sensational
New member
So, it has long been said that primo helps build muscle in a calorie restricted environment. What corroborates this? Is it bro-ology, or science?
Is primo really better than, say, trenbolone at adding mass in a calorie restricted environment?
What I am looking for from this thread are the ideal conditions and goal sets to use primo in, and what kind of science or bro-ology backs this up.
If something like tren can do the same thing at a lower financial cost (yes health costs should be considered too) then why is primo revered so highly?
Is it because it is rare, or used to be rare? Let us try and keep this thread relegated to personal experience and science only. No hearsay if that's possible. Thanks!
Is primo really better than, say, trenbolone at adding mass in a calorie restricted environment?
What I am looking for from this thread are the ideal conditions and goal sets to use primo in, and what kind of science or bro-ology backs this up.
If something like tren can do the same thing at a lower financial cost (yes health costs should be considered too) then why is primo revered so highly?
Is it because it is rare, or used to be rare? Let us try and keep this thread relegated to personal experience and science only. No hearsay if that's possible. Thanks!