Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Receptor bombing /blitz

chazk

New member
Just curious if any one has tried this or is willing to give it a try.

It would be a 12 week cycle rotating drugs every 3 weeks fast acting injects and orals . To bomb the recpetor then re bomb it again every 3 weeks with a different drug.

weeks 1-3
anavar 40mg ed
test prop 75mg eod

weeks 3-6
winstrol 50mg ed
tren ace 75mg eod

weeks 6-9
tbol 40mg ed
masteron 75mg ed

Its all fast acting drugs so you should get a big bang in 3 weeks seeing great results then once the drug builds up and you see a tolarance .Bam switch the drugs get the full effects of 2 more drugs .Build up resistance once more swich off and end the last 3 weeks with 2 totally diff drugs.

wont work with long esters but should be great with short esters.
its a long time to be on orals but the anavar at the lower dose should be ok so it really only like being on orals for the last 6 weeks.

Any feed back on this?
My theory is that you could use the drugs take less of each drug see its full effects (or close to it) by the end of week 3.then keep shocking the recpetors with the new drugs to keep gaining during the cycle. We all have seen a wall during the middle of a cycle where you gain gain gain then stop or slows down be it week 6-8 of a longer cycle..This way with the rotation you should see no wall and keep going gaining untill the end of the cycle.
 
Duchaine tried a similar protocol. He spoke about it in the first issue of "Pump" magazine.
 
chazk said:
Just curious if any one has tried this or is willing to give it a try.
Any feed back on this?
My theory is that you could use the drugs take less of each drug see its full effects (or close to it) by the end of week 3.then keep shocking the recpetors with the new drugs to keep gaining during the cycle. We all have seen a wall during the middle of a cycle where you gain gain gain then stop or slows down be it week 6-8 of a longer cycle..This way with the rotation you should see no wall and keep going gaining untill the end of the cycle.

Even Dan admitted this was just an interesting theory. My theory is that Mother Nuture isn't so easily fooled. It's not like you'll be retaining nitrogen and circualting testosterone and all of a sudden your body wil be "suprised" into doing it more because you used a different compound. Using that line of thinking, if you ate nothing but tuna and then switched to flounder, your body would retain more of the protein because it's from a different source. Who knows? Maybe it will.

That "wall" you hit was the cue the old timers used to go off. But if the intention is to stay on -- try anything.
 
yea seemed interesting that it may work or looks good on paper .but your right will the body reconize the drugs as new and change its recpetors to suck up the new drugs as if it were just seeing steroids for the first time .prob not.

just wondered if anyone has tried it.
thanks nelson for the response
 
I dont know Ive been doing that with long esters and with orals and keep gaining weight.So far I am up almost 30lbs from 180 lean on a 5'6" small boned frame I am 205 still fairly lean.I switched abombs at 50mg for deca and started gaining once again.The base drugs I am using is a homebrew blend of Equipose and cyp.Each ml contains 200mg of each doing 400-600mg of each per week and just switching out the third drug in the stack every 8-12 weeks.I am also using gh at 4ius through out.My goal is to break into the light heavy weight class as a novice this year.
 
I think that receptor regulation won't be the deciding factor but rather the unique gene transcription from the androgen response element...in other words, it'll likely work, but not any moreso than a typical cycle.
 
even on short esters 3 weeks isnt enough time to elicit maximal gains, i do have less experience with short esters though.. id see more of a benefit say.. running test throughout.. and just changing the other compound every 4-5 weeks, not changing everything all together, i think your libido would go to shit running for example tren/winstrol only
 
gymratforlife said:
I dont know Ive been doing that with long esters and with orals and keep gaining weight.So far I am up almost 30lbs from 180 lean on a 5'6" small boned frame I am 205 still fairly lean.I switched abombs at 50mg for deca and started gaining once again.The base drugs I am using is a homebrew blend of Equipose and cyp.Each ml contains 200mg of each doing 400-600mg of each per week and just switching out the third drug in the stack every 8-12 weeks.I am also using gh at 4ius through out.My goal is to break into the light heavy weight class as a novice this year.

Not to suck the joy out of your experience but if you've gone from 180 to 220 on a 5'6" frame with one cycle it's doubtful, once you're off everything, that you'd hold five pounds of extra muscle 3 months later. Even with the best PCT in the world.

Good luck with the competition.
 
The question is really "Does it work in real life"...

Bill Roberts, who definately knows his shit, wrote some kind of protocol with 2on/4off stuff going on, and even though he knows his stuff, it never worked for anyone I've ever talked to. It's acedemic-steroid-use. It's not what happens in real life.

I even did an article with someone who is pretty well-respected on steroid use (not in general, but on one site in particular) and he wasn't too happy with the fact that I used Nicotine (transdermal), for estrogen reduction and appetite suppression, with one of my female clients. But you know what? She fucking won her contest (figure), and is nationally qualified now. The guy who criticized my methods hasn't ever helped someone qualify for national status.

So what the acedemic-steroid-people want to write about and what actually works is a different story.

That's why I really liked Dan Duchaine in my teens. He was totally reckless and actually tried his theories out on himself or his athletes.
 
"That's why I really liked Dan Duchaine in my teens. He was totally reckless and actually tried his theories out on himself or his athletes."

Sounds like me :)
 
- Ross - said:
"That's why I really liked Dan Duchaine in my teens. He was totally reckless and actually tried his theories out on himself or his athletes."

Sounds like me :)

It's good to have the confidence to try things out on yourself....I think it's kind of unethical to try them out on others without doing it yourself. I used the transdermal nicotine before anyone else used it...

On the other hand, I took a HUGE chance bringing MyoGenX (the first nutritional product to contain Fadogia Aggrestis) to the market without having it tested first...

So there's got to be a balance, I think...to avoid some of the tradgedies that happened when Dan got too carried away. Still, my first book is dedicated to him...
 
i have to say this is the most ive seen you post on ef anthony the past 3 weeks that is, and all the hatred for everyone has seemed to subside so some good info can be put out
 
jmead said:
i have to say this is the most ive seen you post on ef anthony the past 3 weeks that is, and all the hatred for everyone has seemed to subside so some good info can be put out

Is that a good thing?
 
im leaning towards yes, i have yet to pass judgement yet haha.. multiple educated points of view are always welcomed and appreciated, just not used to seeing your name on so many different posts so often

post on.
 
Top Bottom