 said:I would seriously hate to see what Ronnie looks like in 30 years!
![]()
veng said:Apologies if this is a repost but do you folks think this is a fair comparison between Arnie and Coleman?
I've read on this forum several times about Arnies legs being thin blah blah. But it goes to show the size of Ronnies![]()
![]()
KD1 said:Arnold had one of those builds that "looked" bigger than it was. He competed around 225 I believe, and never got above 250 in the offseason. Clearly a lot of the weight difference was in the legs, but Arnold holds his own in the chest/back category and arms are not far behind with his peak. Even though Arnold had a thick waist in terms of bones, his slim waist looks way better than Ronnie's GH gut. Ronnie would crush him in a bodybuilding competition, but I would take Arnold's body over Ronnie's anyday.
msam76 said:I would seriously hate to see what Ronnie looks like in 30 years!
![]()
Twoguns said:Like arnold said in Pumping Iron, it is about symmetry and Proportion. That is bodybuilding. Not freakish size. Symmetry and Proportion goes for your body in relation to you head too. That being said, there has never been anyone better than Arnold IMHO.
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














