D
DcupSheepNipples
Guest
WHO experts say killer bug may come from animal
"We believe at this stage that it is more infectious than a disease like Ebola," he added.
By Dolly Aglay
31 Mar 2003
MANILA, March 31 (Reuters) - The World Health Organization said on Monday the pneumonia virus that killed nearly 60 people worldwide may have come from an animal and is more infectious than the Ebola virus that ravaged parts of Africa.
Hitoshi Oshitani, WHO's regional adviser on communicable diseases, said the world body was close to identifying the virus that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).
"We can identify the causative agent within a few days but we are not sure if we can develop the cure in such a short time," he told a news conference.
"The virus genome data shows that this virus might be coming from an animal."
But Oshitani discounted the possibility it was connected with bird flu, which has hit the poultry industry in Hong Kong in recent years.
"The bird flu is an influenza virus. The virus that we are talking about is completely different," he said.
The mysterious pneumonia has spread rapidly, killing 59 people from Canada to southern China, where it is thought to have originated. WHO says 1,550 people in 15 countries have tested positive for the virus.
Hong Kong and Singapore have shut all schools and ordered hundreds of potentially infected people to stay in their homes.
Oshitani said some diseases that infected people in recent years came from animals, such as the Ebola virus from monkeys and the Nipah virus from bats.
"We believe at this stage that it is more infectious than a disease like Ebola," he added.
Experts at WHO are looking at the possibility that the deadly pneumonia is caused by a strain of paramyxovirus or coronavirus. Paramyxovirus causes measles and pneumonia in children, while coronavirus causes the common cold.
If the virus originated from animals, it would be easier for epidemiologists to find a cure, Oshitani said.
"If this is an animal virus, we can probably have an animal model for the experiment," he said. "If this is just a human one, it's difficult to develop a human model."
"We believe at this stage that it is more infectious than a disease like Ebola," he added.
By Dolly Aglay
31 Mar 2003
MANILA, March 31 (Reuters) - The World Health Organization said on Monday the pneumonia virus that killed nearly 60 people worldwide may have come from an animal and is more infectious than the Ebola virus that ravaged parts of Africa.
Hitoshi Oshitani, WHO's regional adviser on communicable diseases, said the world body was close to identifying the virus that causes Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS).
"We can identify the causative agent within a few days but we are not sure if we can develop the cure in such a short time," he told a news conference.
"The virus genome data shows that this virus might be coming from an animal."
But Oshitani discounted the possibility it was connected with bird flu, which has hit the poultry industry in Hong Kong in recent years.
"The bird flu is an influenza virus. The virus that we are talking about is completely different," he said.
The mysterious pneumonia has spread rapidly, killing 59 people from Canada to southern China, where it is thought to have originated. WHO says 1,550 people in 15 countries have tested positive for the virus.
Hong Kong and Singapore have shut all schools and ordered hundreds of potentially infected people to stay in their homes.
Oshitani said some diseases that infected people in recent years came from animals, such as the Ebola virus from monkeys and the Nipah virus from bats.
"We believe at this stage that it is more infectious than a disease like Ebola," he added.
Experts at WHO are looking at the possibility that the deadly pneumonia is caused by a strain of paramyxovirus or coronavirus. Paramyxovirus causes measles and pneumonia in children, while coronavirus causes the common cold.
If the virus originated from animals, it would be easier for epidemiologists to find a cure, Oshitani said.
"If this is an animal virus, we can probably have an animal model for the experiment," he said. "If this is just a human one, it's difficult to develop a human model."