Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

rented Man on Fire

What I liked about it was the way he tortured and killed the bad guys. If more people did that to bad guys like what he did, there would be less crime. But the liberals couldn't handle it because you know the bad guys have feelings too.
 
curling said:
But the liberals couldn't handle it because you know the bad guys have feelings too.

I'm liberal. Kill the bad guys. "do you know who I am?" blah, blah, ooops lost another finger.
 
RottenWillow said:
I'm liberal. Kill the bad guys. "do you know who I am?" blah, blah, ooops lost another finger.

Yea, that was bad ass. How can you be liberal if you believe in the death penalty? Maybe your more conservative than you thought.
 
curling said:
Yea, that was bad ass. How can you be liberal if you believe in the death penalty? Maybe your more conservative than you thought.

i'd probably be considered liberal and i'm 100% for the death penalty.
 
You kill, you die. You rape, you die. You fuck with the sanctity of kids, you die.
 
curling said:
How can you be liberal if you believe in the death penalty? Maybe your more conservative than you thought.

I am and I do but screw the electric chair.....I think they should make an electric couch and zap 2-3 of them at once.
 
Did you know that under federal mandatory sentencing guidelines the average first time non-violent drug offender receives more jail time than a rapist or child molestor. We sure do have our priorities straight in this country.
 
JavaGuru said:
Did you know that under federal mandatory sentencing guidelines the average first time non-violent drug offender receives more jail time than a rapist or child molestor. We sure do have our priorities straight in this country.

This is stupid what kind of dumb ass lawyers are making these type of sentencing decisions? I say we shoot them first then elect new ones and I bet the new ones would do a better job. This kindof stuff pisses me off and makes me want to run for President.
 
I dont agree with our drug laws either.. it was a war that was lost long ago... and only still exists to feed the anti-drug industry and to m,ake stupid housewives feel better when their kid OD's on X.. like our government is "trying"..

total bullshit.. if people want to fuck up their bodies.. it sghould be their business NOT the governments.. Hell.. they sure dont have a problem with it as long as you got a scrip.. to feed their favortie contributor..(the pharm industry)
 
The Federal Mandatory sentencing guidelines were passed by your elected officials as part of the war on drugs. The "tough on crime" anti-drug platform has been adopted by both parties. This stuff gets passed so they can run adds about how they are protecting children and getting criminals off the streets, voting against it would have their opponents running adds about how they opposed legislation to protect our children from drugs.

What's interesting is that 2/3 of federal judges have exercised their right to refuse hearing drug cases because they feel the guidelines are too harsh. History has shown that a "war on drugs" only creates large, violent and extremely welathy criminal organizations that corrupt law enforcement and judges. It does nothing to effectively curtail its use.
 
Ok, I understand why they are so heavy on the sentencing for drugs but why are they so laxed on the sentencing for rape and child abuse? That is what is blowing my mind.
 
Top Bottom