Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Risk Benefit ratio of bromocriptine - Macro and other knowledgeables on this

  • Thread starter Thread starter Frackal
  • Start date Start date
F

Frackal

Guest
Unfortunately the search isn't currently working for a cut and paste, but I've read on bromo, and I've seen opinions ranging from sides being: Mild and inconvienent to "isolated cases of cardiac complications, especially in younger users, side effects generally dose dependent."


I'm wondering, in your opinions, would bromo likely be an intelligent choice for me, early 20's to use after a deca/eq (650/600) cycle.

What are your feelings on the possible side effects of bromo? If kept at a low dosage, say, .625mg for 4 weeks or perhaps 1.25mg week 1,4 and .625mg weeks 2,3 .... possible that most side effects will be minimal while still accomplishing prolactin suppression?

Thanks. :)
 
Probably not what your looking for Frakal, but here my very short experiance with Bromo:

1. Made me absolutely sick to my stomach.
2. Had to force feed myself. Appetite was non existant. I think in t he course of 3 day I ate maybe 3000 cals CUMALATIVELY. And whenever I ate I felt like wanting to throw up.
3. Absolutely killed my energy. I could not function at all. Would be passing out in the middle of class.

Im 24. And I was doing 2.5mg a day. I quit after 3 days.
 
Are there any OTC/herbal/'natural' compounds that could be used in a similiar way to bromo?
 
I had exactly the same experience as hitmeoff, couldnt eat, sick etc. would never touch the shit again.
I have just finnishing cycle including 100mg ed of nand phenylprop and i got away with winny vitex and stinging nettle, maybe try those but have some bromo on hand incase you get in trouble.

dave
 
Deprenyl can suppress prolactin. I don't know how powerful it is in comparison to bromocriptine though. It is another anti-parkinson disease drug.
 
Why not grab some cabergoline Frack?Yes,it's more costly,but it's much better tolerated in terms of sides and is superior at prolactin inhibition.Just a thought.
 
I'm on Dostinex now. I was scripted for 0.5mg 2x/wk for "wrestless leg syndrome." Appetite definitely dropped but not strength and I do not appear to be in a catabolic state despite the lack of appetite. I know, strange. But I started feeling nausiated whenever I thought about food so I dropped my dose to half that. But I never did feel like vomiting after I ate like others have mentioned and I didn't feel lethargic either. If you wanna cut back on your appetite though, that's the stuff.
 
bromo is not the first drug of choice... though it is the cheapest and easiest.

prefer selegine and hydergine stack (liquid on both).. this can be used all the time at pretty decent dosages and good nootropic effect..

bromo, as a direct agonist, is for when there are problems already.. though it can be used more readily at the "sane" dosage of 1/4 tab before bed.. perhaps even EOD.
 
Androgens & progestins lower prolactin.

Your PRL will be in low normal range so there's no reason to use bromo.

If you still want to use it, keep the dose very low.

Cabergoline is a really strong drug which will cause hypoprolactinaemia in normoprolactinemic men.

Hypoprolactinaemia negatively affects HPTA...
 
Last edited:
Bromo is not as bad as people make it out to be. It does take a few days to get used too, but as long as u start off with a low dose and titrate up, the sides are nothing major. As for long term use, I would tend to think that it could not be too good for you. Did not affect my appetite that much, although I did notice a difference.
 
progestins either agonist or antagonist can raise prolactin.

androgens can both raise and lower prolactin.. extended use tends to raise PRL levels

a normal to sub normal daily reading is irrelevant..

while PRL release is pulsatile, as you have mentioned elsewhere it is the release during sleep (by far the largest spike.. ) from whence the problem arises.

btw- have you used any of these drugs?
 
No.

Androgens in general lower prolactin.

People who have prolactinomas have PRL over >200 ng/dl, frequently 1000 or more...

PRL peaks during sleep, early in the morning, but that's not going to increase PRL from 5 to 50 ng/dl...

Cabergoline is a very strong drug which will reduce PRL of normal men to below normal level...
Chronic use of bromo at 2.5-5 mg ED will do that also.
That will lead to hypoprlactinemia which actually has a negative effect on HPTA, that's all I have to say.

Your PRL will drop on cycle, notice that PRL was reduced by almost 50 % in the group of AS users.

Estrogens (aromatizable AS) in general cause an increase in PRL, which can easily be controlled by SERMs / Aromatase inhibitors.

That's all I have to say...







Effect of androgenic anabolic steroids on sperm quality and serum hormone levels in adult male bodybuilders.

Torres-Calleja J, Gonzalez-Unzaga M, DeCelis-Carrillo R, Calzada-Sanchez L, Pedron N.

Unidad de Investigacion Medica en Biologia de la Reproduccion, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico, DF.

The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of the administration of high doses of androgenic anabolic steroids (AAS) on endocrine and semen parameters. Thirty volunteering bodybuilders were studied (ages ranging between 26.6 +/- 4.1 years). A history of anabolic steroid administration was recorded for fifteen subjects, and results of semen analysis and endocrine parameters were compared with data from fifteen bodybuilders not using steroids. In those subjects using AAS, eight had sperm counts under the lower normal limit (20 x 10(6) sperm/ml), three had azoospermia, two polyzoospermia, and two had normal sperm counts. The percentage of morphologically normal sperm was significantly reduced, only 17.7% had normal spermatozoa. In the control group, only one subject had oligozoospermia. The hormonal parameters revealed reduced FSH (1.5 +/- 3.2 vs 5.0 +/- 1.6, p < 0.001) and PRL (5.1 +/- 4.9 vs 9.2 +/- 4.4, p < 0.01) levels. LH, T, E2 and DHEA levels did not vary.







Int J Androl 1984 Feb;7(1):53-60 Related Articles, Links


Prolactin secretion in the human male is increased by endogenous oestrogens and decreased by exogenous/endogenous androgens.

Gooren LJ, van der Veen EA, van Kessel H, Harmsen-Louman W, Wiegel AR.

There is evidence that prolactin may be involved in testicular steroidogenesis, and we have therefore investigated whether there is feedback regulation of androgens/oestrogens on prolactin secretion in the human male. To assess this we have measured basal and TRH-stimulated prolactin levels in: Six eugonadal men before and after 2 weeks' administration of the aromatase inhibitor delta'-testolactone, which led to a fall in oestradiol levels with unchanged levels of testosterone. In these patients, prolactin levels decreased. Six eugonadal subjects before and after 6 weeks' administration of dihydrotestosterone undecanoate. In these subjects, prolactin levels decreased. Six agonadal subjects, tested after 12 weeks' treatment with dihydrotestosterone undecanoate and compared to: Six agonadal subjects who received no sex steroid treatment. Again, it was found that dihydrotestosterone treatment decreased prolactin levels in patients from Group C. Six eugonadal subjects were also studied before and after 6 weeks' administration of the androgen receptor antagonist, spironolactone, and this treatment increased Prl secretion. It is concluded that in the human male, endogenous oestrogens increase prolactin secretion whilst exogenous/endogenous androgens decrease prolactin secretion







Nandrolone & prolactin


Clin Nephrol 1989 Oct;32(4):198-201 Related Articles, Links


Anabolic steroid-associated hypogonadism in male hemodialysis patients.

Maeda Y, Nakanishi T, Ozawa K, Kijima Y, Nakayama I, Shoji T, Sasaoka T.

Dialysis Center, Yokosuka Kyosai Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

Hypogonadism in male hemodialysis patients has been previously reported. However, its precise pathogenesis has not yet been clarified. Mepitiostane and nandrolone decanoate are anabolic steroids prescribed for uremic anemia, and those may possibly exacerbate uremic gonadal damage. We studied the influences of these steroids on male gonadal function. Seventy-six hemodialysis patients were selected and examined for levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), follicular stimulating hormone (FSH), total testosterone, and prolactin. Twenty-three patients who received anabolic steroids showed lower testosterone values (205.2 +/- 35.6 ng/dl) than did patients without these steroids (449.7 +/- 21.3 ng/dl). Gonadotropins and prolactin showed no significant differences between the patients with and without the steroids. The testosterone values of three patients with mepitiostane increased after they stopped taking steroids. One patient suffering from complete aspermia recovered (sperm count: 0/ml to 1300 x 10(4)/ml) after discontinuation of mepitiostane and administration of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). This clinical study suggests that some anabolic steroids play a role in uremic hypogonadism; thus mepitiostane or its analogues should be carefully prescribed for young male patients.







J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1993 Apr;76(4):1069-71 Related Articles, Links


Ingestion of androgenic-anabolic steroids induces mild thyroidal impairment in male body builders.

Deyssig R, Weissel M.

Third Medical University Clinic, Vienna, Austria.

Self-administration of very high doses of androgenic anabolic steroids is common use in power athletes because of their favorable effect on performance. Since androgenic steroids decrease serum T4-binding globulin (TBG) concentrations dramatically, we were interested in the effects of this procedure on thyroid function: we performed TRH tests (200 micrograms Relefact, i.v.), with blood withdrawal before and for 180 min after injection, for determination, using RIA kits, of serum concentrations of total and free T4, total T3, TSH, and TBG in 13 young (20-29 yr old) male body builders with clinically normal thyroid glands, who were all in the same state of training. Five of these athletes admitted taking androgenic anabolic steroids at an average total dose of 1.2 g/week for at least 6 weeks before the tests. TBG, total T4, and total T3 were significantly (P < 0.001) decreased, whereas basal TSH and free T4 were not significantly different from the values of the other 8 without androgenic steroids. The maximum TSH increase after TRH administration (mean +/- SE, 16 -/+ 6 vs. 9 -/+ 4 mU/L; P < 0.05) was relatively increased, whereas the T3 response to TRH (0.61 -/+ 0.10 vs. 1.13 -/+ 0.13 nmol/L; P < 0.05) was relatively decreased in the group receiving androgens. The 5 patients taking androgens had significantly greater weight (114 vs. 90 kg; P < 0.01) and higher total cholesterol levels (6.3 -/+ 1.3 vs. 3.8 -/+ 0.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05) together with very low high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (0.20 -/+ 0.03 vs. 1.03 -/+ 0.10; P < 0.001) than the controls. PRL levels were normal and similar in both groups. We conclude from our results that high dose androgenic anabolic steroid administration leads to a relative impairment (within the normal range) of thyroid function. Whether this is due to a direct thyroid hormone release (or synthesis?)-blocking effect of these steroids needs further investigation.







Fertil Steril 2003 Jan;79(1):203-5 Links


Use of clomiphene citrate to reverse premature andropause secondary to steroid abuse.

Case report
A 30-year-old patient presented with severe depression and loss of libido and energy. He admitted to the use of steroids for bodybuilding purposes for several months. He had obtained nandrolone decanoate, deca Durabolin, primobolan depot, and Winstrol from a foreign country without a prescription. He is on an antidepressant, bupropion (Wellbutrin, Glaxo Smith Kline, Philadelphia, PA).
....
ust before clomiphene citrate administration, laboratory examination revealed a total T of 71 ng/dL (reference range, 260–1000 ng/dL), free T of 29 pg/dL (reference range, 34–194 pg/dL), bioavailable T of 61 ng/dL (reference range, 84–402 ng/dL), LH of 3.7 miu/mL (reference range, 1.5–9.3 miu/mL), FSH of 2.4 miu/mL (reverence range 1.4–18.1 miu/mL), prolactin of 5 ng/mL (reference range, 2–18 ng/mL), and TSH of 1.36 miu/mL (reference range, 0.40–5.50 miu/mL)




Prolactin increase is caused by elevated estrogen.

Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1984 Feb;105(2):167-72

Testosterone-induced hyperprolactinaemia in a patient with a disturbance of hypothalamo-pituitary regulation.

Nicoletti I, Filipponi P, Fedeli L, Ambrosi F, Gregorini G, Santeusanio F.

A case of a patient with hypopituitarism due to a disturbance of hypothalamo-pituitary regulation is presented, who developed high-grade hyperprolactinaemia after the initiation of substitutive therapy with testosterone esthers.The increase in serum Prl was strictly related to testosterone aromatization to oestradiol, since anti-oestrogen compounds were effective in reducing (clomiphene) or abolishing (tamoxifen) the enhanced Prl secretion. The oestrogen effect in raising Prl release was not attributable to a reduction in the dopamine inhibition of Prl-secreting cells, as the dopamine-antagonist domperidone failed to increase Prl serum levels in the same patient. This suggests that, in man, the oestrogen effect in enhancing Prl release is mainly enacted directly on the pituitary lactotrophs rather than exerted through a reduction in the hypothalamic dopamine activity.





Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1982 Nov;17(5):495-9 Related Articles, Links


Hydrotestolactone lowers serum oestradiol and PRL levels in normal men: evidence of a role of oestradiol in prl secretion.

D'Agata R, Aliffi A, Maugeri G, Mongioi A, Vicari E, Gulizia S, Polosa P.

The effect on serum PRL levels of lowering serum oestradiol (E2) concentration by short-term administration of an aromatase activity inhibitor, hydrotestolactone (HT), was studied in six healthy male subjects. After HT administration serum E2 levels decreased from 68 +/- 5.8 to 26 +/- 2.5 pmol/l (mean +/- SE, P less than 0.05). These E2 changes were accompanied by a significant decrease in mean 2-h PRL levels from 11.2 +/- 2.1 to 6.5 +/- 1.6 ng/ml mean +/- SE, P less than 0.05). The evaluation of individual percentage change from basal concentrations showed a varying decrease in all subjects. These findings suggest that under physiological conditions E2 may be one of the factors which control blood PRL concentrations in men




From:

Bromocriptine Addendum by Lyle McDonald

... normal prolactin seems to be necessary to keep LH receptor levels at the proper levels; reducing prolactin far below normal could reduce the sensitivity of the testes to LH, which would reduce testosterone output...






Fertil Steril 1991 Feb;55(2):355-7 Related Articles, Links


Effects of chronic bromocriptine-induced hypoprolactinemia on plasma testosterone responses to human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation in normal men.

Oseko F, Nakano A, Morikawa K, Endo J, Taniguchi A, Usui T.

Department of Medicine, Shimane Medical University, Japan.

To study the role played by normal levels of plasma prolactin (PRL) in the secretion of testosterone (T) in the testes, we induced hypoprolactinemia with a daily dose of 5 mg bromocriptine administered orally in five normal men 20 to 35 years of age for 8 weeks. The basal PRL, T, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and maximum responses of plasma T to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) stimulation were measured every 2 weeks. Basal levels of plasma T were reduced in the 1st 2-week-long period of hypoprolactinemia. In the 4-week-long period of hypoprolactinemia, the maximal response of plasma T to hCG stimulation was significantly reduced. The findings suggest that normal levels of plasma PRL may play an important role in the secretion of T in the human testes in vivo.
 
Bromo reduces endogenous GH levels. One thing to look for from raised prolactin levels, the milk that comes from your tits is great with some whey protein!
 
pharmguy said:
Bromo reduces endogenous GH levels. One thing to look for from raised prolactin levels, the milk that comes from your tits is great with some whey protein!

References? I've never heard that.

Here's my take on bromo. Yes, it's made me sick once.. REALLY sick. But that was when I took a full tab right before an intense leg workout.

I've recently re-added the bromo into my cycle cause I'm cutting and it's great for that. It's pretty much the only thing I've ever tried that completely obliterates my apetite. That has always been my downfall on diets, but this one I'm cruising through. I dont get sick anymore either, I think that passes after a few days and if you take the bromo with a small meal. The fat is just melting off, I love it.

Strength wise I'm still good, I've been taking 1/2 tab ed for the past 2 weeks. I'm also on test/fina/t3/proviron.
 
btw- will get to those studies.. when there is time.. dont worry :D

but the answer to the question

HAVE YOU USED ANY OF THESE DRUGS?

WAS... NO.

just to keep that straight.
 
So if you're taking bromo to keep prolactin levels down while doing fina then what would help with the appetite? The only thing I can think of is Eq but I don't want to add more gear into the mix at this point.
 
hhajdo said:
Androgens & progestins lower prolactin.

Your PRL will be in low normal range so there's no reason to use bromo.

If you still want to use it, keep the dose very low.

Cabergoline is a really strong drug which will cause hypoprolactinaemia in normoprolactinemic men.

Hypoprolactinaemia negatively affects HPTA...

DITTO; beautifully and sophisticatedly stated!

BTW, macro, I have used bromo multiple times, if it matters. I however, also think that its use post-cycle is ridiculous at most.

Frackal, if you would like answers to most of your questions regarding the no-no's of post-cycle prolactin suppression, VOILA:
http://www.cuttingedgemuscle.com/Forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1228

This is seriously a VERY informative thread.
 
I know Dostinex was mentioned once... but... largely ignored...

Macro / Frackal:

What about Dostinex?
 
notatrase said:


DITTO; beautifully and sophisticatedly stated!

BTW, macro, I have used bromo multiple times, if it matters. I however, also think that its use post-cycle is ridiculous at most.

Frackal, if you would like answers to most of your questions regarding the no-no's of post-cycle prolactin suppression, VOILA:
http://www.cuttingedgemuscle.com/Forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1228

This is seriously a VERY informative thread.

That's is an interesting thread. :)
 
J Androl 1996 Jan-Feb;17(1):35-40 Related Articles, Links


Hypoprolactinemia does not prevent restoration of normal spermatogenesis in gonadotropin-suppressed, testosterone-replaced rats.

Awoniji CA, Roberts D, Chandrashekar V, Hurst BS, Tucker KE, Schlaff WD.

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver 80262, USA.

We have previously shown that suppression of gonadotropins and spermatogenesis can be produced in rats by immunization against gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH). Administration of testosterone (T) alone is effective in restoring complete spermatogenesis in these rats, although it is not effective in doing so in chronically treated hypophysectomized rats. This suggests that a pituitary factor(s) other than luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) is required to restore normal spermatogenesis. The studies described herein test the hypothesis that prolactin (PRL) is the additional requirement for complete restoration of spermatogenesis. Twenty rats were immunized against GnRH, and four groups of five each received either 1) 24-cm T-filled Silastic implant (TSl), 2) TSl plus bromocriptine pellet (B), 3) B plus empty Silastic implant (Sl), or 4) Sl alone. Five nonimmunized rats received Sl alone and served as controls. All rats were sacrificed 2 months after treatment. GnRH immunization and B administration suppressed gonadotropins and PRL levels, respectively, and advanced spermatids were not detectable in these rats. Testis weight was suppressed to about 19% of controls. The number of advanced spermatids in control rats was 220 +/- 23 x 10(6). TSl administration restored advanced spermatids to numbers comparable to controls in GnRH-immunized rats whether the rat received B (191 +/- 17 x 106) or not (217 +/- 18 x 10(6)). Additionally, we determined mRNA levels for PRL and FSH beta subunit (FSH beta) in the pituitary by Northern blot and densitometric scanning. The mRNA levels of PRL mirrored serum PRL levels, and the same was true for FSH beta subunits and serum FSH levels. These data show that suppression of PRL has no effect on the ability of T to restore complete spermatogenesis in GnRH-immunized rats. This observation mitigates against the hypothesis that PRL is the pituitary factor required to allow complete restoration of spermatogenesis to occur.
 
study issues.. just some of them
1. mexico + night time values + methodology
2. 6 subject.. eugonadal..
3. .. night time values..?? they are the ones that matter
4. 5 subjects and prolactin levels should not be normal if t3 suppressed-- and contradicts other study
5. case study.. 1 subject
6. case study.. 1 subject
7. agree that E is a factor.. there are quite few studies that point to this
8. there is another study that directly contradicts this
Invest Clin 1996 Sep;37(3):153-66 Related Articles, Links


[Leydig cell function in hyper- or hypoprolactinemic states in healthy men]

[Article in Spanish]

Marin-Lopez G, Vilchez-Martinez J, Hernandez-Yanez L, Torres-Morales A, Bishop W.

Departamento de Fisiopatologia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Los Andes, Merida, Venezuela.

In the present investigation the function of the Leydig cells, as the response of gonadal steroids to the injections i.m. of 2000 UI of hCG, was studied in 11 normal men, before and after the induction of hyper or hypoprolactinemia with sulpiride and bromocriptine treatments respectively. The normal response to hCG, showed an increment of serum estradiol concentration 24 h and another of serum testosterone 72 h after the administration of the gonadotropin. The serum FSH concentration decreased during the test. An increase of serum LH levels was observed in the hypoprolactinemic state, but the increment of estradiol was lower after injection of hCG. On the other hand, the hyperprolactinemia induced a low basal level of testosterone with a higher response of this steroid to hCG. The results suggest that hyperprolactinemia interfers the estradiol synthesis by Leydig cells while the loss of the trophic effect of prolactin on gonadal steroidogenesis, as seen in hypoprolactinemia produces a decrease of basal testosterone levels without any alteration of the response of this steroid to hCG. We conclude that prolactin plays an important role in the steroidogenesis of Leydig cells in normal men
 
I'm not sure exactly why you want to take bromo after your cycle, but DHT cream can be used as a substitute for bromo under certain circumstances. It hasn't gotten much publicity, but its used to shrink gyno non-surgically. Its also used to stimulate sex drive, and some have reported an increase in penis size while using it.

Don't get any on your girlfriend, though...

:)
 
I was trying to explain why cabergoline/bromo may not be a good idea during the cycle since androgens lower PRL, while it seems to me that you're trying to prove that hypoprolactinemia may not negatively affect your HPTA ?

Some of the studies I've posted show lowered PRL, some no effect, but none indicate elevated PRL.
Unfortunatley there's no info about their estradiol level..

PRL is also important for immune function so depressing it too much is not a good idea...


A low dose which Frack plans to use during the cycle probably wouldn't have a negative impact on HPTA, but it's just not necessary since elevated PRL is not an issue in presence of high androgen levels.

I agree that studies which examine the effect of hypoPRL on HPTA are contradicting.






Here's what Lyle McDonald said about it:


The Direct Research on Bromocriptine, Testosterone and Other Hormones

In reporting the results of the Oseko et. al. (1) study which showed a decrease in testosterone with chronic bromocriptine use, a number of internet pundits have managed to avoid several other papers showing different results. In this section, I want to address each in some detail. I should note that all of these studies were done in normal, otherwise healthy males (with one exception) since that's the group we're really concerned with.

I'll summarize in a table below for easier reading. For reasons you'll see in a second, I'm going to look at them from shortest to longest duration and I'll give as much information as the studies themselves gave. You'll see that, in many cases, it's somewhat incomplete which makes drawing conclusions a bit tough.

In one study (3), Jacobs et. al. gave methysergide throughout the day to inhibit prolactin release for one day. No effect on testosterone levels were noted. In another (4), 6 males were given 2.5 mg of bromocriptine at night for 3 days. Testosterone levels increased in direct relationship to the decrease in prolactin. The same study increased prolactin levels with the drug sulpiride and noted a decrease in testosterone levels.

Lacritz et. al. (5) gave 5 males 2.5 mg of bromocriptine at night for 6 days. There was no change in testosterone. Coiro et. al. (6) gave 11 males 5 mg of bromocriptine in divided doses for 7 days; there was no change in testosterone levels. Martikainen et. al. (7) tested both decreased and increased prolactin in their study in response to a hCG test. Sulpiride was used to increase prolactin for 6 days and testosterone levels were increased although it was non-significant. Bromocriptine was then given to 7 males, at 2.5 mg for 3 days followed by 5 mg for 10 days in divided doses. No change in testosterone levels occurred in response to lowered prolactin.

In the first Oseko et. al. study, 5 normal men, aged 20 to 35 years of age were given 5 mg of bromocriptine per day to reduce prolactin levels for a period of 8 weeks. I want to note that the paper did not indicate when the bromocriptine was given. It can be safely assumed that it was either given all at night or in divided doses as that would tend to have the greatest overall effect on prolactin.

A testosterone stimulation test (via the injection of human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation or hCG) was performed at 2 week intervals during the study. Measurements of basal testosterone, prolactin, leutinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were also made. As expected, prolactin was reduced to the low end of the normal range. Levels of LH and FSH did not change during the study. However, both basal levels of testosterone and hCH stimulated testosterone levels were reduced in all subjects at all time points (2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks).

In a related study (8), Oseko et. al. looked at the LH release from the pituitary gland in response to GnRH injection after 8 weeks of bromocriptine treatment. They showed that LH release was not affected by bromocriptine. So any effect of bromocriptine on testosterone levels in reference 7 was most likely an effect at the testes themselves.

Finally, Glatthaar et. al. (9) gave 7.5 mg of bromocriptine (timing was not indicated) in 10 males who had normal prolactin levels but were infertile. The bromocriptine was given for 4 months and no change in testosterone levels was noted. These studies are summarized in table 1 below.


Frankly, I can't make any more sense out of this data than I imagine the people reading it can. Out of 8 studies, 7 of which measured testosterone levels, one showed a decrease, two showed an increase and most showed no effect (I should mention that there were one or two additional studies that I couldn't obtain at the library but I wanted to get this article out instead of waiting on them). Hardly a clear-cut case.

I put them in order from shortest to longest to see if there was any clear effect of duration. That is, while bromocriptine might have one effect in the short-term, longer-term effects might be different. Unfortunately, the last study by Glatthaar throws that for a loop; it was the longest of them all with the highest dose of bromocriptine and showed no change in testosterone. Of course, since these were infertile men, it's possible that there was already some other defect present, so the bromocriptine wasn't having any additional effect. And one study in the 70's suggested a linkage between below normal prolactin and low-testosterone in infertile men (10). As well, because of a lack of information in the full studies, there's no apparent pattern in the timing of the bromocriptine. I'm going to talk about a few other things but I'll come back to this.


References cited

1. Oseko, F. et. al. Effects of chronic bromocriptine-induced hypoprolactinemia on plasma testosterone responses to human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation in normal men. Fertil Steril (1991) 55: 355-357.

2. Balint Kacsoh. Endocrine Physiology. McGraw Hill Publishing, 2000.

3. Jacobs, LS. et. al. Failure of nocturnal prolactin supression by methysergide to entrain changes in testosterone in normal men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1978) 46: 561-566.

4. Nakagawa K et. al. Relationship of changes in serum concentrations of prolactin and testosterone during dopaminergic modulation in males. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1982 17:345-52.

5. Lackritz, RM and A. Bartke. The effect of prolactin on androgen response to human chorionic gonadotropin in normal men. Fertil Steril (1980) 34: 140-143.

6. Coiro V. et. al. Restoration of normal gonadotropin responses to naloxone by chronic bromocriptine treatment in elderly men. Horm Res (1991) 36: 36-40.

7. Martikainen H. and R. Vihko. hCG-stimulaton of testicular steroidogenesis during induced hyper- and hypoprolactinemia in man. Clinical Endocrinology (1982) 16: 227-234.

8. Oseko F. et. al. Bromocriptine effects on plasma leutinizing hormone and its responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in normal men. Life Sciences (1993) 52: 1805-1807.

9. Glatthaar, C. et. al. pituitary function in normoprolactinaemic infertile men receiving bromocriptine. Clinical Endocrinology (Oxf.) (1980) 13: 455-459.

10. Pierrepoint, CG. et. al. Prolactin and testosterone levels in the plasma of fertile and infertile men. J Endocrinology (1978) 76: 171-172.

11. Rubin, RT. et. al. Prolactin-related testosterone secretion in normal adult men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab (1976) 42: 112-116.

12. Bartke A. et. al. Effects of physiological and abnormally elevated prolactin levels on the pituitary-testicular axis. Med Biol 1986;63(5-6):264-72

13. Saez JM. Leydig cells: endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine regulation. Endocr Rev. 1994 Oct;15(5):574-626.

14. Magrini B. et. al. Study on the relationship between plasma prolactin levels and androgen metabolism in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1976 Oct;43(4):944-7

15. Linkowski, P. et. al. Genetic and environmental influences on prolactin secretion during wake and during sleep. Am J Physiol (1998) 274: E909-E919.
 
actually DRI's + Dopminergics are preferred..IMHO... DA's produce effects that are unlike natural dopamine..

thus the reccomendation of selegine and hydergine (tryosine and n-acetyl-tyrosine may be of benefit)...

issue that is bothersome is the time of testing... daytime testing will rarely reveal a non tumorbased prolactin problem.. the nighttime surge is many fold daytime pulses (as with GH.. not odd since they are linked)

as a preventative for PRL problems Bromo is perhaps a bit too strong.. though that is why low doses are reccomended.. and seem tolerable to most.. perhaps even of great benefti (see below)

the real issue is that dopaminergics and DA's stop or reverse gyno, puffyness and nipple leakage that occur with TREN and DECA... the exact why.. is perhaps less certain..

what is certain is that some people on tren or deca cycles (no other AS) get gyno even with tamox... bromo works (as do others.. some perhaps less harsh.. though with .625mg.. seems tolerable to most)..

a problem with the studies RE test production is the HIGH dosages... those are prolactin tumor treatment dosages.. lower ones are probably needed (as is shown through anecdotal use)...

the impact of those lower dosages.. has not been looked at clinically..
 
macrophage69alpha said:
[Bthe real issue is that dopaminergics and DA's stop or reverse gyno, puffyness and nipple leakage that occur with TREN and DECA... the exact why.. is perhaps less certain..

what is certain is that some people on tren or deca cycles (no other AS) get gyno even with tamox... bromo works (as do others.. some perhaps less harsh.. though with .625mg.. seems tolerable to most)..

a problem with the studies RE test production is the HIGH dosages... those are prolactin tumor treatment dosages.. lower ones are probably needed (as is shown through anecdotal use)...

the impact of those lower dosages.. has not been looked at clinically.. [/B]

EXACTLY; so then why are you always recommending these lower dosages to all who inquire about bromo? Your recommendations are baseless, bro. They are based on "anecdotal use".
But this "Anecdotal use" is taken from what survey?
Posts by elite members who may be taking a number of different compounds that you are not aware of???

Point of fact: the use of bromocriptine post cycle is completely ridiculous, and if YOU are considering it, guys, look into it further. Especially read the thread which I have posted, as MANY different studies are cited in it, and the people interpreting these studies are geniuses, to say the least (BTW, I am in no way undermining Macro's knowledge, as I know that it is vast; I am merely disagreeing with some of his views).
 
Last edited:
BTW, Frackal, the only use I have found for bromo is appetite suppression, in which it is quite effective.

I believe the "know-it-alls" of elite have blown this compound up in spite of the consensus of results various and numerous studies.
Prolactin suppression should not be a main concern in the prevention of gyno; nor should it be a factor in post-cycle HPTA recovery. Rather, estrogen is ALWAYS the main culprit. Prolactin cannot do shit for gyno in the absence of estrogen. This is the reason that ONLY nolvadex has been proven effective in the treatment of gyno (also topical DHT) via clinical trials.

If you would like, I can direct you to countless other threads regarding this issue-- threads which are based on absolute fact as is evidenced by many different clinical studies.
 
notatrase said:


EXACTLY; so then why are you always recommending these lower dosages to all who inquire about bromo? Your recommendations are baseless, bro.

no they are not.. they work.. particularly in cases where tamox does not...

the dosing recs are based on inconclusive but compelling results.. and because high dosages tend to cause sides and are generally not more effective


btw- in case you missed it, the implication is that low doses actually increase testosterone production..

why talk about bromo because it is widely available cheap and widely used.. there are a number of serms that are considerably better than tamox.. but availability is limited.. though mostly because not widely carried, not a synthesis or cost issue.


btw2- beleive that increase in natural dopamine synthesis and re uptake as well as mao-b inhibition is probably a better approach.. but considerably more complicated and more expensive.
 
notatrase said:
Rather, estrogen is ALWAYS the main culprit. Prolactin cannot do shit for gyno in the absence of estrogen.

this is a theory... and UNPROVEN.. and that has not been tested...

btw- ever hear of cross binding?

though even solely ER agonism has not be proven..


as stated MANY... MANY.. times.. the etiology of gynecomastia is UNKNOWN.. there are a NUMBER of theories as to the cause.. the most prevelant is that it is MULTI FACTORAL..
 
The problem here is that many people seem to think that it should be a general rule to take bromo/cabergoline while on deca/tren which is wrong.

I agree that gyno is a result of a combination of factors, but high estrogen/androgen (test-DHT) ratio is usually noticed in gynecomastia.

Even when PRL is considered a factor, elevated PRL will lead to high estrogen/androgen ratio which can contribute to gyno..

If someone does experience symptoms like lactation for whatever reason, he should use bromo or similar drug...

The problem with PRL is that its regulation is affected by many factors so people may attribute the PRL rise while ON to a certain AS, while it could be caused by another factor:

Causes of hyperprolactinemia :


PHYSIOLOGIC HYPERPROLACTINEMIA — Serum prolactin concentrations normally increase substantially during pregnancy and to a lesser degree in response to nipple stimulation and stress. The upper normal value for serum prolactin in most laboratories is 20 ng/mL.

Pregnancy — Serum prolactin increases throughout pregnancy, reaching a peak at delivery (show figure 1) [1]. The magnitude of the increase, however, is quite variable; in one study the mean value at term was 207 ng/mL, but the range was from 35 to 600 ng/mL [1]. The probable cause of the hyperprolactinemia is the increasing serum estradiol concentrations during pregnancy. By six weeks after delivery, estradiol secretion has decreased and the basal serum prolactin concentration is usually normal.

Nipple stimulation — Nipple stimulation increases serum prolactin concentrations, presumably via a neural pathway. The magnitude of the increase is directly proportional to the degree of preexisting lactotroph hyperplasia due to estrogen. In the first weeks postpartum, for example, the serum prolactin concentration increases up to a few hundred ng/mL above baseline in response to suckling; in contrast, several months after delivery the increase is usually less than 10 ng/mL above baseline (show figure 2) [1].


Stress — Stress of any kind, physical or psychologic, can cause an increase in the serum prolactin concentration. As with all stimuli of prolactin secretion, women have greater increases than men, presumably due to the effect of their higher serum estradiol concentrations on the lactotroph cells. The magnitude of the increase in prolactin in response to stress is small, the values rarely exceeding 40 ng/mL.

PATHOLOGIC HYPERPROLACTINEMIA — Pathologic hyperprolactinemia can be caused by the following:

• Lactotroph adenomas (prolactinomas), which are benign tumors of the lactotroph cell.

• Lactotroph hyperplasia, which can be caused by a decrease in dopaminergic inhibition of prolactin secretion and other mechanisms.

• Other conditions, including decreased clearance of prolactin.

Serum prolactin concentrations in patients who have lactotroph adenomas can range from minimally elevated to 50,000 ng/mL; in comparison, in hyperprolactinemia due to other causes, the concentrations rarely exceed 200 ng/mL [3] (show figure 3).

LACTOTROPH ADENOMAS — Lactotroph adenomas, like other pituitary adenomas, arise from monoclonal expansion of a single cell which has presumably undergone somatic mutation [4, 5]. Most adenomas that secrete prolactin and cause hyperprolactinemia are comprised solely of lactotroph cells; however, about 10 percent are comprised of both lactotroph and either somatotroph or somatomammotroph cells and therefore secrete growth hormone as well as prolactin [6].

Lactotroph adenomas are relatively common, accounting for approximately 30 to 40 percent of all clinically recognized pituitary adenomas. The diagnosis is made more frequently in women than in men, especially between the ages of 20 and 40 years [7], presumably because of the sensitivity of menses to disruption by hyperprolactinemia. However, the adenomas that occur in men are usually larger, in part due to the lack of symptoms or delay in seeking medical attention for symptoms such as erectile dysfunction [8]. In addition, the tumors in men may have an inherently greater rate of growth [8].

Most lactotroph adenomas are sporadic, but they can rarely occur as part of the multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 syndrome [9]. Almost all lactotroph tumors are benign but a rare tumor can be malignant and metastasize [10].

Prolactin secretion by lactotroph adenomas is generally characterized by both efficiency and proportionality.

• As a result of their efficiency, even microadenomas (<1 cm in diameter) typically secrete sufficient prolactin to cause hyperprolactinemia.

• As a result of their proportionality, serum prolactin concentrations tend to vary with adenoma size. Adenomas <1 cm in diameter are typically associated with serum prolactin values below 200 ng/mL; those approximately 1.0-2.0 cm in diameter with values between 200 and 1000 ng/mL; and those greater than 2.0 cm in diameter with values above 1000 ng/mL (show figure 3).

There are exceptions to both generalizations. As an example, occasional patients have a large adenoma but only modest hyperprolactinemia. Such adenomas are generally less well differentiated and respond less well to dopamine agonists than the more typical tumors. (See "Treatment of hyperprolactinemia due to lactotroph adenoma and other causes";). In other patients who have macroadenomas but only modest elevation of the reported serum prolactin concentration, the reason for the discrepancy between the large size of the adenoma and modest elevation of the prolactin concentration is due to an artefact in the immunoradiometric assay for prolactin. This artefact, called the "hook effect", can be obviated by dilution of the sera, which will allow a true assessment of the prolactin concentration [11, 12, 13].

LACTOTROPH HYPERPLASIA — Continuous stimulation or decreased inhibition of the lactotroph cells can lead to lactotroph hyperplasia, prolactin hypersecretion, and hyperprolactinemia. The best recognized mechanism by which hyperprolactinemia due to lactotroph hyperplasia occurs is interference with normal dopamine inhibition of prolactin secretion. This may occur as a result of damage to the dopaminergic neurons of the hypothalamus, pituitary stalk section, or drugs that block dopamine receptors on lactotroph cells.

Hypothalamic and pituitary disease — Any disease in or near the hypothalamus or pituitary that interferes with the secretion of dopamine or its delivery to the hypothalamus can cause hyperprolactinemia [3]. These include:

• Tumors of the hypothalamus, both benign (eg, craniopharyngiomas) and malignant (eg, metastatic breast carcinoma)

• Infiltrative diseases of the hypothalamus (eg, sarcoidosis)

• Section of the hypothalamic-pituitary stalk (eg, due to head trauma)

• Adenomas of the pituitary other than lactotroph adenomas

Drug use — Several drugs are known dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, and raise serum prolactin by that mechanism. These include antipsychotic drugs such as risperidone, phenothiazines, haloperidol [14], butyrophenones [15], metoclopramide [16], sulpiride [17], and domperidone [18]. Serum prolactin concentrations increase within hours after acute administration of these drugs and return to normal within two to four days after cessation of chronic therapy [15]. The magnitude of the elevation varies with the drug. Haloperidol, for example, raises the serum prolactin concentration by an average of 17 ng/mL, whereas risperidone may raise it by 45 to 80 ng/mL [14].

The antihypertensive drugs, methyldopa and reserpine, neither of which is commonly used now, increase prolactin secretion by a similar mechanism. Methyldopa inhibits dopamine synthesis [19], while reserpine inhibits dopamine storage [20].

Verapamil may raise serum prolactin concentrations [21], but other calcium channel blockers do not [22]. The mechanism of this verapamil-induced increase is not known. Hyperprolactinemia occurred in 8.6 percent of 449 men taking verapamil in one report, as compared with only 3 percent of control men [23]. The elevated serum prolactin concentration persisted during continued drug administration in 14 of 15 men, and returned to normal in all 9 after the drug was stopped.

Estrogen — Estrogen increases prolactin secretion proportionate to the degree of estrogenization. Amounts of estrogen that are physiologic for a woman increase the basal serum prolactin concentration minimally, but explain the greater prolactin response of women (compared with men) to almost all physiologic stimuli [24]. Greater amounts of estrogen, such as occur in pregnancy, increase basal serum prolactin concentrations, as described above.

The mechanism by which estrogen stimulates prolactin secretion appears to involve binding of estrogen to the estrogen receptor, which then binds to an estrogen response element on the prolactin gene, in the lactotroph cell of the pituitary [25, 26].

Hypothyroidism — Hypothyroidism predisposes to hyperprolactinemia. However, basal serum prolactin concentrations are normal in most hypothyroid patients [27], and only the serum prolactin response to stimuli, such as TRH (thyrotropin-releasing hormone), is increased [28]. In the few hypothyroid patients who have elevated basal serum prolactin concentrations, the values return to normal when the hypothyroidism is corrected [29, 30]. It is important to recognize hypothyroidism as a potential cause of an enlarged pituitary gland (due to thyrotroph hyperplasia, lactotroph hyperplasia, or both) and hyperprolactinemia, and not to confuse this entity with a lactotroph adenoma.

The mechanism of hyperprolactinemia in hypothyroidism is not known. Both enhanced hypothalamic synthesis of TRH and increased pituitary responsiveness to TRH have been described [28].

Chest wall injury — Chest wall injuries, such as severe burns, increase prolactin secretion, presumably due to a neural mechanism similar to that of suckling [31].

Chronic renal failure — The serum prolactin concentration is high in patients who have chronic renal failure and returns to normal after renal transplantation [32]. The major mechanism is a three-fold increase in prolactin secretion, and there is a one-third decrease in metabolic clearance rate [33].

OTHER CAUSES OF HYPERPROLACTINEMIA

Idiopathic hyperprolactinemia — In a substantial number of patients whose serum prolactin concentration is between 20 and 100 ng/mL, no cause can be found. Although many of these patients may have undetectable lactotroph microadenomas, in most of them the serum prolactin concentrations change little during follow-up for several years [34, 35, 36]. In one report, for example, only 1 of 59 patients who were followed for an average of 6.5 years developed a detectable pituitary adenoma and about 20 percent had a normal serum prolactin concentration when it was last measured [36].

Decreased clearance of prolactin — There are two settings in which hyperprolactinemia is caused by decreased clearance of prolactin:

• Chronic renal failure — Hyperprolactinemia is common in patients with end-stage renal failure and improves after renal transplantation [32, 33].

• Big prolactin — The most common form of prolactin in serum is 23 kD in size and is not glycosylated, but a small amount of a 25 kD glycosylated form can also be detected. In rare cases, glycosylated prolactin, which appears to circulate in aggregates, accounts for most of the prolactin [37]. In this situation the prolactin has been called "big prolactin" and the condition referred to as "macroprolactinemia." The elevated serum prolactin concentration in these patients can be distinguished from hyperprolactinemia of other causes by gel filtration or polyethylene glycol precipitation [38]. In one series of 1,106 patients with hyperprolactinemia, approximately 10 percent had macroprolactinemia [39].

The clinical manifestations of macroprolactinemia were described in a series of 55 women ages 18 to 55. None had a history of amenorrhea, eight had oligomenorrhea before age 40, and one had galactorrhea. All subjects had pituitary imaging; no macroadenomas and four microadenomas were seen (consistent with the prevalence of incidentalomas in the normal population). Thus, macroprolactinemia appears to be a benign clinical condition [40].

Equally rare is a raised serum prolactin level due to complexing of normal-sized prolactin with circulating prolactin antibodies [41]. In this situation, the free prolactin concentration is normal and causes no biologic abnormalities.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
References

1 Tyson, JE, Ito, P, Guyda, H, et al. Studies of prolactin in human pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1972; 113:14.
2 Jarrell, J, Franks, S, McInnes, R, et al. Breast examination does not elevate serum prolactin. Fertil Steril 1980; 33:49.
3 Kleinberg, DL, Noel, GL, Frantz, AG. Galactorrhea: A study of 235 cases, including 48 with pituitary tumors. N Engl J Med 1977; 296:589.
4 Alexander, JM, Biller, BMK, Bikkal, H, et al. Clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumors are monoclonal in origin. J Clin Invest 1990; 86:336.
5 Herman, V, Fagin, J, Gonsky, R, et al. Clonal origin of pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990; 71:1427.
6 Corenblum, B, Sirek, AMT, Horvath, E, et al. Human mixed somatotrophic and lactotrophic pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1976; 42:857.
7 Mindermann, T, Wilson, CB. Age-related and gender-related occurrence of pituitary adenomas. Clin Endocrinol 1994; 41:359.
8 Delgrange, E, Trouillas, J, Maiter, D, et al. Sex-related difference in the growth of prolactinomas: A clinical and proliferation marker study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82:2102.
9 Prosser, PR, Karam, JH, Townsend, JJ, et al. Prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas in multiple endocrine adenomatosis, type I. Ann Intern Med 1979; 91:41.
10 Walker, JD, Grossman, A, Anderson, JV, et al. Malignant prolactinoma with extracranial metastases: A report of three cases. Clin Endocrinol 1993; 38:411.
11 Petakov, MS, Damjanovic, SS, Nikolic-Durovic, MM, et al. Pituitary adenomas secreting large amounts of prolactin may give false low values in immunoradiometric assays. The hook effect. J Endocrinol Invest 1998; 21:184.
12 St-Jean, E, Blain, F, Comtois, R. High prolactin levels may be missed by immunoradiometric assay in patients with macroprolactinomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1996; 44:305.
13 Barkan, AL, Chandler, WF. Giant pituitary prolactinoma with falsely low serum prolactin: The pitfall of the "high-dose hook effect." Neurosurgery 1998; 42:913.
14 David, SR, Taylor, CC, Kinon, BJ, Breier, A. The effects of olanzapine, rispiridone, and haloperiodol on plasma prolactin levels in patients with schizophrenia. Clin Ther 2000; 22:1085.
15 De Rivera, JL, Lal, S, Ettigi, P, et al. Effect of acute and chronic neuroleptic therapy on serum prolactin levels in men and women of different age groups. Clin Endocrinol 1976; 5:273.
16 McCallum, RW, Sowers, JR, Hershman, JM, et al. Metoclopramide stimulates prolactin secretion in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1976; 42:1148.
17 Mancini, AM, Guitelman, A, Vargas, CA, et al. Effect of sulpiride on serum prolactin levels in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1976; 42:181.
18 Sowers, JR, Sharp, B, McCallum, RW. Effect of domperidone, an extracerebral inhibitor of dopamine receptors, on thyrotropin, prolactin, renin, aldosterone, and 18-hydroxycorticosterone secretion in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1982; 54:869.
19 Steiner, J, Cassar, J, Mashiter, K, et al. Effect of methyldopa on prolactin and growth hormone. Br Med J 1976; 1:1186.
20 Lee, PA, Kelly, MR, Wallin, JD. Increased prolactin levels during reserpine treatment of hypertensive patients. JAMA 1976; 235:2316.
21 Fearrington, EL, Rand, CH, Rose, JD. Hyperprolactinemia-galactorrhea induced by verapamil. Am J Cardiol 1983; 51:1466.
22 Veldhuis, JD, Borges, JLC, Drake, CR. Divergent influences of the structurally dissimilar calcium entry blockers, diltiazem and verapamil, on the thyrotropin- and gonadotropin-releasing hormone-stimulated anterior pituitary hormone secretion in man. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985; 60:144.
23 Romeo, JH, Dombrowski, R, Kwak, YS, et al. Hyperprolactinemia and verapamil: Prevalence and potential association with hypogonadism in men. Clin Endocrinol 1996; 45:571.
24 Frantz, AG. Prolactin. N Engl J Med 1978; 298:201.
25 Murdoch, FE, Byrne, LM, Ariazi, EA, et al. Estrogen receptor binding to DNA: affinity for nonpalindromic elements from the rat prolactin gene. Biochemistry 1995; 34:9144.
26 Malayer, JR, Gorski, J. The role of estrogen receptor in modulation of chromatin conformation in the 5' flanking region of the rat prolactin gene. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1995; 113:145.
27 Honbo, KS, Van Herle, AJ, Kellett, KA. Serum prolactin levels in untreated primary hypothyroidism. Am J Med 1978; 64:782.
28 Snyder, PJ, Jacobs, LS, Utiger, RD, Daughaday, WH. Thyroid hormone inhibition of the prolactin response to thyrotropin releasing hormone. J Clin Invest 1973; 52:2324.
29 Groff, TR, Shulkin, BL, Utiger, RD, Talbert, LM. Amenorrhea-galactorrhea, hyperprolactinemia, and suprasellar pituitary enlargement as presenting features of primary hypothyroidism. Obstet Gynecol 1984; 63:86S.
30 Grubb, MR, Chakeres, D, Malarkey, WB. Patients with primary hypothyroidism presenting as prolactinomas. Am J Med 1987; 83:765.
31 Morley, JE, Hodgkinson, DH, Kalk, WJ. Galactorrhea and hyperprolactinemia associated with chest wall injury. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1977; 45:931.
32 Lim, VS, Kathpalia, SC, Frohman, LA. Hyperprolactinemia and impaired pituitary response to suppression and stimulation in chronic renal failure: Reversal after transplantation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1979; 48:101.
33 Sievertsen, GD, Lim, VS, Nakawatase, C, Frohman, LA. Metabolic clearance and secretion rates of human prolactin in normal subjects and patients with chronic renal failure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1980; 50:846.
34 Schlechte, J, Dolan, K, Sherman, B, et al. The natural history of untreated hyperprolactinemia: A prospective analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989; 68:412.
35 Martin, TL, Kim, M, Malarkey, WB. The natural history of idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1985; 60:855.
36 Sluijmer, AV, Lappöhn, RE. Clinical history and outcome of 59 patients with idiopathic hyperprolactinemia. Fertil Steril 1992; 58:72.
37 Carlson, HE, Markoff, E, Lee, DW. On the nature of serum prolactin in two patients with macroprolactinemia. Fertil Steril 1992; 58:78.
38 Olukoga, AO, Kane, JW. Macroprolactinaemia: validation and application of the polyethylene glycol precipitation test and clinical characterization of the condition. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 1999; 51:119.
39 Vallette-Kasic, S, Morange-Ramos, I, Selim, A, et al. Macroprolactinemia revisited: a study on 106 patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87:581.
40 Leslie, H, Courtney, CH, Bell, PM, et al. Laboratory and clinical experience in 55 patients with macroprolactinemia identified by a simple polyethylene glycol precipitation method. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:2743.
41 Hattori, N, Inagaki, C. Anti-prolactin (PRL) autoantibodies cause asymptomatic hyperprolactinemia: bioassay and clearance studies of PRL-immunoglobulin G complex. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997; 82:3107.




Here's some info from:

GYNECOMASTIA: ETIOLOGY, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT
Chapter 14 - Gladys E. Palomeno, MD, and Ronald S. Swerdloff, MD


ESTROGEN, GH AND IGF-1, PROGESTERONE, & PROLACTIN

Estrogen and progesterone act in an integrative fashion to stimulate normal adult female breast development. Estrogen, acting through its ER a receptor, promotes duct growth, while progesterone, also acting through its receptor (PR), supports alveolar development (13). This is demonstrated by experiments in ER a knockout mice which display grossly impaired ductal development, whereas the PR knockout mice possess significant ductal development, but lack alveolar differentiation (25,6).

Although estrogens and progestogens are vital to mammary growth, they are ineffective in the absence of anterior pituitary hormones (13). Thus, neither estrogen alone nor estrogen plus progesterone can sustain breast development without other mediators, such as GH and IGF-1, as confirmed by studies involving the administration of estrogen and GH to hypophysectomized and oophorectomized female rats, which resulted in breast ductal development. The GH effects on ductal growth are mediated through stimulation of IGF-1. This is demonstrated by studies of estrogen and GH administration to IGF-1 knockout rats that showed significantly decreased mammary development when compared to age-matched IGF-1- intact controls. Combined estrogen and IGF-1 treatment in these IGF-1 knockout rats restored mammary growth. (21, 36). In addition, Walden et al. demonstrated that GH-stimulated production of IGF-1 mRNA in the mammary gland itself, suggesting that IGF-1 production in the stromal compartment of the mammary gland acts locally to promote breast development (43). Furthermore, other data indicates that estrogen promotes GH secretion and increased GH levels, stimulating the production of IGF-1, which synergizes with estrogen to induce ductal development.

Like estrogen, progesterone has minimal effects in breast development without concomitant anterior pituitary hormones; again indicating that progesterone interacts closely with pituitary hormones. For example, prolonged treatment of dogs with progestogens such as depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or with proligestone caused increased GH and IGF-1 levels, suggesting that progesterone may also have an effect on GH secretion (29). In addition, clinical studies have correlated maximal cell proliferation to specific phases in the female menstrual cycle. For example, maximal proliferation occurs not during the follicular phase when estrogens reach peak levels and progesterone is low (less than 1 ng/mL[3.1nmol}), but rather, it occurs during the luteal phase when progesterone reaches levels of 10-20 ng/mL (31- 62nmol) and estrogen levels are two to three times lower than in the follicular phase (38). Furthermore, immunohistochemical studies of ER and PR showed that the highest percentage of proliferating cells, found almost exclusively in the type 1 lobules, contained the highest percentage of ER and PR positive cells (38). Similarly, there is immunocytological presence of ER, PR, and androgen receptors (AR) in gynecomastia and male breast carcinoma. ER, PR and AR expression was observed in 100% (30/30) of gynecomastia cases (37). Given these data and the fact that PR knockout mice lack alveolar development in breast tissue, it appears as if progesterone, analogous to estrogen, may increase GH secretion and act through its receptor on mammary tissue to enhance breast development, specifically alveolar differentiation (25, 16).

Prolactin is another anterior pituitary hormone integral to breast development. Prolactin is not only secreted by the pituitary gland but may be produced in normal mammary tissue epithelial cells and breast tumors. (39, 23). Prolactin stimulates epithelial cell proliferation only in the presence of estrogen and enhances lobulo-alveolar differentiation only with concomitant progesterone.
 
In some cases secretion from mammary glands can occur even when PRL level seems to be normal (No info about PRL peaks during sleep), & bromo can stop the secretion:


Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 1983 Jul;131(7):455-7 Related Articles, Links


[Plasma prolactin levels and pubertal gynecomastia]

[Article in German]

Butenandt O.

Twenty-three boys with pubertal gynecomastia had higher mean levels of prolactin than boys of similar development but without gynecomastia (10.1 vs. 6.2 ng/ml). In girls of comparable pubertal staging prolactin level was 12.3 ng/ml. In boys no hyperprolactinemia was found, not even after stimulation with TRH, prolactin levels were not elevated in two boys with secreting mammary glands. Therapy with bromocriptine stopped the secretion. During therapy, prolactin levels could not be raised by stimulation. The results contradict the hypothesis that prolactin is involved in the development of gynecomastia.
 
I'm pretty sure DHT cream is an effective treatment for all types of gynoclamastia. Even gyno that has been there awhile can show improvement.

Its not talked about much, but maybe that's because of the hairloss concern, which could be addressed with anti-DHT hair cream.

Still, I think most people would prefer a thinning hair line over breasts :)
 
Big Johnson said:
I'm pretty sure DHT cream is an effective treatment for all types of gynoclamastia. Even gyno that has been there awhile can show improvement.

Its not talked about much, but maybe that's because of the hairloss concern, which could be addressed with anti-DHT hair cream.

Still, I think most people would prefer a thinning hair line over breasts :)

DHT has antiestrogenic & A.I. properties, it will also contribute to increased androgen/estrogen ratio, etc...

It can also suppress HPTA so it's not the best choice IMO...
 
Big Johnson said:
I'm pretty sure DHT cream is an effective treatment for all types of gynoclamastia. Even gyno that has been there awhile can show improvement.

Its not talked about much, but maybe that's because of the hairloss concern, which could be addressed with anti-DHT hair cream.

Still, I think most people would prefer a thinning hair line over breasts :)

Good point, BJ (I mean big johnson, LOL). Andractim has done wonders on my gyno. As hhajdo said, however, it is quite inhibitory to the HPTA and so is best used on cycle. As far as causing baldness, I have thin hair that is ready to fall out at any second, but the DHT gel has worsened this problem none.

Macro, as far as the baseless points you make with your choppy one-liners, I feel you have a lot of homework to do regarding bromo, Prl, and the certain causes of gyno.
 
Top Bottom