Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

OK crackers... help me choose a cycle!

anal itch

New member
Which would you run and why? I don’t mine long cycles and already have everything to do either one. I’ve never used Tren or EQ so I don’t know how well they stack. Goal is to harden up and drop BF below 10%. Would love to get to 210lbs @ 8% BF!

Stats:

5’10”
214lbs @ 13%BF
Age 31
Diet is good. Macros are normally 50/20/30 (protein / carbs / fat) @ 3200 calories. All clean.
Cardio 5 times a week (20minutes AM after workout / 20 minutes PM all moderate pace)

This will be my 3rd cycle


Week 1-16 Test Prop 100mg ED
Week 1-14 EQ 500mg per week
Week 1-8 Tren Ace 75mg ED
Week 10-16 Winny 50mg ED

Aromasin 20mg ED
Nolva as needed

OR

Week 1-12 Test Prop 100mg ED
Week 1-8 Tren Ace 75mg ED
Week 6-12 Winny 50mg ED

Aromasin 20mg ED
Nolva as needed

Normal PCT (Nolva/Clomid) and HCG half way through and two weeks prior to the end.
 
I would stick with prop/tren/wv... Ive cut many many times and nothing gets me as shredded than ticking to the basics.. honestly, im a big guy and when i cut i use MORE gear than when I bulk I usually use prop,tren,winstrol at 100/75/50mg ed respectively.. that does seems to work fine and actually add a few pounds while i shed the fat off.. good luck
 
anal itch: Go with your first choice:

Week 1-16 Test Prop 100mg ED
Week 1-14 EQ 500mg per week
Week 1-8 Tren Ace 75mg ED
Week 10-16 Winny 50mg ED

The 4 stack well together, especially the tren & Eq
 
Week 1-16 Test Prop 100mg ED
Week 1-14 EQ 500mg per week
Week 1-8 Tren Ace 75mg ED
Week 10-16 Winny 50mg ED

Aromasin 20mg ED
Nolva as needed I like it, looks like something I would do.
 
Go with number 2, there's really no great reason to stretch out your cycle JUST to add the EQ. You really won't notice a huge amount of difference with or without the EQ. So save the cash, shorten your cycle 4 weeks, and get on to your next one that much sooner.
 
Go with number 2, there's really no great reason to stretch out your cycle JUST to add the EQ. You really won't notice a huge amount of difference with or without the EQ. So save the cash, shorten your cycle 4 weeks, and get on to your next one that much sooner.


RADAR
 
Last edited:
K all around. Thanks for all the replies... even the itchy anus hating one posted by RADAR ;)

The reason I was planning on using Prop was to keep the test related bloat to a minimum. Also I have 120ml @ 100mg/ml of it. I have enough Cyp and E as well but wanted to give Prop a shot (so to speak)

Will I see the same bloat as Cyp/E on that much Prop per week?
 
anal itch said:
Which would you run and why? I don’t mine long cycles and already have everything to do either one. I’ve never used Tren or EQ so I don’t know how well they stack. Goal is to harden up and drop BF below 10%. Would love to get to 210lbs @ 8% BF!

Stats:

5’10”
214lbs @ 13%BF
Age 31
Diet is good. Macros are normally 50/20/30 (protein / carbs / fat) @ 3200 calories. All clean.
Cardio 5 times a week (20minutes AM after workout / 20 minutes PM all moderate pace)

This will be my 3rd cycle


Week 1-16 Test Prop 100mg ED
Week 1-14 EQ 500mg per week
Week 1-8 Tren Ace 75mg ED
Week 10-16 Winny 50mg ED

Aromasin 20mg ED
Nolva as needed

OR

Week 1-12 Test Prop 100mg ED
Week 1-8 Tren Ace 75mg ED
Week 6-12 Winny 50mg ED

Aromasin 20mg ED
Nolva as needed

Normal PCT (Nolva/Clomid) and HCG half way through and two weeks prior to the end.


I'm going with #1******Save the Tren for later.
 
#1 looks like my dream cycle, wish I had the $$$ for that. I would save yourself some pain and loot by running test e or cyp w/ an anti-e instead of all those shots of prop. Both cycles look good though, good luck bro!
 
I am going with something similar to #1 this summer - Test E/EQ/Tri-Tren/T-bol, the only things I am still working on is the length (I think 16 weeks is too long) and running EQ and tren at the same time (prolactins).


Bluesman
 
They both look like great well thought out cycles. You will get great results off both (obviously more from #1). The answer is ultimately up to you. Do you want to be on for 16 wks, do you want to take that wide array of drugs? Do you want to deal with a slightly harder recovery process? If your answers are yes then let #1 rip cuz you will look like a phukn shredded animal @ the end of it.
 
well you could

run number 1 and see how that works for ya take apporpriate time off then hit number 2 and see how that works for ya.....

time is a great thing.......so try them both
 
Thanks again, K all around. You all have provided some great comments for me to contemplate. Whichever I do, I'll be starting mid-February. I'll keep ya posted.
 
Top Bottom