Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

NYC opens first public high school for Gays and Lesbians!!!

fuck gays and well, not lesbos, but in all reality what the fuck is there point to better the world if they don't have any children. Really.
 
motocrosser said:
fuck gays and well, not lesbos, but in all reality what the fuck is there point to better the world if they don't have any children. Really.

Now that was just dumb.

If adding to overpopulation is the only thing that you consider to be a contribution to society than you must really have no mind or imagination.
 
Tiervexx said:


Please explain why we have an appendix then.

It is known that the appendix contains lymphatic tissue and has a role in controlling bacteria entering the intestines. It functions in a similar way to the tonsils at the other end of the alimentary canal, which are known to increase resistance to throat infections.
 
Tiervexx said:


You sit on your glutes. If you look at an anatomy chart you will notice that there are no major muscles attached to the tail bone.

First off, when a person sits down, pressure is exerted on the coccyx. As a response, the tailbone moves forward to absorb most of the shock that sitting down entails. This should be observed as an active reaction to stress the body is experiencing and is therefore a protective response by the “vestigial” tailbone. Another way to determine the importance of the coccyx is by looking at the different structures that are connected to it (since one of the main functions of the skeletal system is its connection with muscles and other formations). The coccyx is cranially connected to the sacrum. According to NASS, the articulation between these two, help function as a “shock absorber” (NASS, 4)
 
Tiervexx said:


So you denounce something that you admit you have not read into?

Take a minute and think about how bad that makes you look.

You say it is propaganda? Propaganda for what?

You think that Darwin was just looking for a why to denounce god. If he just wanted to denounce god than he would have just invented some other religion. That would have saved a lot of time and been much simpler.

I have read plenty of biology books in my day. The Darwinian story has remained relatively unchanged for generations. It's what most of us learned in biology class, and it's still taught much as we learned it. The problem is that none of it is true, and most of it is filled with inconsistencies, misinterpretation and bad (sometimes fraudulent) data as to be worthless as science. It's easy for me to see that the evolutionary theory has no solid evidence to support it and is full of weaknesses.

Believe it or not many prominent scientists are becoming persuaded that only a highly intelligent being could design and create the complexity of cells, the sophisticated programming of DNA molecules and other life processes that modern technology is revealing.

I understand it's hard for you to admit that God was the creator after you've been brainwashed from all those Biology texts you have read in school but hopefully you will give up trying to desperately prove evolution. Hey, you might have been born with that evolution gene.;)
 
Last edited:
FreakMonster said:

I don't need to open a biology text because I know it's just all propaganda and it's so obvious that evolution has many flaws for example there is no scientific law that allows something to evolve from nothing. There is no scientific law that can account for non- living things coming to life (dirt, rocks, etc.) And there is no scientific law that would allow one kind of creature to turn naturally into a completely different type of creature.

This is supposed to be support of evidence for evolution? The most critical "links" in this chain from land animals to whales are too fragmented to be considered objective evidence. This is particularly true because the parts that are missing in these critical "links" are the most critical parts needed to establishing such a link. These rear appendages were not LEGS!!


Vestigial organs’ provide no evidence for evolutionary theory. Remember that every organ once considered to be a useless, degenerating leftover from some bygone evolutionary era has important functions. It is ignorance that permits evolutionists to call them vestigial.


This bone is NOT useless in humans today. The tailbone has important functions, like enabling us to sit. Ask someone who has had his tail bone removed what it's like to sit. Various muscles attached to the tail bone are important for facilitating bowel and labor movements, supporting internal organs, and keeping the anus closed.

You are obviously beyond help. Any remotely scientific mind could understand this fact. You have been too drummed down by Christian propaganda. Yes propaganda. The bible has ZERO evidence behind it. Just a buncha stories. Period. I'm done talking with closed minded person like you. Learn to think, man. Next.
 
MarthaStewart said:
I think the school is a great idea.

The gays no longer have to recruit in the non-homo schools, which means that we will have more strapping young football playing lads growing up to rape cheerleaders at parties in college.

Without an active recruitment program, the gays will drastically drop in numbers, and before you know it, there will no longer be a need for their own schools.


LOL....Finally, an argument that makes sense. OF course, the fact is that we have overtaken the media now and are busy feminizing straight men through adult recruitment programs like "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy."

photo_group_pic.jpg
 
motocrosser said:
fuck gays and well, not lesbos, but in all reality what the fuck is there point to better the world if they don't have any children. Really.

There point not lesbos is to love freely like what the fuck straight people do. Really.

gt0697.jpg
 
by the way, the debate here on evolution is quite dated. You need to consult Stephen J. Gould's work, especially on "punctuated equilibria," which does indeed question the notion of gradual evolutionary change because of poor fossil evidence. His theory offers an alternative that does not resort to creationism.

The gradualist model of evolution is no longer canonized, mainly because of Gould's work.
 
Top Bottom