SoKlueles said:Sir, I am rallying behind the voters
democracy
omgggggggggggg why?Not_Funny said:digger is gonna smite the snot outta you. and we will all laugh at you
I agreepintoca said:Gambino for mod. It's long overdue
gambiny but he seems to get himself into trouble alotbluepeter said:
pintoca said:Gambino for mod. It's long overdue
pintoca said:it's a wheel, Gambino seems to be the proberbial ka-mai
no its not*MissFit* said:The poll is public.. i wont vote
someone that used to post on here who looked good in a visorstilleto said:who's "gambino"?
hamstershaver said:transfer me your k before you get banded woman
omg i gave him alot of what he has nowDunk said:if she loved you she would have made you hit the 3 mill mark by now. thats fucked up Klu.
you slipped me a few hundred gs, quit acting like you gave me 1.5 milSoKlueles said:omg i gave him alot of what he has now
thats love bucko
omg i gave u what i had so hushhamstershaver said:you slipped me a few hundred gs, quit acting like you gave me 1.5 mil
Lestat said:Worst designed poll ever. Stick to POLE, you seem to handle it like a pro.
So the thread is "Petition to bring Gambino back"
Then the poll title is "Leave it alone"
Then options:
1. Yes give him his name back and disable his name changing thingy
2. no, let him change his name anytime he wants
3. hes a dork
So #3 is a given, and pointless, but that is the en vogue thing to do with polls these days, leave a 3rd option that makes no sense, isn't really funny, but everyone will pick.
So back to the first two supposedly legitimate opions.
If I select #1, what I am selecting really? Am I saying yes to the thread title of "bring Gambino back" or to the poll title of "leave it alone?" Lets say I am saying YES, bring him back, but disable his name changing ability.. fine, ok option.
Then you go to #2.. it says NO.. so if I select that I am saying NO don't bring him back? But then you go on to say "let him change his name anytime he wants"... how on earth can I vote to let him change his name anytime he wants but NOT vote for him to come back?
What an assinine poll.
Lestat said:Worst designed poll ever. Stick to POLE, you seem to handle it like a pro.
So the thread is "Petition to bring Gambino back"
Then the poll title is "Leave it alone"
Then options:
1. Yes give him his name back and disable his name changing thingy
2. no, let him change his name anytime he wants
3. hes a dork
So #3 is a given, and pointless, but that is the en vogue thing to do with polls these days, leave a 3rd option that makes no sense, isn't really funny, but everyone will pick.
So back to the first two supposedly legitimate opions.
If I select #1, what I am selecting really? Am I saying yes to the thread title of "bring Gambino back" or to the poll title of "leave it alone?" Lets say I am saying YES, bring him back, but disable his name changing ability.. fine, ok option.
Then you go to #2.. it says NO.. so if I select that I am saying NO don't bring him back? But then you go on to say "let him change his name anytime he wants"... how on earth can I vote to let him change his name anytime he wants but NOT vote for him to come back?
What an assinine poll.
digger said:Not to inject a serious note into this or anything, but just to clear things up... The Ed Norton avatar had nothing to do with it. We had a bro on a timeout. Making alters when you're on a timeout leads to a longer timeout, or a permanent ban.
Yeah, maybe we could straighten that out, assuming the guy who got framed (parodied, if you insist) waits for us to realize what happened. What if he never comes back? How do we make it up to him then?
I think SoK is onto something. Gambino, if you wanna be Gambino again, we can do that. Some other jerk tried to poach your name but I cut him off at the knees before he could post. Kind of ironic that you were almost the victim of the same sort of "joke" you set into motion, though.
This name-swapping crap is out of hand, though.
digger said:Not to inject a serious note into this or anything, but just to clear things up... The Ed Norton avatar had nothing to do with it. We had a bro on a timeout. Making alters when you're on a timeout leads to a longer timeout, or a permanent ban.
Yeah, maybe we could straighten that out, assuming the guy who got framed (parodied, if you insist) waits for us to realize what happened. What if he never comes back? How do we make it up to him then?
I think SoK is onto something. Gambino, if you wanna be Gambino again, we can do that. Some other jerk tried to poach your name but I cut him off at the knees before he could post. Kind of ironic that you were almost the victim of the same sort of "joke" you set into motion, though.
This name-swapping crap is out of hand, though.
because he should know betterdannomight said:I've seen other change their names without anyone getting pissed. So why be so harsh on him?
Lestat said:Worst designed poll ever. Stick to POLE, you seem to handle it like a pro.
So the thread is "Petition to bring Gambino back"
Then the poll title is "Leave it alone"
Then options:
1. Yes give him his name back and disable his name changing thingy
2. no, let him change his name anytime he wants
3. hes a dork
So #3 is a given, and pointless, but that is the en vogue thing to do with polls these days, leave a 3rd option that makes no sense, isn't really funny, but everyone will pick.
So back to the first two supposedly legitimate opions.
If I select #1, what I am selecting really? Am I saying yes to the thread title of "bring Gambino back" or to the poll title of "leave it alone?" Lets say I am saying YES, bring him back, but disable his name changing ability.. fine, ok option.
Then you go to #2.. it says NO.. so if I select that I am saying NO don't bring him back? But then you go on to say "let him change his name anytime he wants"... how on earth can I vote to let him change his name anytime he wants but NOT vote for him to come back?
What an assinine poll.
dannomight said:I've seen other change their names without anyone getting pissed. So why be so harsh on him?
hey digger , can we ban soklu ????digger said:'Cause deliberately jumping on a name that was already in the middle of a clusterfuck makes it worse.
ohhh boy.. don't piss on a hornets nest bro!!hotzie said:hey digger , can we ban soklu ????
you a green beret?sfmonster said:I want to be Lestat, he can be me. I get the condo in Cali, he gets the beret. I hit the beach all spring and summer, he pulls the trigger. Can someone make this happen.
pintoca said:Gambino for mod. It's long overdue
KillahBee said:
This page contains mature content. By continuing, you confirm you are over 18 and agree to our TOS and User Agreement.
Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below 














