Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below carrera104
New member
i was wondering guys if adding primo to hgh cycle would increase the muscle mas and for how long i should run it, and at what dose...
Primo.....?
- Thread starter carrera104
- Start date
cgar1228
New member
It's quite obvious that you need to do some more reading about Primo and the proper things to cycle with it. First, you don't "cycle" HGH. Secondly if you want something to go with your Primo why not start with the MOST necessary building block of any cycle.....TESTOSTERONE!!!! It sounds like you don't know squat so please do yourself a BIG favor and read up for a few months about different cycles, PCT, and trouble-shooting ON-cycle problems; then come back when you can at least talk the talk.
^ That.
A
ALIN
Guest
Primo is a good AAS than can increase lean body mass. Most need at least 500mg+ per week for good results.
I would stack the HGH with some testosterone.
carrera104
New member
It's quite obvious that you need to do some more reading about Primo and the proper things to cycle with it. First, you don't "cycle" HGH. Secondly if you want something to go with your Primo why not start with the MOST necessary building block of any cycle.....TESTOSTERONE!!!! It sounds like you don't know squat so please do yourself a BIG favor and read up for a few months about different cycles, PCT, and trouble-shooting ON-cycle problems; then come back when you can at least talk the talk.
you are mistaking..... i have been reading forever, the reason i asked that question is that primo mass is more keep able.....do your self a big favor and stop judging people...
carrera104
New member
thanks
carrera104
New member
thank you
cgar1228
New member
you are mistaking..... i have been reading forever, the reason i asked that question is that primo mass is more keep able.....do your self a big favor and stop judging people...
if you had ANY clue you wouldn't be asking how long to run a primo cycle. i only judged you based on what you had written and the way you proposed your question. You basically asked if Primo would increase muscle mass??!!??
WTF Of coarse it will, IT'S A STEROID!!!! You may THINK you've done a lot of reading but if you had you wouldn't have asked the question in the manner you did. bomb mf 
U
UA_Iron
Guest
Why wouldnt it increase muscle mass?
Primo at usable doses is going to cost as much as your HGH "cycle" if not more. I wouldnt bother running HGH for anything under 6 months and 4iu/day
Primo at usable doses is going to cost as much as your HGH "cycle" if not more. I wouldnt bother running HGH for anything under 6 months and 4iu/day
carrera you really need to konw what you are doing with all of this stuff but most especially with HGH. I think that is what cgar is basically saying. The man knows his shit having learned it the hard way. I know that you think you have read and Im not saying that you have not. But I also know that this shit is deadly serious stuff to be dealing with. If you have not bought your stuff yet why dont you do some reading on GHRP-2 of -6. They are both more user friendly then HGH, cost less and will give pretty much the same results.
Dont get offended from these guys giving you advice as they are just looking out for you and best of luck to you.
Dont get offended from these guys giving you advice as they are just looking out for you and best of luck to you.
I'm going to take issue with that. Scherring's own data showed that when primobolan was used in place of testosterone for TRT, estrogen levels got too low and men lost their libido.
Since primo cycles generally need 10+ weeks to show results and the typical man doesn't want to be without his libido for that long, I would recommend at least a small (100mg/wk) dosage of testosterone with a primo cycle.
rambleon
New member
I did not recommend it for hrt use. There is a huge difference in duration here. If we're talking a cycle of some weeks i do not believe this will be an issue for most. The effect u're describing would be some time in developing. Besides i disagree that more than 10 weeks are needed to get results with primo. That all depend on just how much growth u define as 'results'. Ask Nelson for his opinion on this and he'll tell u that a 6 week primo alone run is ideal for a firsttimer.
carrera104
New member
carrera104
New member
actually i bought the stuff and i am in second week, the reason why i did hgh is due to my high bf and no matter what i did before i was not succeed to reduce that.
I am just using 4iu's a day and i will run it for 6 months
It takes less than 3 weeks on-cycle for your endogenous testosterone level to go essentially to zero.
I did it my first cycle where I ran d-bol only for 6 weeks. Had no libido from week 4-9. That was the last cycle I ran without testosterone.
i dont see why someone under 45 needs to mess with HGH, i never recommend it to lifters. thats my position
i just dont think its necessary to reach your goals or worth the cost..
WinnyPumps
New member
Anyone under 45? GH has many many benefits to running it at any age. Just for example many great athletes have taken it for many reasons. I know a few people personally who have ran it with their trt and it works wonders. So I have to say you are incorrect in that assumption.
rambleon
New member
That would depend on how supressive the cycle is and primo is way less supressive than dbol. Besides u were talking about low estro not test and if the mechanism behind the lowering of estro is test production supression i'd suggest that there would be a time lag involved. U might be very sensitive to supression but some people can use harsher compounds than primo without loss of libido if they don't stay on too long. I'm on hrt now but wayback when i could run winny without test and still function sexually.
yup they sure have.. but they are athletes. if you are getting paid big money then yeah it is worth it.. HGH is awesome stuff pure and simple.
but for the average lifter who wants to go beyond their genetic potential you can go with test + primo for example and save yourself a lot of money.
we aren't allowed to talk about cost on here but I will say to run HGH for 6 months would be an awful lot of money.. money that could of been spent on multiple 10 or 12 week cycles over the course of several years.
when i get over 50 i will talk to a doctor about HGH if knock on wood I have the funds to afford it, but in the mean time I see no reason to mess with it personally and i wouldn't recommend anyone mess with it unless they really really know what they are doing and have the money to afford it
WinnyPumps
New member
Yes you have a point in regards to the expenses and that Test/Primo is a great cycle, no doubt. But if someone can afford GH along with Test/Primo or Test/Var then I would certainly recommend it. You are basically not recommending it due to the price of GH.
carrera104
New member
thanks
know a guy who is about 30 who looks absolutely ridiculous.. he is on prescribed GH. the thing is he is a multi-millionaire so he doesn't care about cost.
if i was in his shoes thats exactly what i would do... definately see a doc who knows what they are doing and can put me on a good HGH plan.
WinnyPumps
New member
Amen to that brotha!
