Please Scroll Down to See Forums Below
napsgear
genezapharmateuticals
domestic-supply
puritysourcelabs
UGL OZ
UGFREAK
napsgeargenezapharmateuticals domestic-supplypuritysourcelabsUGL OZUGFREAK

North Korea is stupid

UpperTone said:


Well let's see... China shares an approx. 1000 mile border with N. Korea and would likely be flooded with refugees causing instability in their country. Chinese feel an obligation to side with N. Korea and does God only knows what. Russia sides with China (which I believe they would). Fallout crosses into S. Korea turning some European countries against the US (we all know who they'd be). In your little scenario, most Islamic countries are hit (this would really be the reason Russia would become involved).

What I'm suggesting is... your outlined chain of cleancut events is very naive. Once nukes start flying, they'll be flying everywhere. If N. Korea were so stupid as to fire a nuclear bomb at N. America (the piece of crap would probably go off course and hit Vancouver), the response would/should be for the US to use conventional weapons in return. I think the US military could handle N. Korea without risking fullout nuclear war.


Well said, and I agree, we should not respond with nuclear force against N. Korea BECAUSE of China and the border they both share, but also because of S. Korea and our alliance w/them. If N. Korea were in fact stupid enough to launch an unprovoked missile attack at the US, I truthfully don't think that China would let us take care of business as long as we did it conventionally and not with nuclear power...
 
FLASHMAN1 said:



Well said, and I agree, we should not respond with nuclear force against N. Korea BECAUSE of China and the border they both share, but also because of S. Korea and our alliance w/them. If N. Korea were in fact stupid enough to launch an unprovoked missile attack at the US, I truthfully don't think that China would let us take care of business as long as we did it conventionally and not with nuclear power...

I wouldnt be surprised if we talked to china and got the ok to nuke them. Or maybe a joint carpet bombing of the country.
 
FLASHMAN1 said:



Well said, and I agree, we should not respond with nuclear force against N. Korea BECAUSE of China and the border they both share, but also because of S. Korea and our alliance w/them. If N. Korea were in fact stupid enough to launch an unprovoked missile attack at the US, I truthfully don't think that China would let us take care of business as long as we did it conventionally and not with nuclear power...

I wouldnt be surprised if we talked to china and got the ok to nuke them. Or maybe a joint carpet bombing of the country.
 
MortyJackson said:


I get the idea that you seriously overestimate your own intelligence.

That's a typical comment to make to someone who disagrees with you. BTW, why haven't you commented on the sticky regarding your butt buddy Ashcroft's new round of civil liberties revocations?
 
As long as we're playing with various nuclear detonation scenarios,
I was imagining....If I were a madman with one nuclear missle and wanted to create the USA as much pain as possible, what would I do....
Set it off in Manhattan? Washington D.C.?
No, I think I would detinate it high over the California Sierra Nevadas.
That would render hundreds of square miles of snowpack radioactive.
That snowpack represents most of the California water supply...poisoned.
San Francisco, San Jose, Los Angeles, San Diego, plus the entire California farming valley...no water...for years.
Imagine the rest of America having to absorbe the former California residents fleeing to other cities. We'd be overwhelmed.
Fun scenarios for the paranoid to ponder next time you're stoned.
 
Chinaain't shit! And we wouldn't get their permission to do sqaut! We will do what we want and how we want! We wipe n korea off the map, south will not need us and china will have some beach front in athousand years!
 
Frackal said:


That's a typical comment to make to someone who disagrees with you. BTW, why haven't you commented on the sticky regarding your butt buddy Ashcroft's new round of civil liberties revocations?

What disagreement? Im just mentioning your poor judgement of yourself because of your "simple minded" comment. If you can make such observations then i you shouldnt be bitching when i make them.
 
Top Bottom