Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply puritysourcelabs US-PHARMACIES
UGL OZ Raptor Labs UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAKUS-PHARMACIESRaptor Labs

Schwarzenegger and Coleman

veng

New member
Apologies if this is a repost but do you folks think this is a fair comparison between Arnie and Coleman?

I've read on this forum several times about Arnies legs being thin blah blah. But it goes to show the size of Ronnies :shocked:

ronnie%20coleman(2002),%20arnold%20schwarzenegger(1975).jpg
 
Arnold had a much more "believable" physique. People though Arnie "might" be on steroids. When he came clean (lol!) people believed him when he said he only took some Primo and D-Bol to finish himself off for the Olympia.

However, he was taking juice by the truckload - Deca, Test, EQ, D-Bol, and Primo. But, he still had a very well defined physique unlike Ronnie who looks like an unnatural freak that can't control his use of GH.

However, if Arnie had access to HGH, he'd have taken that one by the truckload as well!!!
 
Arnold just flat out looks better, especially in the waist area. Coleman has more muscle but I think there is a point of diminishing returns where austhetics and health are compromised for sheer muscle size, and ronnie is way past that.
 
looks to me like arnold needed to hit up the squat rack! he didnt have the hourglass going on like coleman. not that im a pollsmoker - they both could kiss my ass.
 
Ronnie all the way!

Better symmetry. Legs twice the size than arnold's. And although you may not like his midsection, the same principle should apply to arnold. Arnold had huge arms and his legs never caught up with his upper body.
 
veng said:
Apologies if this is a repost but do you folks think this is a fair comparison between Arnie and Coleman?

I've read on this forum several times about Arnies legs being thin blah blah. But it goes to show the size of Ronnies :shocked:

ronnie%20coleman(2002),%20arnold%20schwarzenegger(1975).jpg

Great thread. Thanks.

I think Arnold looks so much better and while there's no way to tell, I'm sure his AAS use is far less comprehensive than Coleman's.

I still enjoy looking at Arnold pictures even after all these years. The guy was in a class all his own.
 
Arnold had one of those builds that "looked" bigger than it was. He competed around 225 I believe, and never got above 250 in the offseason. Clearly a lot of the weight difference was in the legs, but Arnold holds his own in the chest/back category and arms are not far behind with his peak. Even though Arnold had a thick waist in terms of bones, his slim waist looks way better than Ronnie's GH gut. Ronnie would crush him in a bodybuilding competition, but I would take Arnold's body over Ronnie's anyday.
 
KD1 said:
Arnold had one of those builds that "looked" bigger than it was. He competed around 225 I believe, and never got above 250 in the offseason. Clearly a lot of the weight difference was in the legs, but Arnold holds his own in the chest/back category and arms are not far behind with his peak. Even though Arnold had a thick waist in terms of bones, his slim waist looks way better than Ronnie's GH gut. Ronnie would crush him in a bodybuilding competition, but I would take Arnold's body over Ronnie's anyday.

I agree Arnold just "looks" better and if Arnold was competing today and taking what the guys are taking today and the nutrition and so on.

I think Arnold might give all of them a run for their money.

The man was a fierce competitor.

He also "crushed" them all in his life achievements.

You know you've reached superstar status when people know you by your first name. :)
 
Although I respect Ronnie for all of the work and sacrifice that has gone into making himself what he is today, I would never want to look like that. Most of the people I know wouldn't. I do think Arnold could use another inch or 2 on the thighs (forearms too), but not much more than that. He was almost perfect. How can you argue with the symetry. I guess everybody has there own views on what the would rather look like. Mine is Arnold, hands down !
 
Arnold had much deeper cuts and separation in his legs. I would say much better chest. You can't beat Coleman's back and arms. Overall, Coleman has the freakiest wheels right now...behind Branch Warren. It's tough to call. I am a diehard fan of both of these guys, but I think I would much rather walk around looking like Arnold every day of the week than I would looking like Ronnie. I think Arnold's physique inspired curiousity in people that saw him. People that see Ronnie are mostly shocked, and horrified that someone would do that to themselves.
 
I still don't think that picture is Arnold. The one where he looks like cap. Yeah I know that he had surgery but I don't think he would have fallen apart that quickly and he sure didn't loook like that for Term 3.
 
Arnold looks 100x better imo. Sure ronnies's obv bigger and has huge ugly legs but i would take arnolds legs over ronnies in a heartbeat. Arnold looks sooo much better and not to mention realistic.
 
Which one would get more pussy? Arnold all the way.

Ronnie looks like a retarded moron. Bodybuilding is so dead and guys like Ronnie killed it. Well, actually it's not Ronnie... its that judges that reward his overgrown, GH Gut physique.
 
yeah, Ronnie looks like a mutated side of beef. Can't believe someone in this thread said Arnold is 'missing' the hourglass look! Wrong gender bro lol.
 
Like arnold said in Pumping Iron, it is about symmetry and Proportion. That is bodybuilding. Not freakish size. Symmetry and Proportion goes for your body in relation to you head too. That being said, there has never been anyone better than Arnold IMHO.
 
Twoguns said:
Like arnold said in Pumping Iron, it is about symmetry and Proportion. That is bodybuilding. Not freakish size. Symmetry and Proportion goes for your body in relation to you head too. That being said, there has never been anyone better than Arnold IMHO.

yea, arnold said if he needed to add 2 inches to a certain body part, he'd need to add 2 inches to the rest of his body
 
Hey Guys,

Arnold definately has the type of physique where if they both walked down the street, Arnie would look really muscled to Joe Public, whereas Ronnie would look like a really big fat guy.

Who cares if Ronnies legs are hugh, they certainly don't look good for it and Arnolds Arms are just awesome.

For the guy who posted about Arnie and Terminator 3. Arnie broke his ribs in a biking accident and spent 3 months instead of his planned 6 months training for terminator 3.

He was determined to be in the same shape as the other terminator movies, a cut 16 stone and he was. He had to train with 15 set reps, I posted his training routine for that somewhere on a link I found so you have to give props to the guy.

If you look at Ronnie, pre Mr Olympia, you would notice he too looked more like Arnold than the swollen mass we see now.
 
Ronnie is a freak of nature. Giving him props with his achievments and his mass.
But arnold looks more athletic and fit, instead of just massive.
 
You cant compare the two on anything really.... Different era, different drugs, different judging. Both are extremely geneticly gifted.
 
Top Bottom