Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

Now available- PURE CREATINE ETHYL ESTER

Ulter said:

Thanks!

If i take 2 before a workout and 2 after is that alright or do you suggest something else? Also what about days off? First thing in the morning on an empty stomach(4 caps) alright?

Sorry so many questions...

Tony
 
Tony104104 said:
Thanks!

If i take 2 before a workout and 2 after is that alright or do you suggest something else? Also what about days off? First thing in the morning on an empty stomach(4 caps) alright?

Sorry so many questions...

Tony

thats fine

take it- lower dose if you wish

probably better if you space it out a bit
 
macro/ulter

regular creatine has been shown to improve memory scores in children, adults, and even dementia/elderly patients. are you aware of any studies with CEE & memory?
-
 
geoboy said:
macro/ulter

regular creatine has been shown to improve memory scores in children, adults, and even dementia/elderly patients. are you aware of any studies with CEE & memory?
-

any positive benefits of monohydrate will be as good or better with CEE. Considering the tissue involved (fatty brain tissue) its likely to be significantly better.
 
macrophage69alpha said:
any positive benefits of monohydrate will be as good or better with CEE. Considering the tissue involved (fatty brain tissue) its likely to be significantly better.


what was the question again? :D


thanks
 
I should get mine today. I was on V-12, so, I will take a 2 week break (to clear the system) then try the CEE. I will let you know results.
 
Have been taking CEE about four weeks now, began during PCT. I lost my usual eight or ten pounds following my last cycle, but have since put most of it back on and got most of my strength back. I don't want to sound like someone who endorses stuff, but I genuinely think it's a good product. Three caplets about an hour before my workout taken with simple carbs, and I can feel the pump.
 
Maybe I missed it somewhere in this thread, but it should be taken on workout days only? Or on days off also?
 
i experienced strength and slight weight gains in the first week on this stuff, but it kills my stomach, not pain, serious bloating. feels awful. is there anything i can do??
 
DaveTSI said:
i experienced strength and slight weight gains in the first week on this stuff, but it kills my stomach, not pain, serious bloating. feels awful. is there anything i can do??

are you using using PureCEE from scotts finest?
 
Would you guys consider this a steroid or a cheating form of creatine. Is this good for somebody who is 18 has trained off and on and is lean. 6'0 169 lbs.

I want to up my sad bench press and gain strength. Mainly in bench.
 
ZacTargac said:
Would you guys consider this a steroid or a cheating form of creatine. Is this good for somebody who is 18 has trained off and on and is lean. 6'0 169 lbs.

I want to up my sad bench press and gain strength. Mainly in bench.
1. NO- and its sad how media attempts to link to pharmacologically disimilar compounds.
2. NO- but certainly a better one
3. YES
 
im 185-190 taking recommended 3 capsules 1 hour before my workout. never had a problem before with reg creatine. maybe ill give it another week again and see what happens. maybe it was a stomach bug or something.
 
Its been a week and so far i notice some strenght increase....I need to get more sleep! So maybe when i get that down straight, i'll notice more in the weeks to come...
I'll update again when/if i notice any changes :)
 
Excidium28 said:
So i can just keep bumpin the caps till the bottle is empty no break? Not even 3 weeks on 1 week off?

no sure excatly what you mean. it can be used constantly without breaks. However there is no need to "keep bumpin the caps" (if that is meant as increasing the dose)
 
Excidium28 said:
So i can just keep bumpin the caps till the bottle is empty no break? Not even 3 weeks on 1 week off?

not sure excatly what you mean. it can be used constantly without breaks. However there is no need to "keep bumpin the caps" (if that is meant as increasing the dose)
 
Strength still increasing...Still not much in the size department, and the pumps are pretty good. But it's the strength part that's really amazing...For a supplement, this stuff is unreal! :chomp:
 
Do you need to take these on your off days

Say my lifting schedule is mon-fri but lets say thursday i couldnt make it tot he gym.
Would is till take the creatine or not
 
ZacTargac said:
Do you need to take these on your off days

Say my lifting schedule is mon-fri but lets say thursday i couldnt make it tot he gym.
Would is till take the creatine or not

you dont have too, but it can only help. Increased cellular creatine will improve cellular metabolism and muscle hydration (which can only help with recovery)
 
macrophage69alpha said:


Do you think there would be any benefits from me taking 5 a day? I'm taking 4 right now, weighing around 210lbs...Looking for more mass, but really don't want to waste my money either...

THANKS!
Tony

PS Strength increases pretty much every workout. Very please in that depatment...:)
 
There are people using more. Lots of people. No one is reporting better results worthy of using much more though. It's expensive but going to 5 may have some benefit over four that's worth it to you. Don't throw your money away on 8 or 10 though like I see some people doing on other boards.
 
Here's my 2 cents. I have been on CEE for 1.5 weeks. For the first week I took 3 a day (I weigh 182). I felt ok, but not really like I had that creatine pump. This week I increased to 4/ed & I can feel a difference. I feel stronger & more of a pump in the workouts. This may be just me, but I feel more of a vascular/pumped up feeling from V12. The CEE is more of just a strength feeling. At first I thought it wasn't going to be as good as V12 or Bolt, but now, I am starting to dig it. I may experiment a bit more with dosages.
 
split endz said:
I feel stronger & more of a pump in the workouts. This may be just me, but I feel more of a vascular/pumped up feeling from V12. The CEE is more of just a strength feeling.

I agree with you 100% bro...V12 gave me good pumps, but CEE is giving much ALOT more strength!
 
are you guys taking this all in one big dosage before your workout?

I am wondering if what would be the benefits of spreading out the dosage.

I am more interested to see if it would help with overall recovery and energy.

currently im working out twice a day two to three times a week and im looking for any/all recovery benefits i can get
 
Thanks Ulter! Ill give it a try
 
Ulter said:
Before your workout. Sorry I should have said that.

Macro will be writing about the reason for CEE rather than Creatine. This is someone else's description.

Creatine Ethyl Ester is a brand new type of supplement that does not really compare to any creatine you may have tried. Its rapid absorption and nearly 100% utilization makes Creatine Ethyl Ester 30-40 times more potent than regular creatine. Its absorption is so potent, it will improve the performance and delivery of other supplements. Due to its advanced structure, no bloating, cramping, dehydration, fat gain or water retention is experienced. What is experienced is insane pumps, dramatically increased endurance and of course, strength gains. Due to its inability to break down, Creatine Ethyl Ester is stable in various liquids.

What a complete load of bollocks 30-40 times more potent, where's the scientific research to back that one up.

No water retention huh? -That would mean that its a load of crap than, as the water retention is the main reason that creatine is effective (above that of increased ATP synthesis and enhanced protein synthesis) - 1 molecule of creatine attracts an additional 3 molecules of water into the muscle.

I guess this is another creatine tri-malate (for those of you who didn't know, that's a crock of shit too, as it is an impossible molecule to form - only 2 malates can possibly be attracted to a creatine molecule due to the atomic forces, rendering di-malate the only possible form)

I bet this has a low dose of actual creatine in it too. - v12 has 3g in it - er, rip off!

Tip - disolve your creatine in very hot, but not boiling water - this increases the absorption (actual scientific research to back that up)

Many studies have shown that creatine monohydrate is highly bioavailiable, and absorbability. Honestly, these "super" creatine all play on the placebo effect, as there is a limit as to how much creatine can be stored in the muscle. By taking plain 'ol creatine monohydrate (without a sugar related insulin spike) for long periods, you will eventually reach that limit. That is the truth, argue if you like, but that is the truth.
 
Last edited:
"By taking plain 'ol creatine monohydrate (without a sugar related insulin spike) for long periods, you will eventually reach that limit. That is the truth, argue if you like, but that is the truth."

Sorry that doesnt fly with everybody. I have taken prolabs creapure for over 3 months and didnt do much for me. Taken v12, swole v2, cell-tech etc. I am what you can call a creatine non responder been on AF's pure cee for about 3 weeks, I have gained some water weight but my strength is through the roof and I know it is from the creatine cause that is the only thing I am.
 
SPORT SCIENTIST said:
What a complete load of bollocks 30-40 times more potent, where's the scientific research to back that one up.

No water retention huh? -That would mean that its a load of crap than, as the water retention is the main reason that creatine is effective (above that of increased ATP synthesis) - 1 molecule of creatine attracts an additional 3 molecules of water into the muscle.

I guess this is another creatine tri-malate (for those of you who didn't know, that's a crock of shit too, as it is an impossible molecule to form - only 2 malates can possibly be attracted to a creatine molecule due to the atomic forces, rendering di-malate the only possible form)

I bet this has a low dose of actual creatine in it too. - v12 has 3g in it - er, rip off!

Tip - disolve your creatine in very hot, but not boiling water - this increases the absorption (actual scientific research to back that up)

Many studies have shown that creatine monohydrate is highly bioavailiable, and absorbability. Honestly, these "super" creatine all play on the placebo effect, as there is a limit as to how much creatine can be stored in the muscle. By taking plain 'ol creatine monohydrate (without a sugar related insulin spike) for long periods, you will eventually reach that limit. That is the truth, argue if you like, but that is the truth.

1. if you had read the post you would realize that those are the attributions of another company.

2. creatine ethyl ester effectively increases cellular content of creatine, hence "water retention"- non muscle related- due to extracellular creatine and creatinine is minimal.

3. there is very good evidence of the effectiveness with other amino prodrugs. only in extreme scenarios will there be a 30-40time greater effectiveness. realistically given other clinical models 4-8 times is more in line with reality.

4. your guess is incorrect, creatine ethyl ester is just that. creatine esterified, which as noted above greatly improves delivery of pure creatine to the plasma. with respect to monohydrate, in most individuals there is significant degradation prior to uptake.

5. studies do show that monohydrate is decently bioavailable, what they have not addressed is the metabolites of creatine that cause water retention and bloating. Most of which are a result of degradation in the gut, prior to uptake into the plasma.

6. there is actually in the population a large # of non-responders, most of these people do not respond because of near complete breakdown of creatine prior to uptake into the plasma. The get elevated creatinine levels, but little if any creatine uptake into the muscle cells. All the sides and none of the benefits.
 
Last edited:
motar said:
"By taking plain 'ol creatine monohydrate (without a sugar related insulin spike) for long periods, you will eventually reach that limit. That is the truth, argue if you like, but that is the truth."

Sorry that doesnt fly with everybody. I have taken prolabs creapure for over 3 months and didnt do much for me. Taken v12, swole v2, cell-tech etc. I am what you can call a creatine non responder been on AF's pure cee for about 3 weeks, I have gained some water weight but my strength is through the roof and I know it is from the creatine cause that is the only thing I am.

.If you are a non responder to creatine, then I would say that d-pinitol has its uses in this case ,perhaps your body just doesn't absorb/assimilate creratine very efficiently - I am not familiar with the brand you are talking about, but I think it is likely that it has d-pinitol

I have done a lot of scientific research into creatine and many other supplements in the last few months, and have found absolutely no trials or reports on esterfied creatine in any scientific journal. If something is not reviewed by peers, it is just heresay. I am willing to wager that the information that you have just given came from a biassed source. I do not believe it. Anyway, if bloating and stomach upsets are a problem (never had this before), then creatine magnesium chelate is a better option as it is 1. Cheaper and 2. Backed by scientific research (in terms of reducing the possibility of stomach upset)

Creatine Magnesium Chelate

Magnesium is a macromineral that has many synergistic effects with creatine. In fact, ATP is actually found in the muscle cells bound to magnesium for stability. Magnesium has been shown to enhance strength and energy levels taken on it’s own. It is intimately involved in the energy cycle and has cardio-protective effects as well. Creatine monohydrate has been shown to be very effective in many studies, however some users experience stomach discomfort due to lower absorption rate and breakdown into it’s by-product creatinine in the stomach. By creating a creatine-magnesium chelate, creatine can be protected from the harsh environment of the stomach acid and this chelate can help prevent breakdown. It can also help enhance absorption of creatine and decrease stomach discomfort that many creatine users (and their friends) can appreciate. This chelation provides a highly bioavailable form of creatine and magnesium. Some initial research shows it is better absorbed and tolerated than traditional creatine monohydrate. It also mixes well in water. There have been no side effects shown with this compound at the recommended doses and it shows excellent promise for the future of creatine.
(Rehan jalili, head of the sport supplement research foundation)

Over 95% of scientific studies use creatine monohydrate as their source of creatine, with at an estimate 80%+ positive reponses - what does that tell you?


The normal muscel Tcr concentration ranges between 120 and 125 mmol/kg dry mass muscle (Hultman et al 1990). However more recent studies indicate that ingesting creatine (20g/d) with glucose, carbohydrate and protein (Greenwodd et al 2000) aswell as D-Pinitol (Greenwood et al 2001) increased muscle creatine content to a greater degree than when creatine was injested alone.
A maintenance dose of 250mg d-pinitol was found to have the greatest effect on phosphocreatine concentrations after an initial loading phase of 250mg taken 3 days/week for 1 week (Walter et al 2003)
In your case, I would also suggest supplementing with r-ala (r-enametor alpha lipoic acid, much more effective than the r/s enametor mix in the vast majority of alas) - but with much more than you get from the supplement companies - I have the info on my hard drive, but It's late so I'm not going to reference it properly):
200 mg taken 5x per day with 5 servings of 5g creatine monohydrate for 1 week loading is optimal for phosphocreatine uptake - 200mg needed of creatine thereafter needed for maintenance(A 2004 canadian study, comparing various doseages)

As a result all subjects (both d-pinitol and r-ala) experienced an increase in muscle creatine content. - this is more relevant to you, being a non responder, than most creatine users. I still stick to my previous remarks for the vast majority of people taking creatine - you will eventually (albeit more slowly) reach peak creatine concentrations.

One other thing, I am a vegetarian, and have a great response to creatine (probably to do with having low baseline levels, as a result of my diet)
- It could be that you have high levels of creatine due to eating a lot of red meat/fish.
 
Last edited:
Ulter said:
The research you're calling biased (without a clue) is from the University of Nebraska who is the current patented applied for holder. The University of Nebraska invented it.

You are very much behind the curve on this subject.

Surely if they invented it, then they are biased?
-You cannot use a single source from the inventors of the substance as iron clad proof!

I suggest that you re-read what I wrote. Even if this creatine did everything you said it does, the vast majority of people DO respond well to creatine monohydrate. It does not matter whether the creatine is better absorped, - if the muscles are maximally saturated with creatine, irrespective of how bioavailiable the creatine is, it will not be taken up by the muscles.

No creatine has been shown to enhance the amount of creatine that can possibly be taken up by the cells. However, if there was one substance that should be looked at more closely, it is tribasic sodium phosphate (use 2g per day). It is hypothesised to be a potential source of phosphates that could increase the amount of creatine taken up by the muscle, also dramatically lowering pH (2grams has the same effect as 0.2g/kg sodium bicarbinate in this regard, but without the stomach cramps). Phosphate loading increases the capacity to store intramuscular inorganic phosphates, which may permit a greater quantity of creatine phosphate to be stored for use during short-duration burst activity (Wolinski et al 2004)
 
Surely if they invented it, then they are biased?
-You cannot use a single source from the inventors of the substance as iron clad proof!

The University of Nebraska is not in the supplement business. They have no reason to skew any clinical research and it's ridiculous to say they would.

I suggest that you re-read what I wrote. Even if this creatine did everything you said it does, the vast majority of people DO respond well to creatine monohydrate. It does not matter whether the creatine is better absorped, - if the muscles are maximally saturated with creatine, irrespective of how bioavailiable the creatine is, it will not be taken up by the muscles.


I sold creatine monohydrate and stopped because people were not responding and subsequently stopped buying it. Since we've started selling CEE not a single person has complained about it and most are buying a 2nd and 3rd bottle.
If you like monohydrate so much use it. You've never used CEE and don't know what it's like so your unqualified to comment on the differences.
 
- I have conducted exercise physiology/sport nutrition trials when I was at unversity myself; and yes often university trials can be biassed - if you are looking for a particular result, it is more likely that you will see it. In order for something to be accepted by fellow scientists, a study must be published in a relevant sientific journal, and be peer reviewed. Even then, the effects will not be accepted as accepted knowledege, until many many other trials have been done confirming the results


If you like monohydrate so much use it. You've never used CEE and don't know what it's like so your unqualified to comment on the differences.[/QUOTE]

Well, good luck (I honestly mean that)
 
Last edited:
Macro, I know that is is best to experiment with different dosing schedules to find what works best for you. However, if strength-only gains for a workout were the only goal, and recovery is not a big issue, would you think a single dose pre-workout would be more effective than spread throughout the day? I realize similar questions have been asked before, but I ony want your guess/opinion.
 
DaveTSI said:
i experienced strength and slight weight gains in the first week on this stuff, but it kills my stomach, not pain, serious bloating. feels awful. is there anything i can do??

update: i have taken this twice (4 pills) before my previous two workouts, and it hasnt bothered my stomach. ill update again at the end of the week, im beginning to think it was a bug
 
SlimJim300 said:
Macro, I know that is is best to experiment with different dosing schedules to find what works best for you. However, if strength-only gains for a workout were the only goal, and recovery is not a big issue, would you think a single dose pre-workout would be more effective than spread throughout the day? I realize similar questions have been asked before, but I ony want your guess/opinion.

yes
 
I been takin CEE for a week now 4 caps a day 1 in the morning 1 noon and 2 before work out. Havent really noticed any big gains, I just feel like Im at my fullest every time I go in the gym. I never took any supplements before only AAS so my expectations might be too high.
 
Is there a preferred way other esterified amino acids are consumed?

For example, is there any benefit to consuming CEE with a source of fat, or is that not necessary? How about an empty stomach?
 
Been taking 3 a day 40-60min before workout w/ some gatorade. Would I be better off taking 2 pre-workout and 2 post-workout? Also, I'm taking trex/YES as I'm trying to cut is there a better way to use these supps, including Glucorell R, that I may not be doing?
 
Placed my order for PureCEE as well as some Glucorell R the other day. I will be starting them next week. I'll post my results if anyone is still looking for some info on this stuff.

I've taken creatine in the past, but it seemed that I got all of the bad with very little of the good. I would hold tons of water and look extremely bloated. Wasn't worth the little strength I gained. Hopefully, from what I've been reading, PureCEE will be different :)
 
BUMP DIS SHITT! I been on for over a week, didnt get to work out the week I began taking it. Due to some life events that left me weak as hell and not eating much, went to the gym the next week and strength was up and I did more weight and reps than my last work out. good stuff.
 
Well after reading this big ass long post since i got nothing better to do at this time i have decided to give it a try seeing this stuff has nothing but good raves.
Thanks to all who keep the post up to date with results! :beer:
 
Size(lean mass) is starting to come now, and strength is still going up! Wish i could gain more weight though. :( All in all i am very please and will be buying more before this batch is up! :p
 
I switched from creatine monohydrate to CEE about 3 weeks ago. Even though I responded to mono just fine, the bloat and discomfort associated with monohydrate just isn't there with CEE -- I love this stuff.

This question may have been asked before, but do you really need to cycle creatine (CEE in particular)? I did creatine for some "oomph" during my current AAS cycle, and really don't want to get off it during PCT and recovery... Am I doing a dumb thing?
 
My order should come in the mail today. I'm looking foward to it. I'll post some results. I've been taking TRAC creatine for the past year.
 
MRI is attempting to get a license from a company (university) that does not hold the patent (they have an application which has been challenged- as its not novel- it was synthesized many years ago). its too late for anyone to file a use patent, so it going to be a moot issue.

PURECEE is "true" creatine ethyl ester
 
I bought a Kilo of bulk CEE, so far its pretty potent given the amount you have to take. Initially, I took 30 grams in one serving and proceeded to puke my guts out...Now I only take about 5-8 grams. Go easy.
 
macrophage69alpha said:
MRI is attempting to get a license from a company (university) that does not hold the patent (they have an application which has been challenged- as its not novel- it was synthesized many years ago). its too late for anyone to file a use patent, so it going to be a moot issue.

PURECEE is "true" creatine ethyl ester



yep :)

further:



alot of the CEE out there is junk

either impure (hence unstable) or worse FAKE



sometimes when the price is too good it most likely is.........
 
as has been mentioned before this is a very unfortunate situation of "bulk powder" companies not testing the material, especially since the information about purity issues was available well before any of these companies started selling it.
 
excellant product! Anafit has some of the best/most innovative products out there. Their prices are competitive and possess the best quality product around. (great customer service as well)
 
My friend bought the powder version from another company and it was tasteless...I told him it was probably regular creatine or something else...After a few minutes of arguing we read that it was suppose to taste a little on the bitter side...So i opened a cap from Anafit and wow! :sick: That stuff was terrible!!! I usually can stomach things, but it would be real hard to stomach this stuff in powder form...Good thing you guys are capping this stuff... :p

BTW, My strength is still going up...Been on 3 months now and getting stronger every week!
 
macrophage69alpha said:
as has been mentioned before this is a very unfortunate situation of "bulk powder" companies not testing the material, especially since the information about purity issues was available well before any of these companies started selling it.


one VERY LARGE outfit is now paying the price for selling "fake" material

its too bad since that particular ownership is nice
 
Top Bottom